The representative system

References

• Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Almond, G. (1969). Political development: Analytical and normative perspectives. Comparative Political Studies, 1(4), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041406900100401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (2003). Political participation, mass protest and representative democracy. Parliamentary Affairs, 56(4), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsg115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. (2013). The democratic qualities of courts: A critical analysis of three arguments. Representation, 49(3), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2013.830485
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., & Kröger, S. (2013). Representation deficits and surpluses in EU policy- making. Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.799937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, T., Müller, W. C., & Strom, K. (2000). Introduction: Parliamentary democracy and the chain of delegation. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besson, S., & Martí, J. L. (2018). Legitimate actors of international law-making: Towards a theory of international democratic representation. Jurisprudence, 9(3), 504–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2018.1442256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B. (2006). Survey article: Citizen panels and the concept of representation. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglione, D., & Warren, M. E. (2013). A new ecology of democratic representation? Eight theoretical issues. Rivista Di Storia Delle Idee, 2(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.4474/DPS/02/02/MTR86/18
   Google Scholar
• Caughey, D., & Warshaw, C. (2018). Policy Preferences and Policy Change: Dynamic Responsiveness in the American States, 1936 – 2014. American Political Science Review, 1–18. d oi:doi.https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/K3QWZW
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1990). Myth of the Presidential Mandate. Political Science Quarterly, 105(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/2150822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (2006). A preface to democratic theory. Expanded edition. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disch, L. (2011). Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2008). Discursive representation. American Political Science Review, 102(4), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• González-Ricoy, I., & Rey, F. (2019). Enfranchising the future: Climate justice and the representation of future generations. WIREs Climate Change, 10(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.598
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. H. (1945). Opening statement before the international military tribunal. https://www.roberthjackson.org/speech-and-writing/opening-statement-before-the- international-military-tribunal/#:~:text=Jackson%2C Chief of Counsel for,world imposes a grave responsibility.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyper, J. W. (2016). Systemic representation: Democracy, deliberation, and nonelectoral representatives. American Political Science Review, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000095
   Google Scholar
• Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2011). The democratic deficit in the states. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, C., & Spiekermann, K. (2013). Methodological individualism and holism in political science: A reconciliation. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C., & Pollak, J. (2010). The EU’s many representative modes: Colliding? Cohering? Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903464952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2011). Clarifying the concept of representation. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F., & Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2015). Should workers represent workers? Swiss Political Science Review, 21(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2019). Recursive Representation. In D. Catiglione & J. Pollak (Eds.), Creating political presence: The new politics of democratic representation (pp. 298–338). The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in congress. The American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanaro, L. (2017). Who elected Oxfam?: A democratic defence of self-appointed representatives. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Näsström, S. (2011). Where is the representative turn going? European Journal of Political Theory, 10(4), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885111417783
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Innovative citizen participation and new democratic institutions: catching the deliberative wave. h ttps://d oi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.
   Google Scholar
• Page, B. I., & Gilens, M. (2017). Democracy in America?: What has gone wrong and what we can do about it. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J. (Eds). (2012). Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2009). Varieties of Public Representation. In I. Shapiro, S. C. Stokes, E. J. Wood, & A. S. Kirchner (Eds.), Political representation (pp. 61–89). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2012). On the people’s terms: A republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2013). Meritocratic Representation. In D. A. Bell & L. Chenyang (Eds.), The East Asian challenge for democracy: political meritocracy in comparative perspective (pp. 138–158). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1972). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, J. (2014). Compounded representation in the EU: No country for old parliaments? In Political representation in the European Union: Still democratic in times of crisis? (pp. pp. 19–35). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, A. (2006). Towards a general theory of political representation. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00365.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2010). The representative claim. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. (2013). The rule of law and the frankenstate: Why governance checklists do not work. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 26(4), 559–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweber, H. (2016). The limits of political representation. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siskin, C. (2016). System: The shaping of modern knowledge. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degree of democracy: Politics public opinion, and policy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, J. A., Mackuen, M. B., & Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic representation. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausanovitch, C., & Warshaw, C. (2014). Representation in municipal government. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 605–641. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008). The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeule, A. (2011). The system of the constitution. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2008). Citizen representatives. In M. E. Warren & H. Pearse (Eds.), Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia citizens’ assembly (pp. pp. 50–69). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2017). A problem-based approach to democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E., & Pearse, H. (Eds). (2008). Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia citizens’ assembly. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weissberg, R. (1978). Collective vs. Dyadic representation in congress. The American Political Science Review, 72(2), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon, S. L. (2011). When protest makes policy: How social movements represent disadvantaged groups. The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. S. (1998). Voice, trust, and memory: Marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar