544
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Risk, pregnancy, childbirth and infants

‘I think it’s self-preservation’: risk perception and secrecy in early pregnancy

Pages 329-348 | Received 09 Dec 2014, Accepted 04 Sep 2015, Published online: 25 Sep 2015

References

  • Abel, E. K., & Browner, C. H. (1998). Selective compliance with biomedical authority and the uses of experiential knowledge. In M. Lock & P. A. Kaufert (Eds.), Pragmatic women and body politics (pp. 310–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Alaszewski, A. (2009). The future of risk in social science theory and research. Health, Risk & Society, 11(6), 487–492. doi:10.1080/13698570903329508
  • Armstrong, E. M. (2003). Conceiving risk, bearing responsibility: Fetal alcohol syndrome & the diagnosis of moral disorder. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Bailey, L. (1999). Refracted selves? A study of changes in self-identity in the transition to motherhood. Sociology, 33(2), 335–352. doi:10.1177/S0038038599000206
  • Barker, K. K. (1998). A ship upon a stormy sea: The medicalization of pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine, 47(8), 1067–1076. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00155-5
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.
  • Bolton, S. (2001). Changing faces: Nurses as emotional jugglers. Sociology of Health & Illness, 23(1), 85–100. doi:10.1111/shil.2001.23.issue-1
  • Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Browner, C. H., & Press, N. (1997). The production of authoritative knowledge in American prental care. In R. Davis-Floyd & C. Sargent (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: Cross cultural perspectives (pp. 113–131). London: University of California Press.
  • Carter, S. K. (2010). Beyond control: Body and self in women’s childbearing narratives. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(7), 993–1009. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01261.x
  • Carter, S. K., & Guittar, S. G. (2014). Emotion work among pregnant and birthing women. Midwifery, 30(9), 1021–1028. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2014.05.003
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
  • Coltman, M. (2013, April 29). Vodka, lies and soda: How to keep your early pregnancy a secret. Retrieved from http://talkmum.com/2013/10/how-to-keep-your-early-pregnancy-a-secret/
  • Copelton, D. A. (2007). “You are what you eat”: Nutritional norms, maternal deviance, and neutralization of women’s prenatal diets. Deviant Behavior, 28(5), 467–494. doi:10.1080/01639620701252571
  • Coxon, K. (2014). Risk in pregnancy and birth: Are we talking to ourselves? Health, Risk & Society, 16(6), 481–493. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.957262
  • Davis-Floyd, R., & Sargent, C. F. (1997). Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: Cross-cultural perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Draper, J. (2003). Blurring, moving and broken boundaries: Men’s encounters with the pregnant body. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(7), 743–767. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9566.2003.00368.x
  • Duden, B. (1992). Quick with child: An experience that has lost its status. Technology in Society, 14(3), 335–344. doi:10.1016/0160-791X(92)90011-X
  • Eliot, J. A., & Olver, I. N. (2007). Hope and hoping in the talk of dying cancer patients. Social Science & Medicine, 64(1), 138–149. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.029
  • Exley, C., & Letherby, G. (2001). Managing a disrupted lifecourse: Issues of identity and emotion work. Health, 5(1), 112–132.
  • Frost, J., Bradley, H., Levitas, R., Smith, L., & Garcia, J. (2007). The loss of possibility: Scientisation of death and the special case of early miscarriage. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(7), 1003–1022. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01019.x
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Gillespie, C. (2012). The experience of risk as ‘measured vulnerability’: Health screening and lay uses of numerical risk. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34(2), 194–207. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01381.x
  • Graham, H., & Oakley, A. (1981). Competing ideologies of reproduction: Medical and maternal perspectives on pregnancy. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Women, health and reproduction (pp. 50–74). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Green, J. (2009). Is it time for the sociology of health to abandon ‘risk’? Health, Risk & Society, 11(6), 493–508. doi:10.1080/13698570903329474
  • Han, S. (2009). Seeing like a family: Fetal ultrasound images and imaginings of kin. In V. R. Sasson & J. M. Law (Eds.), Imagining the fetus the unborn in myth, religion, and culture (pp. 275–290). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Han, S. (2013). Pregnancy in practice: Expectation and experience in the contemporary US. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575. doi:10.1086/ajs.1979.85.issue-3
  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ivry, T. (2010). Embodying culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Jones, D. S. (2007). ‘Fearing the worst, hoping for the best’: The discursive construction of risk in pregnancy. In J. S. Jones & J. Raisborough (Eds.), Risks, identities and the everyday (pp. 37–50). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Jurkovic, D., Overton, C., & Bender-Atik, R. (2013). Diagnosis and management of first trimester miscarriage. British Medical Journal, 346, f3676.
  • Keeley, B., Wright, L., & Condit, C. M. (2009). Functions of health fatalism: Fatalistic talk as face saving, uncertainty management, stress relief and sense making. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(5), 734–747. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01164.x
  • Layne, L. L. (2003). Motherhood lost: A feminist account of pregnancy loss in America. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lee, E. J., Macvarish, J., & Bristow, J. (2010). Risk, health and parenting culture. Health, Risk & Society, 12(4), 293–300. doi:10.1080/13698571003789732
  • Lupton, D. (1999). Risk and the ontology of pregnant embodiment. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (pp. 59–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lupton, D. (2012). ‘Precious cargo’: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health, 22(3), 329–340. doi:10.1080/09581596.2012.657612
  • Lupton, D. (2013). The social worlds of the unborn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lyerly, A. D., Mitchell, L. M., Armstrong, E. M., Harris, L. H., Kukla, R., Kuppermann, M., & Little, M. O. (2009). Risk and the pregnant body. Hastings Center Report, 39(6), 34–42. doi:10.1353/hcr.0.0211
  • Martin, E. (1989). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
  • Mauthner, N., & Doucet, A. (1998). Reflections on a voice-centred relational method: Analysing maternal and domestic voices. In J. Ribbens & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research (pp. 119–146). London: Sage.
  • Michels, T. C., & Tiu, A. Y. (2007). Second trimester pregnancy loss. American Family Physician, 76(9), 1341–1346.
  • Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1999). Maternal-fetal bonding, coping strategies, and mental health during pregnancy–the contribution of attachment style. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(3), 255–276. doi:10.1521/jscp.1999.18.3.255
  • Misri, S., & Kendrick, K. (2008). Perinatal depression, fetal bonding, and mother-child attachment: A review of the literature. Current Pediatric Reviews, 4(2), 66–70. doi:10.2174/157339608784462043
  • Mitchell, L. M. (2001). Baby’s first picture: Ultrasound and the politics of fetal subjects. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
  • Mitchell, M., & McClean, S. (2014). Pregnancy, risk perception and use of complementary and alternative medicine. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 101–116. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.867014
  • Morgan, L. M. (2011). Mediated bodies: Fetal bodies, undone. In F. E. Mascia-Lees (Ed.), A companion to the anthropology of the body and embodiment (pp. 320–336). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Nash, M. (2012a). Making ‘postmodern’ mothers: Pregnant embodiment, baby bumps and body image. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nash, M. (2012b). Weighty matters: Negotiating ‘fatness’ and ‘in-betweenness’ in early pregnancy. Feminism & Psychology, 22(3), 307–323. doi:10.1177/0959353512445361
  • NHS Choices. (2013, August 21). Miscarriage. Retrieved from http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/pages/miscarriage.aspx
  • NHS Health Scotland. (2012). Ready steady baby! Your complete guide to pregnancy, birth and parenthood. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland.
  • NHS Health Scotland. (2014, June 6). Your guide to screening tests during pregnancy. NHS Health Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.healthscotland.com/documents/3985.aspx
  • NHS Quality Improvement Scotland. (2009, November 3). Pathways for maternity care. Retrieved from http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/reproductive,_maternal_child/programme_resources/keeping_childbirth_natural.aspx
  • O’Malley, P. (2008). Governmentality and risk. In J. Zinn (Ed.), Social theories of risk and uncertainty: An introduction. (pp. 52–75). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Oakley, A. (1984). The captured womb: A history of the medical care of pregnant women. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Petersen, A., & Lupton, D. (1996). The new public health: Health and self in the age of risk. London: Sage.
  • Pickersgill, M., Martin, P., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2015). The changing brain: Neuroscience and the enduring import of everyday experience. Public Understanding of Science, 24(7), 878–892. doi:10.1177/0963662514521550
  • Press, N., & Browner, C. H. (1997). Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis. Social Science & Medicine, 45(7), 979–989. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00011-7
  • Rapp, R. (1998). Refusing prenatal diagnosis: The uneven meanings of bioscience in a multicultural world. In R. Davis-Floyd & J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborg babies: From techno-sex to techno-tots (pp. 143–167). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Reith, G. (2004). Uncertain times: The notion of ‘risk’ and the development of modernity. Time & Society, 13(2–3), 383–402. doi:10.1177/0961463X04045672
  • Roberts, J. (2012a). The visualised foetus: A cultural and political analysis of ultrasound imagery. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Roberts, J. (2012b). ‘Wakey wakey baby’: Narrating four dimensional (4D) bonding scans. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34(2), 299–314. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01345.x
  • Ross, E. (2012). Maternal-fetal attachment and engagement with antenatal advice. British Journal of Midwifery, 20(8), 566–575. doi:10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.566
  • Rothman, B. K. (1988). The tentative pregnancy: Prenatal diagnosis and the future of motherhood. London: Pandora.
  • Ruhl, L. (1999). Liberal governance and prenatal care: Risk and regulation in pregnancy. Economy and Society, 28(1), 95–117. doi:10.1080/03085149900000026
  • Scott, S., Prior, L., Wood, F., & Gray, J. (2005). Repositioning the patient: The implications of being ‘at risk’. Social Science & Medicine, 60(8), 1869–1879. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.020
  • Shakespeare, T. (1998). Choices and rights: Eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Disability & Society, 13(5), 665–681. doi:10.1080/09687599826452
  • Shildrick, M. (1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics. London: Routledge.
  • Taylor, J. S. (1998). Image of contradiction: Obstetrical ultrasound in American culture. In S. Franklin & H. Ragoné (Eds.), Reproducing reproduction: Kinship, power and technological innovation (pp. 15–45). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Taylor, J. S. (2008). The public life of the fetal sonogram: Technology, consumption, and the politics of reproduction. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Teman, E. (2010). Birthing a mother: The surrogate body and the pregnant self. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Turner, J. H. (2009). The sociology of emotions: Basic theoretical arguments. Emotion Review, 1(4), 340–354. doi:10.1177/1754073909338305
  • Upton, R. L., & Han, S. S. (2003). Maternity and its discontents: “Getting the body back” after pregnancy. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32(6), 670–692. doi:10.1177/0891241603257596
  • Warren, S., & Brewis, J. (2004). Matter over mind?: Examining the experience of pregnancy. Sociology, 38(2), 219–236. doi:10.1177/0038038504040860
  • Weitz, R. (1989). Uncertainty and the lives of persons with AIDS. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30(3), 270–281. doi:10.2307/2136960
  • Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2000). Thinking differently about thinking positive: A discursive approach to cancer patients’ talk. Social Science & Medicine, 50(6), 797–811. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00337-8
  • Williams, S. J., & Bendelow, G. (1998). Emotions in social life: Mapping the sociological terrain. In G. Bendelow & S. J. Williams (Eds.), Emotions in social life: Critical themes and contemporary issues (pp. xv–xxx). London: Routledge.
  • Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), 281–304. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004
  • Zinn, J. (2008). Introduction: The contribution of sociology to the discourse on risk and uncertainty. In J. Zinn (Ed.), Social theories of risk and uncertainty: An introduction (pp. 1–17). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Zinn, J. O. (2009). The sociology of risk and uncertainty: A response to Judith Green’s ‘Is it time for the sociology of health to abandon “risk”?’ Health, Risk & Society, 11(6), 509–526. doi:10.1080/13698570903329490

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.