Digital freedom and corporate power in social media

References

• Anderson, E. (2017). Private government: How employers rule our lives (and why we don’t talk about it). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2014). The big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673–1689. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2161/1163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barwise, P., & Watkins, L. (2018). The evolution of digital dominance: How and why we got to GAFA. In M. Moore & D. Tambini (Eds.), The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple (pp. 21–49). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, S. I., & Benoliel, U. (2021). Law in books and law in action: The readability of privacy policies and the GDPR. In K. Mathis & A. Tor (Eds.), Consumer Law and Economics (pp. 179–204). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celikates, R. (2015). Digital publics, digital contestation: A new structural transformation of the public sphere? In R. Celikates, R. Kreide, & T. Wesche (Eds.), Transformations of democracy: Crisis, protest and legitimation (pp. 159–176). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Christman, J., & Anderson, J. (2005). Introduction. In J. Christman & J. Anderson (Eds.), Autonomy and the challenges to liberalism: New essays (pp. 1–23). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ciepley, D. (2013). Beyond public and private: Toward a political theory of the corporation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coons, C., & Weber, M. (2014). Introduction: Investigating the core concept and its moral status. In C. Coons & M. Weber (Eds.), Manipulation: Theory and practice (pp. 1–16). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Google Scholar
• Dolata, U. (2018). Internet companies: Market concentration, competition and power. In U. Dolata & J.-F. Schrape (Eds.), Collectivity and power on the internet (pp. 85–108). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D. (2007). Business power in global governance. Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2021). Überlegungen und Hypothesen zu einem erneuten Strukturwandel der politischen Öffentlichkeit. In M. Seeliger & S. Sevignani (Eds.), Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit? Leviathan (Vol. 49, pp. 470–500). Nomos. Sonderband 37
   Google Scholar
• Hindman, M. (2018). The internet trap: How the digital economy builds monopolies and undermines democracy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoye, J. M., & Monaghan, J. (2018). Surveillance, freedom and the republic. European Journal of Political Theory, 17(3), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115608783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenk, M. (2022). (Online)manipulation: Sometimes hidden, always careless. Review of Social Economy, 80(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2021.1894350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, G., & Elmer, G. (2019). Impersonal subjectivation from platforms to infrastructures. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F. (2010). A general theory of domination and justice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974/2005). Power: A radical view. Second edition. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McCammon, C. (2015). Domination: A rethinking. Ethics, 125(4), 1028–1052. https://doi.org/10.1086/680906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikler, J. (2018). The political power of global corporations. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: How not to liberate the world. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhäuser, C. (2011). Unternehmen als moralische Akteure. Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2001). A theory of freedom: From the psychology to the politics of agency. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2012). On the people’s terms: A republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2015). Freedom: Psychological, ethical, and political. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18(4), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2015.1033861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2020). The society of singularities. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2015). A republican account of the value of privacy. European Journal of Political Theory, 14(3), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885114533262
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, B. (2021). Autonomy: An essay on the life well lived. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Staab, P. (2019). Digitaler Kapitalismus: Markt und Herrschaft in der Ökonomie der Unknappheit. Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2016). The ethics of influence: Government in the age of behavioral science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susser, D., Roessler, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (2019). Online manipulation: Hidden influences in a digital world. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 4(1), 1–45. https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/4.1-p1-45-Susser.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, T. (2017). Digitalisierung als Kontext politischen Handelns. Republikanische Perspektiven auf die digitale Transformation der Gegenwart. In D. Jacob & T. Thiel (Eds.), Politische Theorie und Digitalisierung (pp. 189–215). Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wettstein, F. (2009). Multinational corporations and global justice: Human rights obligations of a quasi-governmental institution. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. W. (2014). Coercion, manipulation, exploitation. In C. Coons & M. Weber (Eds.), Manipulation: Theory and practice (pp. 17–50). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.
   Google Scholar