Strategies for dismissing dietary risks: insights from user-generated comments online

References

• Anderson, A.A., et al., 2013. The ‘nasty effect’: online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of computer-mediated communication. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R.S., 2001. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? British medical journal, 322, 1115–1117. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., et al., 2011. Development of strategies for effective communication of food risks and benefits across Europe: design and conceptual framework of the FoodrisC project. BMC public health, 11. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezreh, T., et al., 2012. Challenges to physician–patient communication about medication use: a window into the skeptical patient’s world. Patient preference and adherence, 6, 11–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3, 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. 2013. Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research. INF206/1.2013. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Busby, J., Alcock, R.E., and MacGillivray, B.H., 2009. Interrupting the social amplification of risk process: a case study in collective emissions reduction. Environmental science & policy, 12, 297–308. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, J. and Duckett, D., 2012. Social risk amplification as an attribution: the case of zoonotic disease outbreaks. Journal of risk research, 15 (9), 1049–1074. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.670130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, J. and Onggo, S., 2013. Managing the social amplification of risk: a simulation of interacting actors. Journal of the operational research society, 64, 638–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carslaw, N., 2008. Communicating risks linked to food – the media’s role. Trends in food science & technology, 19, S14–S17. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2008.06.007.
   Google Scholar
• Chmiel, A., et al., 2010. Negative emotions boost users activity at BBC forum. Physica A: statistical mechanics and its applications, 11. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.03.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brún, A., et al., 2014. Weight stigma and narrative resistance evident in online discussions of obesity. Appetite, 72, 73–81. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, S., Bear, C., and Walker, G., 2008. Understanding and (dis)trusting food assurance schemes: consumer confidence and the ‘knowledge fix’. Journal of rural studies, 24, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, B., 2011. Tobacco plain packaging legislation: a content analysis of commentary posted on Australian online news. Tobacco control, 20, 361–366. doi:10.1136/tc.2011.042986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, N.M., Champion, C.C., and Spence, J.C., 2012. Qualitative content analysis of online news media coverage of weight loss surgery and related reader comments. Clinical obesity, 2, 125–131. doi:10.1111/cob.12000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg, J.P. and Sliwa, S.A., 2011. Getting balanced nutrition messages across: communicating actionable nutrition messages: challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the nutrition society, 70, 26–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., et al., 2003. Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 41 (2), 111–121. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00079-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, B.J., et al., 2009. Communicating with the public during health crises: experts’ experiences and opinions. Journal of risk research, 12 (6), 793–807. doi:10.1080/13669870802648486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T. and Prades, A., 2009. On interpretative risk perception research: some reflections on its origins; its nature; and its possible applications in risk communication practice. Health, risk & society, 11 (5), 409–430. doi:10.1080/13698570903180448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., and Kitzinger, J., 2007. Bricolage in action: learning about, making sense of, and discussing, issues about genetically modified crops and food. Health, risk & society, 9 (1), 83–103. doi:10.1080/13698570601181623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., and Koteyko, N., 2012. Contesting science by appealing to its norms: readers discuss climate science in the daily mail. Science communication, 35 (3), 383–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J.D., 2008. Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: effects of hedging on scientists’ and journalists credibility. Human communication research, 34, 347–369. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00324.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, H., 2002. Representations of health risks: what social psychology can offer health promotion. Health education journal, 61 (2), 153–165. doi:10.1177/001789690206100206.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R.E., 1992. The social amplification of risk: progress in developing an integrative framework. In: S. Krimsky and D. Golding, eds. Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Praeger, 153–178.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R.E., et al., 1988. The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk analysis, 8, 177–187. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J., 1999. Researching risk and the media. Health, risk & society, 1 (1), 55–69.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, T. and Barnett, J., 2010. Perceived efficacy and attitudes towards genetic science and science governance. Public understanding of science, 19 (4), 386–402. doi:10.1177/0963662509352952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R., et al., 2004. Psychological research online: report of Board of scientific affairs advisory group on the conduct of research on the internet. American psychologist, 59 (2), 105–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krotoski, A.K., 2012. Data-driven research: open data opportunities for growing knowledge, and ethical issues that arise. Insights, 24 (1), 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Laslo, E., Baram-Tsabari, A., and Lewenstein, B.V., 2011. A growth medium for the message: online science journalism affordances for exploring public discourse of science and ethics. Journalism, 12, 847–870. doi:10.1177/1464884911412709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. and Chapman, S., 1995. A healthy lifestyle might be the death of you’: discourses on diet, cholesterol control and heart disease in the press and among the lay public. Sociology of health & illness, 17 (4), 477–494. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep10932547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcu, A., Uzzell, D., and Barnett, J., 2011. Making sense of unfamiliar risks in the countryside: the case of Lyme disease. Health & place, 17, 843–850. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, G., 2007. Commonplaces in risk talk: face threats and forms of interaction. Journal of risk research, 10 (3), 285–305. doi:10.1080/13669870601070536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, R.E., et al., 2001. Is there a consumer backlash against the diet and health message?. Journal of the American dietetic association, 101, 37–41. doi:10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00010-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cueto, F.J. and Verbeke, W., 2012. Consumer implications of the WCRF’s permanent update on colorectal cancer. Meat science, 90, 977–978. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, J., Horlick-Jones, T., and Murdock, G., 2001. Social amplification of risk: the media and the public. Sudbury: HSE Books.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., et al., 1992. The social amplification of risk: theoretical foundations and empirical applications. Journal of social issues, 48, 137–160. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01949.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J.E. and Stanyer, J., 2011. Reader opinion in the digital age: tabloid and broadsheet newspaper websites and the exercise of political voice. Journalism, 12 (8), 983–1003. doi:10.1177/1464884911415974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., Hawkes, G., and Houghton, J., 2008. Initial UK public reaction to avian influenza: analysis of opinions posted on the BBC website. Health, risk & society, 10 (4), 361–384. doi:10.1080/13698570802166456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secko, D.M., et al., 2011. The unfinished science story: journalist-audience interactions from the globe and mail’s online health and science sections. Journalism, 12 (7), 814–831. doi:10.1177/1464884911412704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D. 2012. What does a 13% increased risk of death mean? [online]. Available from: http://understandinguncertainty.org/comment/1430#comment-1430 [Accessed 6 September 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P. and Allum, N., 2004. Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public understanding of science, 13, 55–74. doi:10.1177/0963662504042690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L.M., and Kramer, B.S., 2009. Promoting healthy skepticism in the news: helping journalists get it right. Journal of the national cancer institute, 101 (23), 1596–1599. doi:10.1093/jnci/djp409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Xu, K., and Rodriguez, L., 2014. The rejection of science frames in the news coverage of the golden rice experiment in Hunan, China. Health, risk & society, 16 (4). doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.923092.
   Google Scholar