Supersession: A reply

References

• Arendt, H. (1977). Truth and politics. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Between past and future: Eight essays in political thought (pp. 223–259). Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, G. (2022). The supersession of Indigenous understandings of justice and morals. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(3), 427–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrix, B. (2022). Supersession, non-ideal theory, and dominant distributive principles. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(3), 395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., & Waligore, T. (2018). Die Aufhebungsthese. Grundlinien einer Theorie des gerechten Umgangs mit historischem Unrecht [The supersession thesis: Principles for a theory for justly dealing with historical injustice]. In F. Dietrich, J. Müller-Salo, & R. Schmücker (Eds.), Zeit – Eine normative Ressource? (pp. 215–230). Vittorio Klostermann. English version on file with authors.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., & Waligore, T. (2022). Superseding historical injustice? New critical assessments. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(3), 319–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero, J. (2022). Colonialism and rights supersession: A Kant-inspired perspective. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(3), 331–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, E. (2022). Indigenous governance now: Settler colonial injustice is not historically past. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(3), 411–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, M. (1982). Property and personhood. Stanford Law Review, 34(5), 957–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, S. (2022). Superseding structural linguistic injustice? Language revitalization and historically-sensitive dignity-based claims. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(3), 347–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinner-Halev, J. (2022). Group agency and the challenges of repairing historical injustice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(3), 380–394.
   Google Scholar
• Truccone-Borgogno, S. (2022). The supersession thesis, climate change, and the rights of future people. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(3), 364–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1988). The right to private property. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1992a). Historic injustice: Its remembrance and supersession. In G. Oddie & R. Perrett (Eds.), Justice, ethics and New Zealand society (pp. 139–170). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1992b). Superseding historic injustice. Ethics, 103(1), 4–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1993). Property, justification and need. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 6(2), 185–215.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1995). What Plato would allow. In I. Shapiro & J. W. DeCew (Eds.), Nomos XXXVII: Theory and Practice (pp. 138–178). New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1998a). The normative resilience of property. Otago Law Review, 9(2), 195–220.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1998b). The right to private property. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2002a). Justice. In I. Katznelson & H. Milner (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 266–285). W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2002b). Redressing historic injustice. University of Toronto Law Journal, 52(1), 135–160.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2003). Indigeneity? First peoples and last occupancy. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 1(1), 55–82.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2004). Settlement, return and the supersession thesis. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 5(2), 237–268.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2005). Nozick and Locke: Filling the space of rights. Social Philosophy & Policy, 22(1), 81–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2006). The half-life of treaties: Waitangi, rebus sic stantibus. Otago Law Review, 11(2), 161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2007). Why is indigeneity important? In J. Miller & R. Kumar (Eds.), Reparations: Interdisciplinary inquiries (pp. 23–42). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2013). Supersession and sovereignty. NYU School of Law, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper No. 13-33 (Julius Stone Address, August 3, 2006). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2205708
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2017). Exclusion: Property analogies in the immigration debate. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 18(2), 469–489.
   Google Scholar