References
- Akaichi, F., & Revoredo-Giha, C. (2016). Consumers demand for products with animal welfare attributes: Evidence from homescan data from Scotland. British Food Journal, 118(7), 1682–1711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2015-0321
- Andrić, V. (2017). How do affected interests support global democracy? Journal of Global Ethics, 13(3), 264–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2018.1425219
- Arrhenius, G. (2019). Democracy for the 21st century: Research challenges. In S. Randeria & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Social science at the crossroads: Annals of the International Institute of Sociology (Vol. 1, pp. Brill). Cited from the online version, available at: https://democracy-for-the-21th-century-research-challenges-in-wittrock-et-al-sociology-looks-at-the-twenty-first-century-aug-2015.pdfiffs.se
- Ball, T. (2006). Democracy. In A. Dobson & R. Eckersley (Eds.), Political theory and the ecological challenge (pp. 131–147). Cambridge University Press.
- Bastian, B., Loughan, S., Haslam, N., & Radke, H. R. M. (2012). Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211424291
- Beckman, L. (2008). Democratic inclusion, law, and causes. Ratio Juris, 21(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2008.00394.x
- Bengtson, A., & Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2021). Why the All-Affected Principle is groundless. Journal of Moral Philosophy. Online first.
- Birch, J. (2022). The search for invertebrate consciousness. Noûs, 56(1), 133–153.
- Boudou, B. (2022). Representing non-citizens: A proposal for the inclusion of all affected interests. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Online first. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2062216
- Brighouse, H., & Fleurbaey, M. (2010). Democracy and proportionality. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00316.x
- Carnovale, F., Jin, X., Arney, D., Descovich, K., Guo, W., Shi, B., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2021). Chinese Public Attitudes towards, and Knowledge of, Animal Welfare. Animals, 11(855), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030855
- Carruthers, P. (1992). The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Caviola, L., Everett, J. A. C., & Faber, N. S. (2019). The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(6), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000182
- Cochrane, A. (2009). Do animals have an interest in liberty? Political Studies, 57(3), 660–679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00742.x
- Cochrane, A. (2018). Sentientist politics: A theory of global inter-Species justice. Oxford University Press.
- Cochrane, A., Garner, R., & O’Sullivan, S. (2018). Animal ethics and the political. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 21(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2016.1194583
- Cornish, A., Raubenheimer, D., & McGreevy, P. (2016). What we know about the public’s level of concern for farm animal welfare in food production in developed countries. Animals, 6(74), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6110074
- Crisp, R. (2017). Well-Being. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall, ed). URL =. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/well-being/
- Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford University Press.
- Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Beyond deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press.
- Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative global politics: Discourse and democracy in a divided world. Polity.
- Eckersley, R. (2000). Deliberative democracy, ecological representation and risk: Towards a democracy of the affected. In M. Saward (Ed.), Democratic innovation: Deliberation, representation and association (pp. 131–146). Routledge.
- Ekeli, K. S. (2009). Constitutional experiments: Representing future generations through submajority rules. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00328.x
- Erman, E. (2014). The boundary problem and the ideal of democracy. Constellations, 21(4), 535–546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12116
- European Commission. (2016). Special Eurobarometer 442 – Report: Attitudes of Europeans towards Animal Welfare. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2096
- Faria, C., & Paez, E. (2015). Animals in need: The problem of wild animal suffering and intervention in nature. Relations, 3(1), 7–13.
- Frey, R. G. (1980). Interests and Rights: The Case Against Animals. Clarendon Press.
- Garner, R. (2016). Animals, politics and democracy. In R. Garner & S. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The political turn in animal ethics (pp. 103–117). Rowman & Littlefield.
- Garner, R. (2017). Animals and democratic theory: Beyond an anthropocentric account. Contemporary Political Theory, 16(4), 459–477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-016-0072-0
- Giroux, V. (2016). Animals do have an interest in liberty. Journal of Animal Ethics, 6(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5406/janimalethics.6.1.0020
- Goodin, R. E. (1996). Enfranchising the Earth, and its alternatives. Political Studies,44, 44(5), 835–849. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00337.x
- Goodin, R. E. (2007). Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(1), 40–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x
- Griffin, J. (1988). Well-Being: Its meaning, measurement and moral Importance. Clarendon Press.
- Hooley, D. (2018). The Political Status of Nonhuman Animals. PhD Thesis: University of Toronto.
- Joy, M. (2009). Why we love dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows: An introduction to carnism. Conari Press.
- Keyssar, A. (2000). The right to vote: The contested history of democracy in the United States [Revised edition]. Basic Books.
- Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2017). How to diagnose democratic deficits in global politics: The use of the ‘all-affected principle’. International Theory, 9(2), 171–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971916000312
- Korsgaard, C. M. (2018). Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. Oxford University Press.
- Lijphart, A., & Grofman, B. (Eds.). (1984). Choosing an electoral system. Praeger.
- López-Guerra, C. (2014). Democracy and Disenfranchisement. Oxford University Press.
- Magaña, P. (Forthcoming). The Political Representation of Nonhuman Animals. Social Theory and Practice.
- Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Føllesdal, A., Fung, A., Lafont, C., Manin, B., & Martí, J.L. (2010). The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy*. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 64–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00344.x
- Meijer, E. (2019). When animals speak: Toward an interspecies democracy. New York University Press.
- Mill, J. ([1828] 1992). Political writings. (B. Terence, Ed. by). Cambridge University Press.
- Näsström, S. (2011). The challenge of the All-Affected Principle. Political Studies, 59(1), 116–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x
- Norwood, B., & Lusk, J. (2011). Compassion, by the pound: The economics of farm animal welfare. Oxford University Press.
- Otjes, S. (2014). Animal Party Politics in Parliament. In D. Schlosberg & M. Wissenburg (Eds.), Political animals and animal politics (pp. 107–122). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Our World in Data. (2021). Number of animals slaughtered for meat, World, 1961 to 2019. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/animals-slaughtered-for-meat?country=~OWID_WRL
- Paez, E. (2021). A republic for all sentients: Social freedom without free will. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly.
- Pepper, A. (2021). Political agency in humans and other animals. Contemporary Political Theory, 20(2), 296–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00430-4
- Peter, F. (2017). Political Legitimacy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Summer Edition https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/legitimacy/
- Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
- Pollan, M. (2006). The omnivore’s dilemma: A natural history of four meals. Penguin Books.
- Rawls, J. ([1993] 1996). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
- Rehfeld, A. (2006). Towards a general theory of political representation. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00365.x
- Riffkin, R. (2015). In U.S., More Say Animals Should Have Same Rights as People. News Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/183275/say-animals-rights-people.aspx
- Ruby, M. B., & Heine, S. J. (2012). Too close to home. Factors predicting meat avoidance. Appetite, 59(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.03.020
- Saward, M. (2010). The Representative Claim. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Schlottmann, C, & Sebo, J. (2020). Food, animals and the environment: An ethical approach. Routledge.
- Schweber, H. (2016). The limits of political representation. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 382–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000137
- Shapiro, I. (2003). The state of democratic theory. Princeton University Press.
- Singer, P. (1979). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
- Smith, K. (2012). Governing animals: Animal welfare and the liberal state. Oxford University Press.
- Song, S. (2009). Democracy and noncitizen voting rights. Citizen Studies, 13(6), 607–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020903309607
- Taylor, K., & Rego Alvarez, L. (2019). An estimate of the number of animals used for scientific purposes worldwide in 2015. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 47(5–6), 196–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261192919899853
- Vink, J. (2020). The Open Society and Its Animals. Palgrave Macmillan.