A ‘superstorm’: when moral panic and new risk discourses converge in the media

References

• Altheide, D.L., 2009. Moral panic: from sociological concept to public discourse. Crime media culture, 5 (79), 79–99.
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D.L. and Snow, R.P., 1979. Media logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, C., 1999. Stop GM Foods: what does it mean? How is it done? Is it safe? Independent on Sunday, 7 Feb, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, A. and Lo, H., 1999. Oral evidence to house of commons science and technology committee scientific advisory system: genetically modified food. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W., 2002. Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: a cultivation analysis. Public understanding of science, 11 (3), 93–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 1986. Risk society: towards a new modernity. Translated by M. Ritter. Reprint. London: Sage, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 1999. World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 2000. Risk society revisited. In: B. Adam, U. Beck, and J. Van Loon, eds. The risk society and beyond: critical issues for social theory. London: Sage, 211–229.
   Google Scholar
• Beland, D., 2011. The unhealthy risk society: health scares and the politics of moral panic. In: S. Hier, ed. Panic and the politics of anxiety. London: Routledge, 224–236. 
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M., 1987. Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, T., 2000. GM foods – we stand firm. Daily Telegraph, 21 Feb, p. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., 2006. Risk versus need in revising the 1983 mental health act: conflicting claims, muddled policy. Health, risk & society, 8 (4), 343–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, 1999. Advisory and regulatory framework for biotechnology: report from the government’s review. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., 1972 (2002). Folk devils and moral panics: the creation of the mods and rockers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., 2011. Whose side were we on? The undeclared politics of moral panic theory. Crime, media, culture, 7 (3), 237–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottle, S., 1998. Ulrich beck, ‘risk society’ and the media: a catastrophic view? European journal of communication, 13 (1), 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critcher, C., 2003. Critical readings: moral panics. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Critcher, C., 2009. Widening the focus moral panics as moral regulation. British journal of criminology, 49 (1), 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critcher, C., 2011. For a political economy of moral panics. Crime, media, culture, 7 (3), 259–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily Mail, 1998a. Why prince Charles is right to speak out. Daily Mail, 8 Jun, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Mail, 1998b. Dangerous food. Daily Mail, 11 Aug, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Mail, 1999a. Food in the shadow of Dr Frankenstein. Daily Mail, 4 Feb, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Mail, 1999b. An issue of concern to every reader. Daily Mail, 6 Feb, p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Mail, 1999c. Politics, trust and the safety of food. Daily Mail, 17 Feb, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Mail, 1999d. Welcome retreat on modified crops. Daily Mail, 15 Mar, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Mirror, 1999a. Monster food ban. Daily Mirror, 20 Jan, p. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Mirror, 1999b. Label Frankenstein food: mirror’s ‘label it all’ plea. Daily Mirror, 15 Feb, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Mirror, 1999c. Voice of the mirror: just unpalatable. Daily mirror, 15 Feb, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• David, M., et al., 2011. The idea of moral panic – ten dimensions of dispute. Crime media and culture, 7 (3) 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A., 1983. Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eilders, C., 2002. Conflict and consonance in media opinion: political positions of five German quality newspapers. European journal of communication, 17 (1), 25–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Express, 1998a. Food safety’s hard to swallow. Express, 9 June, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Express, 1998b. The hidden dangers of ‘Frankenstein food’. Express, 29 Jun, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Express, 1998c. End doubts on food safety. Express, 10 Aug, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Express, 1998d. Was professor right? Express, 14 Aug, p. 25.
   Google Scholar
• Express, 1999a. We must give a lead over GM Foods. Express, 13 Feb, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Express, 1999b. GM food: act now to avoid a bitter harvest. Express, 17 May, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Firmstone, J., 2008. The editorial production process and editorial values as influences on the opinions of the British press towards Europe. Journalism practice, 2 (2), 212–229.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D., 2008. On the concept of moral panic. Crime media culture, 4, 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genewatch, 1998. Briefing 1: genetically modified food: will labelling provide choice? Lancaster: Genewatch.
   Google Scholar
• Genewatch, 2000. GM crops and food: a review of developments in 1999. Lancaster: Genewatch.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, E. and Ben-Yehuda, N., 1994. Moral panics: the social construction of deviance. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Greenslade, R., 2004. Press gang: how newspapers make profits from propaganda. Oxford: Pan Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• The Grocer, 1998. Monsanto hit by ‘pure vitriol’. The Grocer, 25 Jul, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., et al., 1978. Policing the crisis – mugging, the state and law and order. New York, NY: Holmes and Meier.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, T., 1997. Baked genes; scientists create supernosh; scientists create designer food through genetic modification. Mirror, 21 Nov, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, T., 1998. Genetic crop scare scientist suspended. Mirror, 13 Aug, p. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Hier, S.P., 2003. Risk and panic in late modernity: implications of the converging sites of social anxiety. British journal of sociology, 54 (1), 3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hier, S.P., ed. 2011. Moral panic and the politics of anxiety. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., James, O., and Scott, C., 2000. Regulation of government: has it increased, is it increasing, should it be diminished? Public administration, 78 (2), 283–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee, 2000. Science and society. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, A., 2010. Contested processes, contested influence: a case study of genetically modified food in Britain. In: K. Voltmer and S. Koch-Baumgarten, eds. Public policy and the mass media: the interplay of mass communication and political decision making. London: Routledge, 143–161. 
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, A., 2012. Participatory politics, environmental journalism and newspaper campaigns. Journalism studies, 13 (2), 210–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, A., 2013. The weakest link in existing studies: media-government risk interactions. Journal of risk research, 16 (1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Independent on Sunday, 1999a. Act now on GM. Independent on Sunday, 7 Feb, p. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Independent on Sunday, 1999b Just two things. Independent on Sunday, 21 Feb, p. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Independent on Sunday, 1999c. Second helping. Independent on Sunday, 14 Feb, p. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Independent on Sunday, 2000. Mr Blair’s politically modified line on GM food is a welcome U-turn. Independent on Sunday, 28 Feb, p. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Ingham, J., 1998. Professor who exposed food risk is sacked. Express, 13 Aug, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., 2001. Sociology and the environment: a critical introduction to society, nature and knowledge. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, R. and Hayes, D., 1998. Charles warns against genetic foods: ‘We could face BSE style disaster.’ Daily Mail, 8 Jun, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J., 1999. Researching risk and the media. Health, risk & society, 1 (1), 55–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. and Reilly, J., 1997. The rise and fall of risk reporting media coverage of human genetics research, false memory syndrome ‘and mad cow disease’. European journal of communication, 12 (3), 319–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lean, G., 1997. Designer gene fails farmers. Independent on Sunday, 23 Nov, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Lean, G., 1999. Consumer power: the humbling of a GM Giant. Independent on Sunday, 3 Oct, p. 18.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, T., 1998. Frankenstein monsters. Mirror, 7 Sept, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Mairal, G., 2011. The history and narrative of risk in the media. Health risk & society, 13 (1), 65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., 2003. Exploring media discourses. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, B., 2000. Journalism and democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. and Thornton, S.L., 1995. Rethinking ‘moral panic’ for multi-mediated social worlds. British journal of sociology, 46, 559–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. and Reilly, J., 1995. Making an issue of food safety: the media, pressure groups and the public sphere. In: D. Maurer and J. Sobal, eds. Eating agendas: food, eating and nutrition as social problems. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter, 305–336. 
   Google Scholar
• Millstone, E. and Van Zwanenberg, P., 2005. BSE: risk, science, and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock, G., Petts, J., and Horlick-Jones, T., 2003. After amplification: rethinking the role of the media in risk communication. In: N. Pidgeon, R.E. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, eds. Social amplification of risk. London: Cambridge University Press, 156–178.
   Google Scholar
• Poulter, S., 1998. Potato that promises a lower-fat chip. Daily Mail, 6 Jan, p. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Poulter, S., 1999. 1m Mutant animals in GM experiments. Daily Mail, 16 Mar, p. 27.
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C., ed., 2003. Environmental protest in western Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, K., 1998. Moral panic. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tulloch, J.C. and Zinn, J.O., 2011. Editorial: risk, health and the media. Health, risk & society, 13 (1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar, S., 2001. Moral panic versus the risk society: the implications of the changing sites of social anxiety. British journal of sociology, 52 (2), 271–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zwanenberg, P. and Millstone, E., 2003. BSE: a paradigm of policy failure. The political quarterly, 74 (1), 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, J., 2008. The constitution of risk communication in advanced liberal societies. Risk analysis, 28 (6), 1619–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E., 1997. What are we really eating? Express, 14 Jan, pp. 49–50.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J., 2009. Moral panic: its origins in resistance, ressentiment and the translation of fantasy into reality. British journal of criminology, 49 (1), 4–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J., 2008. Social theories of risk and uncertainty: an introduction. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar