The UN Security Council, normative legitimacy and the challenge of specificity

References

• Berdal, M. (2003). The UN Security Council: Ineffective but indispensable. Survival, 45(2), 7–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besson, S. (2014). The legitimate authority of international human rights. In A. Føllesdal, J. K. Schaffer, & G. Ulfstein (Eds.), The legitimacy of international human rights regimes. Legal, political and philosophical perspective (pp. 32–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, M., & Heupel, M. (2015). The legitimacy of the UN Security Council: Evidence from recent general assembly debates. International Studies Quarterly, 59(2), 238–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D R. Wolfrum & V. Röben (Eds (Eds) (2008). The concept of legitimacy in international law. In R. Wolfrum & V. Röben (Eds (Eds) (Eds), Legitimacy in international law (pp. pp. 309–317). Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bosco, D. (2014). Assessing the UN Security Council: A concert perspective. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 20(4), 545–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2010). Legitimacy of international law. In S. Besson & J. Tasioulas (Eds.), The philosophy of international law (pp. 79–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2013). The heart of human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2018). Institutional legitimacy. In D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne, & S. Wall (Eds.), Oxford studies in political philosophy (pp. 53–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2006). The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(4), 405–437.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2011). Precommitment regimes for intervention: Supplementing the Security Council. Ethics & International Affairs, 25(1), 41–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron, D. D. (1993). The legitimacy of the collective authority of the Security Council. The American Journal of International Law, 87(4), 552–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiano, T. (2010). Democratic legitimacy and international institutions. In S. Besson & J. Tasioulas (Eds.), The philosophy of international law (pp. 119–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, T. (2012). The legitimacy of international institutions. In A. Marmor (Ed.), The routledge companion to philosophy of law (pp. 380–393). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, B., & Hurd, I. (2008). The UN Security Council and the politics of international authority. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1999). Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view. In I. Shapiro & C. Hacker-Cordón (Eds.), Democracy’s edges (pp. 19–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fassbender, B. (1998). UN Security Council reform and the right of veto: A constitutional perspective. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. (2012). The right to justification: Elements of a constructivist theory of justice. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., & Lawford-Smith, H. (2012). Political feasibility: A conceptual exploration. Political Studies, 60(4), 809–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R., & Keohane, R. O. (2005). Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassler, S. (2012). Reforming the UN Security Council membership: The illusion of representativeness. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. (2008). Myths of membership: The politics of legitimation in UN Security Council reform. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 14(2), 199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, I. (2008). Legislation and adjudication in the UN Security Council: Bringing down the deliberative deficit. The American Journal of International Law, 102(2), 275–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, T. (2016). Institutional facts and principles of global political legitimacy. Journal of International Political Theory, 12(2), 134–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, D. (2004). Conclusion. In D. Malone (Ed.), The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st century (pp. 617–652). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, I. (2018, April 18). In hindsight: What’s wrong with the Security Council? April 2018 monthly forecast [online]. Security Council Report. Retrieved from http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/monthly-forecast/2018-04/in_hindsight_whats_wrong_with_the_security_council.php
   Google Scholar
• Näsström, S. (2011). The challenge of the all-affected principle. Political Studies, 59(1), 116–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neusüss, P. (2008). Legislative Massnahmen des UN-Sicherheitsrates im Kampf gegen den internationalen Terrorismus: Eine Untersuchung des Inhalts und der Rechtmässigkeit von Resolution 1373 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Reaktionen der Staaten. München: Utz.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodley, N. (2015). Humanitarian intervention. In M. Weller, A. Solomou, & J. M. Rylatt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the use of force in international law (pp. 612–647). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ronzoni, M. (2009). The global order: A case of background injustice? A practice-dependent account. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 37(3), 229–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarooshi, D. (1999). The united nations and the development of collective security: The delegation by the UN Security Council of its chapter VII powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherz, A. (2013). The legitimacy of the demos: Who should be included in the demos and on what grounds? Living Reviews in Democracy, 4, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Scherz, A. (2019). Tying the legitimacy of international institutions to their political power. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Shraga, D. (2011). The Security Council and human rights – From discretion to promote obligation to protect. In B. Fassbender (Ed.), Securing human rights? Achievements and challenges of the UN Security Council (pp. 8–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. (2003). The legitimation of international governance: A discourse approach. European Journal of International Relations, 9(2), 249–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasioulas, J. (2010). The legitimacy of international law. In S. Besson & J. Tasioulas (Eds.), The philosophy of international law (pp. 97–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsagourias, N. (2011). Security council legislation, article 2 (7)of the UN charter, and the principle of subsidiarity. Leiden Journal of International Law, 24(3), 539–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voeten, E. (2005). The political origins of the UN Security Council’s ability to legitimize the use of force. International Organization, 59(3), 527–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, T. G. (2003). The illusion of UN Security Council reform. The Washington Quarterly, 26(4), 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zysset, A. (2016). Refining the structure and revisiting the relevant jurisdiction of crimes against humanity. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 29(1), 245–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar