3,430
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Research Brokers, Researcher Identities and Affective Performances: The Insider/Outsider Conundrum

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahmed, S., 2004. The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Al Jazeera. 30 December 2017. At least 81 journalists killed in 2017: report. Al Jazeera News, Last Modified 31 Dec, 2017. Available from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/12/81-journalists-killed-2017-report-171231074521039.html [Accessed 10 July].
  • Ayata, B., et al., 2019. Interviews as situated affective encounters: a relational and processual approach for empirical research on affect, emotion and politics. In: A. Kahl, ed.. Analyzing affective societies: methods and methodologies. London; New York: Routledge, 63–77.
  • Bush, K. and Duggan, C., 2013. Evaluation in conflict zones: methodological and ethical challenges. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 8 (2), 5–25. doi:10.1080/15423166.2013.812891
  • Crawford, G., et al., 2017. Understanding global development research: fieldwork issues, experiences and reflections. London: Sage.
  • Duggan, C. and Bush, K., 2014. The ethical tipping points of evaluators in conflict zones. American Journal of Evaluation, 35 (4), 485–506. doi:10.1177/1098214014535658
  • Featherman, D.L. and Vinovskis, M.A., 2001. Social science and policy-making: a search for relevance in the twentieth century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Figueira, D.M., 2008. Otherwise occupied: pedagogies of alterity and the brahminization of theory. Albany: State University of New York Press. ©2008. Book.
  • Fisk, R., 1990. Pity the nation: the abduction of Lebanon. New York: Atheneum.
  • Fisk, R., 2007. The great war for civilisation: the conquest of the Middle East. New York: Vintage.
  • Giwa, A., 2015. Insider/outsider issues for development researchers from the global south. Geography Compass, 9 (6), 316–326. doi:10.1111/gec3.12219
  • Hage, G., 2006. Insiders and outsiders. In: P. Beilharz and T. Hogan, eds. Sociology: place, time and division. Melbourne: Oxford University Press Oxford, 342–345.
  • Hancock, M., 1998. Unmaking the ‘great tradition’: ethnography, national culture and area studies. Identities Global Studies in Culture and Power, 4 (3–4), 343–388.
  • Helbardt, S., Hellmann-Rajanayagam, D., and Korff, R., 2010. War’s dark glamour: ethics of research in war and conflict zones. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23 (2), 349–369. doi:10.1080/09557571003752688
  • Hoffman, D. and Tarawalley, M., 2014. Frontline collaborations: the research relationship in unstable places. Ethnography, 15 (3), 291–310. doi:10.1177/1466138114533463
  • Jackson, N., 2003. Introduction to brokering in higher education. In: N. Jackson, ed. Engaging and changing higher education through brokerage. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 3–20.
  • Lunn, J., (Ed.), 2014. Field work in the global South: ethical challenges and dilemmas. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Jentsch, B. and Pilley, C., 2003. Research relationships between the South and the North: cinderella and the ugly sisters? Social Science & Medicine, 57 (10), 1957–1967. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00060-1
  • Lewis, D. and Mosse, D., 2006. Development brokers and translators: the ethnography of aid and agencies. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press. 2006. Book.
  • Maira, S., 2009. “Good” and “bad” muslim citizens: feminists, terrorists, and U.S. orientalisms. Feminist Studies, 35 (3), 631–656.
  • Malejacq, R. and Mukhopadhyay, D., 2016. The ‘tribal politics’ of field research: a reflection on power and partiality in 21st-century warzones. Perspectives on Politics, 14 (4), 1011–1028. doi:10.1017/S1537592716002899
  • Malejacq, R. and Mukhopadhyay, D. 2017. Yes, it’s possible to do research in conflict zones. This is how. The Washington Post, 5 Apr, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/04/05/yes-its-possible-to-do-research-in-conflict- zones-this-is-how/?utm_term=.9de2e800aa4f [Accessed 15 July 2018].
  • Malik, N. 2018. Islam’s new ‘native informants’. The New York Review of Books, 7 June, 2018. https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/06/07/islams-new-native-informants/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_c ampaign=Feed%3A+nybooks+%28The+New+York+Review+of+Boo ks%29 [Accessed 15 July 2018].
  • Massumi, B., 2015. Politics of affect. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • McLaughlin, G., 2016. The war correspondent. London: Pluto Press.
  • Merriam, S.B., et al., 2001. Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20 (5), 405–416. doi:10.1080/02601370120490
  • Meyer, M., 2010. The rise of the knowledge broker. Science Communication, 32 (1), 118–127. doi:10.1177/1075547009359797
  • Middleton, T. and Cons, J., 2014. Coming to terms: reinserting research assistants into ethnography’s past and present. UK: London, England: Sage Publications.
  • Montsion, J.M., 2018. Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 5 (1), 1–21. doi:10.1186/s40711-018-0079-4
  • Parashar, S., 2011. Embodied ‘otherness’ and negotiations of difference: a critical self reflection on the politics of emotions in researching militant women. International Studies Review, 13 (4), 687–708.
  • Parashar, S., 2014. Women and militant wars: the politics of injury. London: Routledge.
  • Parashar, S., 2015. Masquerading Maoists and the politics of securitisation. In: C. Sylvester, ed. Masquerades of war. London/New York: Routledge, 79–94.
  • Pink, S., 2009. Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage Publications.
  • Pratap, A., 2002. Island of blood: frontline reports from Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and other South Asian flashpoints. UK: Penguin.
  • Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I.S., 2005. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. London: Sage Publications.
  • Sangarasivam, Y., 2001. Researcher, informant,“assassin,” me. Geographical Review, 91 (1–2), 95–104. doi:10.2307/3250809
  • Savvides, N., et al., 2014. Journeys into inner/outer space: reflections on the methodological challenges of negotiating insider/outsider status in international educational research. Research in Comparative and International Education, 9 (4), 412–425. doi:10.2304/rcie.2014.9.4.412
  • Schiltz, J. and Büscher, K., 2018. Brokering research with war-affected people: the tense relationship between opportunities and ethics. Ethnography, 19 (1), 124–146. doi:10.1177/1466138116664542
  • Sharma, S., 2018. Me again: fieldwork, practice and returning. Area. doi:10.1111/area.12493
  • Sherman-Heyl, B., 2001. Ethnographic interviewing. In: P. Atkinson, et al., eds. Handbook of ethnography. London: Sage Publications, 369–383.
  • Srivastava, P., 2006. Reconciling multiple researcher positionalities and languages in international research. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1 (3), 210–222. doi:10.2304/rcie.2006.1.3.210
  • Sultana, F., 2007. Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International E-journal for Critical Geographies, 6 (3), 374–385.
  • Sundquist, J.L., 1978. Research brokerage: the weak link. In: E.L. Laurence Jr., ed. Knowledge and policy: the uncertain connection. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 126–144.
  • Sylvester, C., 2011. The forum: emotion and the feminist ir researcher. International Studies Review, 13 (4), 687–708. doi:10.1111/misr.2011.13.issue-4
  • Sylvester, C., 2015. Masquerades of war. London and New York: Routledge.
  • The Guardian. 26 May 2016. “Humanitarian official effectively expelled from Sudan, says UN.” 10 Aug, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2016/may/23/un-humanitarian-official-effectively- expelled-sudan [Accessed 26 May 2016]