‘Proxy War’ - A Reconceptualisation

References

• Abbott, K.W., et al., 2020. Competence versus Control: the Governor’s Dilemma. Regulation and Governance, 14 (4), 619–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, K., 2001. Natural Language Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., 2019. Competitive intervention, protracted conflict, and the global prevalence of civil war. International Studies Quarterly, 63 (3), 692–706. doi:10.1093/isq/sqz037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arieff, A., 2018. Democratic Republic of Congo: background and U.S. Relations. Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service. R43166.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., 2017. CivilWars. A History in Ideas. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balch-Lindsay, D., Enterline, A.J., and Joyce, K.A., 2008. Third-party Intervention and the civil war process. Journal of Peace Research, 45 (3), 345–363. doi:10.1177/0022343308088815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkawi, T., 2016. Decolonising War. European Journal of International Security, 1 (2), 199–214. doi:10.1017/eis.2016.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Siman Tov, Y., 1984. The strategy of war by proxy. Cooperation and Conflict, 19, 263–273. doi:10.1177/001083678401900405
   Google Scholar
• Beehner, L., 2015. How proxy wars work. Foreign Affairs, 12 November.
   Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, F., ed., 2016. Concepts in world politics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. and Kedar, A., 2008. Concept formation in political science: an anti-naturalist critique of qualitative methodology. Perspectives on Politics, 6 (3), 503–517. doi:10.1017/S1537592708081255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghard, D. E., 2014. Friends with Benefits? Power and Influence in Proxy Warfare. Thesis (PhD) Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, C.G., 2011. Peril by proxy: negotiating conflicts in East Africa. International Negotiation, 16, 137–167. doi:10.1163/157180611X553908
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., 2016. Purposes and pitfalls of war by proxy: a systemic analysis. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27 (3), 243–257. doi:10.1080/09592318.2015.1134047
   Google Scholar
• Byman, D., et al., 2001. Trends in outside support for insurgent movements. California, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Byman, D., 2008. The changing nature of state sponsorship of terrorism. Brookings Analysis Paper 16.
   Google Scholar
• Byman, D., 2020. Understanding, and misunderstanding, state sponsorship of terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–19. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2020.1738682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D. and Levitsky, S., 2009. Democracy: conceptual hierarchies in comparative research. In: D. Collier and J. Gerring, eds. Concepts and Method in Social Science. The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. London: Routledge, 269–288.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D. and Mahon, J., 1993. Conceptual ‘stretching’ revisited: adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87 (4), 845–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormac, R., 2018. Disrupt and Deny. Spies, Special Forces, and the Secret Pursuit of British Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cragin, K.R., 2015. Semi-Proxy Wars and U.S. Counterterrorism Strategy. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38 (5), 311–327. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2015.1018024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Soysa, I., 2017. Proxy wars: implications of great-power rivalry for the onset and duration of civil war. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-526 [Accessed 21 February 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Dunér, B., 1981. Proxy intervention in civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 18 (4), 353–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazal, T.M. and Post, P., 2019. War is not over. Foreign Affairs, 15 October.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, G., 2000. Linguistic terms and concepts. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Findley, M.G. and Teo, T.K., 2006. Rethinking third‐party interventions into civil wars: an actor‐centric approach. Journal of Politics, 68 (4), 828–837. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00473.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, A.C., 2019. In Pursuit of a General Theory of Proxy Warfare. Land Warfare Paper. 123.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A.C., 2020. Five models of strategic relationship in proxy war. Georgetown Security Studies Review, 8 (2), 50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J., 1999. What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity, 31 (3), 357–393. doi:10.2307/3235246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, K.S., 2007. Transnational dimensions of civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 44 (3), 293–309. doi:10.1177/0022343307076637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, K.S. and Beardsley, K., 2004. Nosy neighbours: third-party actors in Central American conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48 (3), 379–402. doi:10.1177/0022002704263710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, K.S., Salehyan, I., and Schultz, K., 2008. Fighting at home, fighting abroad: how civil wars lead to international disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52 (4), 479–506. doi:10.1177/0022002707313305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, C., 1999. Semantic analysis. A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, G., 2006. Social Science Concepts. A User’s Guide. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grauer, R. and Tierney, D., 2018. The arsenal of insurrection: explaining rising support for rebels. Security Studies, 27 (2), 263–295. doi:10.1080/09636412.2017.1386936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groh, T.L., 2019. Proxy War. The least bad option. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S., 2005. The concept of power: a constructivist analysis. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33 (3), 495–521. doi:10.1177/03058298050330031301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S., 2013. The ends of international relations theory: stages of reflexivity and modes of theorizing. European Journal of International Relations, 19 (3), 521–541. doi:10.1177/1354066113494327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauter, J., 2019. Delegated interstate war: introducing an addition to armed conflict typologies. Journal of Strategic Security, 12 (4), 90–103. doi:10.5038/1944-0472.12.4.1756
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, B., 2014. Introduction: exploring the jungle of terminology. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 25 (4), 741–753. doi:10.1080/09592318.2013.832928
   Google Scholar
• Hinnebusch, R. and Saouli, A., 2020. The War for Syria. Regional and International Dimensions of the Syrian Uprising. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, G., 2012. My enemy’s enemy: proxy warfare in international politics. Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, M.A., ed. 2012. Making sense of proxy wars: states, surrogates and the use of force. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S.G., 2017. Waging Insurgent Warfare. Lessons from the Vietcong to the Islamic State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S.G., 2018. Al-Qaeda’s quagmire in Syria. Survival, 60 (5), 181–198. doi:10.1080/00396338.2018.1518381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2009. Civil wars. In: C. Boix and S.C. Stokes, eds. The Oxford handbook of comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 416–434.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2013. The changing character of civil wars, 1800-2009. In: H. Strachan and S. Scheipers, eds. The changing character of war. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 202–219.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2019. The landscape of political violence. In: E. Chenoweth, et al., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N. and Balcells, L., 2010. International system and technologies of rebellion: how the end of the cold war shaped internal conflict. American Political Science Review, 104 (3), 415–429. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlén, N., 2016. Historical trends in external support in civil wars. In: SIPRI, ed. SIPRI Yearbook 2016: armaments, Disarmaments, and International Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Karlén, N., 2017a. The legacy of foreign patrons: external state support and conflict recurrence. Journal of Peace Research, 54 (4), 499–512. doi:10.1177/0022343317700465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlén, N., 2017b. Sponsors of War: State Support for Rebel Groups in Civil Conflicts. Thesis (PhD) Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Krieg, A. and Rickli, J.M., 2018. Surrogate warfare: the art of war in the 21st century? Defence Studies, 18 (2), 113–130. doi:10.1080/14702436.2018.1429218
   Google Scholar
• Leeds, B., et al. 2002. Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815-1944. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations, 28 (3), 237–260. doi:10.1080/03050620213653
   Google Scholar
• Loveman, C., 2002. Assessing the phenomenon of proxy intervention. Conflict, Security and Development, 2 (3), 29–48. doi:10.1080/14678800200590618
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, J., 2019. After interventionism: a typology of united states strategies. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 30 (3), 576–601. doi:10.1080/09592296.2019.1641927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A., 2016. From civil war to proxy war: past history and current dilemmas. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27 (2), 183–195. doi:10.1080/09592318.2015.1129172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghadam, A. and Wyss, M., 2018. Five Myths about sponsor-proxy relationships. Lawfare, 16 December.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, A. and Wyss, M., 2020. The political power of proxies: why nonstate actors use local surrogates. International Security, 44 (4), 119–157. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, A., 2013. Proxy warfare. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, G.O., 2014. Fighting terrorism in Africa by proxy: the USA and the European Union in Somalia and Mali. European Security, 23 (3), 290–306. doi:10.1080/09662839.2014.884074
   Google Scholar
• Oxnevad, I., 2020. Beyond a Desert Revolt: TE Lawrence’s Theory of Proxy War and State Creation. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–19. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2020.1723283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, G. and Morgan, T.C., 2006. A Theory of Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, F.S., 1974. Foreign military interventions and domestic disputes. International Studies Quarterly, 18 (3), 259–290. doi:10.2307/2600156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrova, M.G., 2019. What matters is who supports you: diaspora and foreign states as external supporters and militants’ adoption of nonviolence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63 (9), 2155–2179. doi:10.1177/0022002719826645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, T., Högbladh, S., and Öberg, M., 2019. Organized Violence, 1989–2018 and peace agreements. Journal of Peace Research, 56 (4), 589–603. doi:10.1177/0022343319856046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaff, C.A., 2017. Proxy War Ethics. Journal of National Security Law and Policy, 9, 305–353.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. and Valbjørn, M., 2018. ‘What is in a Name?’: the Role of (Different) Identities in the multiple proxy wars in Syria. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 29 (3), 414–433. doi:10.1080/09592318.2018.1455328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, J. and Kisangani, E.F., 2009. The international military intervention dataset: an updated resource for conflict scholars. Journal of Peace Research, 46 (4), 589–599. doi:10.1177/0022343309334634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plett Usher, B., 2014. Joe Biden apologised over IS remarks, but was he right? BBC, 7 October.
   Google Scholar
• Popovic, M., 2019. Inter-Rebel Alliances in the Shadow of Foreign Sponsors. International Interactions. Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations., 44 (4), 749–776.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., 2019. Yemen’s Houthi rebels raise nearly $300,000 for Hezbollah. The National, 22 June.
   Google Scholar
• Rauta, V., 2016. Proxy agents, auxiliary forces, and sovereign defection: assessing the outcomes of using non-state actors in civil conflicts. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16 (1), 91–111. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1148416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, V., 2018. A structural-relational analysis of party dynamics in proxy wars. International Relations, 32 (4), 449–647. doi:10.1177/0047117818802436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, V., 2019. Conceptualising the regular-irregular engagement: the strategic value of proxies and auxiliaries in wars amongst the people. In: D. Brown, et al., ed. War amongst the People. Havant: Howgate Publishing Limited, 101–124.
   Google Scholar
• Rauta, V., 2020a. Proxy Warfare and the Future of Conflict: take Two. The RUSI Journal, 165 (2), 1–10. doi:10.1080/03071847.2020.1736437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, V., 2020b. Framers, founders, and reformers: three generations of proxy war research. Contemporary Security Policy, 1–22. doi:10.1080/13523260.2020.1800240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauta, V. and Mumford, A., 2017. Proxy wars and the contemporary security environment. In: R. Dover, H. Dylan, and M.S. Goodman, eds.The Palgrave Handbook of Security, Risk, and Intelligence. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, P.M., 1996. Conditions of successful third-party intervention in intrastate conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40 (2), 336–359. doi:10.1177/0022002796040002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, P.M., 1998. Choosing to intervene. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60 (3), 754–779.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, P.M., 2000. Civil wars and foreign powers: outside interventions and intrastate conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, P.M., 2010. Interventions into civil wars: a retrospective survey with prospective ideas. Civil Wars, 12 (4), 456–476. doi:10.1080/13698249.2010.534632
   Google Scholar
• Regan, P.M. and Aydin, A., 2005. Diplomacy and other forms of intervention in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50 (5), 736–756. doi:10.1177/0022002706291579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, I., 2019. Raison d’Etat: Richelieu’s Grand Strategy during the Thirty Years’ War. Texas National Security Review, 2, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., 2019. Targeting and resistance: reassessing the effect of external support on the duration and outcome of armed conflict. Civil Wars, 21 (3), 362–384. doi:10.1080/13698249.2019.1648631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhi, M., 2018. US-Iran Tensions and the Oil Factor. Survival, 60 (5), 33–40. doi:10.1080/00396338.2018.1518367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubright, R., 2016. The U.S. strategic paradox, third-party proxies, and special operations forces. Special Operations Journal, 2 (2), 135–145. doi:10.1080/23296151.2016.1239986
   Google Scholar
• Salehyan, I., 2010. The Delegation of War to Rebel Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54 (3), 493–515. doi:10.1177/0022002709357890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehyan, I., Gleditsch, K.S., and Cunningham, D.E., 2011. Explaining external support for insurgent groups. International Organization, 65 (4), 709–744. doi:10.1017/S0020818311000233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehyan, I., Siroky, D., and Wood, R.M., 2014. External Rebel sponsorship and civilian abuse: a principal–agent analysis of wartime atrocities. International Organization, 68 (3), 633–661. doi:10.1017/S002081831400006X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San-Akca, B., 2016. States in Disguise: Causes of State Support for Rebel Groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• San-Akca, B., 2017. States and Nonstate Armed Groups (NAGs) in International Relations Theory. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-303?rskey=m3kI0W&result=1 [Accessed 21 February 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G., 1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64, 1033–1053. doi:10.2307/1958356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G., 2009a. Guidelines for Concept Analysis. In: D. Collier and J. Gerring, eds. Concepts and Method in Social Science. The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. London: Routledge, 97–150.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G., 2009b. Comparing and Miscomparing. In: D. Collier and J. Gerring, eds.. Concepts and Method in Social Science. The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. London: Routledge, 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K., Gallagher Cunningham, K., and Reed, W., 2017. The role of external support in civil war termination. Journal of Conflict Research, 61 (6), 1174–1202. doi:10.1177/0022002715600761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheipers, S., 2015. Unlawful Combatants: A Genealogy of the Irregular Fighter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J.D., 2002. The future practice and study of war. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 19 (1), 81–110. doi:10.1177/073889420201900106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S., 1995. The self-image of a discipline: a genealogy of international relations theory. In: K. Booth and S. Smith, eds. International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sozer, B., 2016. Development of proxy relationships: a case study of the Lebanese civil war. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27 (4), 636–658. doi:10.1080/09592318.2016.1189495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stambøl, E.M., 2016. EU initiatives along the ‘cocaine routes’ to Europe: fighting drug trafficking and terrorism by proxy? Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27 (2), 302–324. doi:10.1080/09592318.2016.1151534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, J.A., 2019. Terrorism, civil war, and insurgency. In: E. Chenoweth, et al., ed.. The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 348–365.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, D., 2019. How do we move beyond ‘Proxy’ paralysis? New America, 7 March.
   Google Scholar
• Tamm, H., 2014. The costs and benefits of intervention by proxy. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 8 (4), 381–386. doi:10.1080/17502977.2014.964456
   Google Scholar
• Tamm, H., 2016. The Origins of Transnational Alliances. International Security, 41 (1), 147–181. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamm, H., 2019. Status Competition in Africa: explaining the Rwandan–Ugandan Clashes in the Democratic Republic of Congo. African Affairs, 118 (472), 509–530. doi:10.1093/afraf/ady057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, H.K., 1989. Foreign overt military intervention in the nuclear war. Journal of Peace Research, 26 (2), 179–196. doi:10.1177/0022343389026002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, H.K. and Van Wingen, J.R., 1982. Law and Power in Military Intervention: major States after World War II. International Studies Quarterly, 26 (2), 220–250. doi:10.2307/2600650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, T., 2018. Vicarious Warfare: the Counterproductive Consequences of Modern American Military Practice. Contemporary Security Policy, 39 (2), 181–205. doi:10.1080/13523260.2017.1393201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrey, F., 2014. Is Libya a Proxy War? The Washington Post. 24 October.
   Google Scholar
• White House 2019. ‘Statement from the National Security Advisor Ambassador John Bolton’, Washington, 5 May.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, M.Y., 1997. Explaining U.S. Intervention in Third World Internal Wars, 1945–1989. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41 (4), 580–602. doi:10.1177/0022002797041004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar