306
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Democratic authority to geoengineer

References

  • Abizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic theory and border coercion: No right to unilaterally control your own borders. Political Theory, 36(1), 37–65.
  • Arrhenius, G. (2005). The boundary problem in democratic theory. In F. Tersman (Ed.), Democracy unbound: Basic explorations I (pp. 14–29). Stockholm: Filosofiska Institutionen, Stockholms Universitet.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018, January 30). Report on the conduct of the Australian marriage law postal survey (p. 56). Australian Bureau of Statistics.
  • Banerjee, A., & Chaudhury, S. (2010). Statistics without tears: Populations and samples. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 19(1), 60–65.
  • Bidadanure, J. (2017). Youth quotas, diversity, and long-termism. In I. Gonzalez-Ricoy & A. Gosseries (Eds.), Institutions for future generations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 266–280.
  • Blackstock, J. J., & Long, J. C. S. (2010). The politics of geoengineering. Science, 327(5965), 527.
  • Blomfield, M. (2015). Geoengineering in a climate of uncertainty. In J. Moss (Ed.), Climate change and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 39–58.
  • Buck, H. J., Gammon, A., & Preston, C. (2014). Gender and Geoengineering. Hypatia, 29(3), 651–669.
  • Carnegie Climate Geoengineering Governance Initiative (C2G2). (2018, September 12). FAQs: What does C2G2 see as the top priorities for geoengineering governance? c2g2.net. Retrieved from https://www.c2g2.net//faqs/
  • Carr, W., & Preston, C. (2017). Skewed vulnerabilities and moral corruption in global perspectives on climate engineering. Environmental Values, 26, 757–777.
  • Currie, A., & Lawford-Smith, H. (2017). Accelerating the carbon cycle: The ethics of enhanced weathering. Biology Letters, 13(4), 20160859.
  • Gardiner, S. (2010). Is ‘arming the future’ with geoengineering really the lesser evil? Some doubts about intentionally manipulating the climate system. In S. Gardiner, D. Jamieson, S. Caney, & H. Shue (Eds.), Climate ethics: Essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  284–312.
  • Gardiner, S. (2011). A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
  • Gardiner, S. (2013). The desperation argument for geoengineering. Political Science and Politics, 46(1), 28–33.
  • Gardiner, S., & Fragniere, A. (2018). The tollgate principles for the governance of geoengineering: Moving beyond the oxford principles to an ethically more robust approach. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 12(1), 143–174.
  • Gonzalez-Ricoy, I., & Gosseries, A. (Eds.). (2017). Institutions for future generations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Goodin, R. (2007). Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35(1), 40–68.
  • Horton, J. (2011). Geoengineering and the myth of unilateralism: pressures and prospects for international cooperation. Stanford Journal of Law, Science, and Policy, IV, 56–69.
  • Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion. (2018, June). Statelessness in numbers: 2018. institutesi.org. Retrieved from https://www.institutesi.org/ISI_statistics_analysis_2018.pdf
  • Jones, J. (1996). The effects of non-response on statistical inference. Journal of Health & Social Policy, 8(1), 49–62.
  • Lane, L., & Bickel, E. (2009). Solar radiation management and rethinking the goals of COP-15. Copenhagen Consensus on Climate: Advice for Policymakers (Copenhagen Consensus Centre), 15, 16–19.a.
  • MacMartin, D., Caldeira, & Keith, D. (2014). Solar geoengineering to limit the rate of temperature change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 372(2031), 20140134.
  • MacMartin, D., Ricke, K., & Keith, D. (2018). Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5C Paris target. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376(2119), 20160454.
  • Niemeyer, S., & Jennstal, J. (2017). Youth quotas, diversity, and long-termism. In I. Gonzalez-Ricoy & A. Gosseries (Eds.), Institutions for future generations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 247–265.
  • Oxford Geoengineering Programme. (2009). The principles. geoengineering.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved from http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/oxford-principles/principles/
  • Pasztor, J. (2017, April 25). Rules for geoengineering the planet. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604184/rules-for-geoengineering-the-planet/
  • Pasztor, J, Scharf, C, & Schmidt, K.-U. (2017). How to Govern Geoengineering? Science, 357(6348), 231. doi:10.1126/science.aan6794
  • Qualtrics. (2018, January). Sample size calculator. Retrieved from https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/calculating-sample-size/
  • Smee, B. (2018, May 3). Shift to renewables would save Australians $20bn a year – report. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/03/shift-to-renewables-would-save-australians-20bn-a-year-report
  • Smith, T. (2019). Patrick. ‘legitimacy and non-domination in solar radiation management research’. Ethics, Policy & Environment. [early view].21(3), 341–361.
  • Stanley, J. (2016). How propaganda works. New Haven: Princeton.
  • Trevett, C. (2016, June 15). Cost of flag referendum $4 million under budget. The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11657032
  • Virgoe, J. (2009). International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change. Climatic Change, 95(103), 115–116.
  • Wong, P. H. (2015). Confucian environmental ethics, climate engineering, and the ‘playing god’ argument. Zygon, 50(1), 28–41.
  • Wong, P.-H. (2014). Maintenance required: The ethics of geoengineering and post-implementation scenarios. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 17(2), 186–191.
  • World Health Organization. (2016, May 19). Life expectancy increased by 5 years since 2000, but health inequalities persist.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.