‘In-between’ and other reasonable ways to deal with risk and uncertainty: A review article

References

• Alaszewski, A. (2015). Anthropology and risk: Insights into uncertainty, danger and blame from other cultures. Health, Risk & Society, 1(3–4), 205–225. doi:10.1080/13698575.2015.1070128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aven, T. (2014). Risk, surprises and black swans: Fundamental ideas and concepts in risk assessment and risk management. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009). On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research, 12(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/13669870802488883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Simon, J. (2002). Embracing risk: The changing culture of insurance and responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, A., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Suler, J. (2008). Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1867–1883. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastide, L. (2015). Faith and uncertainty: Migrants’ journeys between Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. Health, Risk & Society, 17(3–4), 226–245. doi:10.1080/13698575.2015.1071786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: AddisonWesley.
   Google Scholar
• Berning, M., & Hardon, A. (2016). Educated guesses and other ways to address the pharmacological uncertainty of designer drugs: An exploratory study of experimentation through an online drug forum. Contemporary Drug Problems, 43(3), 277–292. doi:10.1177/0091450916662164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloch, E. (1954). Das Prinzip Hoffnung. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, E. (1986). The principle of hope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonß, W., & Zinn, J. O. (2005). Erwartbarkeit, Glück und Vertrauen – Zum Wandel biographischer Sicherheitskonstruktionen in der Moderne. Soziale Welt, 56(2/3), 79–98. doi:10.5771/0038-6073-2005-2-3-183
   Google Scholar
• Borkman, T. (1976). Experiential knowledge: A new concept for the analysis of self-help groups. Social Service Review, 50(3), 445–456. doi:10.1086/643401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Éd. de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N. (2005). Shifting tenses. reconnecting regimes of truth and hope. Configurations, 13(3), 331–335. doi:10.1353/con.2007.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. (2015). Theorising uncertainty and risk across different modernities: Considering insights form ‘non-North-Western’ studies. Health, Risk & Society, 17(3–4), 185–195. doi:10.1080/13698575.2015.1077207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., De Graaf, S., Hillen, M., Smets, E., & Laarhoven, H. W. (2015). The interweaving of pharmaceutical and medical expectations as dynamics of micropharmaceuticalisation: Advancedstage cancer patients’ hope in medicines alongside trust in professionals. Social Science & Medicine, 131, 313321. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. (1987). The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. (2016). Young adults’ hopes for the long-term future: From re-enchantment with technology to faith in humanity. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(4), 517–532. doi:10.1080/13676261.2015.1083959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, N. S., Buchanan, H., & Aubeeluck, A. (2007). Social support in cyberspace: A content analysis of communication within a Huntington’s disease online support group. Patient Education and Counselling, 68, 173–178. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1996). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, S. (2016). The construction and use of hope within health-settings: Recent developments in qualitative research and ethnographic studies. Sociology Compass, 10/7, 603–612. doi:10.1111/soc4.12380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvecchio Good, M.-J. (2001). The biotechnical embrace. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 25, 395–410. doi:10.1023/A:1013097002487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, N. (2015). Engaging with risk in non-Western settings. Health, Risk & Society, 17(3–4), 196–204. doi:10.1080/13698575.2015.1086482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B. (2009). Smile or die: How positive thinking fooled america and the world. London: Granta.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1976). Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, B. (1779). Benjamin Franklin Letters. Passy April 8. Accessed 2 December 2016 [http://franklinpapers.org/franklin//framedVolumes.jsp?vol=29&page=283a].
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. (1968). The revolution of hope: Toward a humanized technology. New York, NY: American Mental Health Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (2003). The risk of risk. In R. Ericson & A. Doyle (Eds.), Risk and Morality (pp. 48–86). Toronto, Buffalo, London: Toronto University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehlen, A. (1980). Man in the age of technology. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehlen, A. (1988). Man, his nature and place in the world. New York: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (2001). Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In G. Gigerenzer & P. M. Todd (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 3–34). others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2009). Is it time for the sociology of health to abandon ‘risk’? Health, Risk & Society, 11(6), 493–508. doi:10.1080/13698570903329474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groß, M., & Hoffmann-Riem, H. (2005). Ecological restoration as a real-world experiment: Designing robust implementation strategies in an urban environment. Public Understanding of Science, 14, 269–284. doi:10.1177/0963662505050791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groß, M., Hoffmann-Riem, H., & Krohn, W. (2005). Realexperimente. Ökologische Gestaltungsprozesse in der Wissengesellschaft. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Harremoës, P. (2002). The precautionary principle in the 20th century: Late lessons from early warnings. London, Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Carretero, M., & Carling, J. (2012). Beyond “Kamikaze Migrants”: Risk-taking in West African boat migration to Europe. Human Organization, 71(4), 407–416. doi:10.17730/humo.71.4.n52709742v2637t1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Rothstein, H. (2001). Risk regulation under pressure: Problem solving or blame shifting? Administration and Society, 33, 21–53. doi:10.1177/00953990122019677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T. (2005). Informal logics of risk: Contingency and modes of practical reasoning. Journal of Risk Research, 8(3), 253272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., & Kitzinger, J. (2007). Bricollage in action: Learning about, making sense of, and discussing, issues about genetically modified crops and food. Health, Risk & Society, 9(1), 83103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, C. C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. A., & Webler, T. (2001). Risk, uncertainty, and rational action. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H. (2006). Social policy and risk. In G. Mythen & S. Walklate (eds.), Beyond the risk society. Critical reflections on risk and human security (pp. 60–76). Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. A. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. (2000). Risk culture. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond. critical issues for social theory (pp. 47–62). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. (2001). Non-linear individualization. In U. Beck & E. Beck-Gernsheim (eds.), Individualization (pp. vii–xii). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risks as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2013). Risk and emotion: Towards an alternative theoretical perspective. Health, Risk & Society, 15(8), 634–647. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.848847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyng, S. (ed.). (2005). Edgework: The sociology of risk taking. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 587–608. doi:10.2307/3003600
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly, C. (2006). Hoping, willing, and narrative reenvisioning. The Hedgehog Review, 8(3), 21–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattingly, C. (2010). Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience (Cambridge Studies in Medical Anthropology). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merkelsen, H. (2011). The constitutive element of probabilistic agency in risk: A semantic analysis of risk, danger, chance, and hazard. Journal of Risk Research, 14(7), 881–897. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.571781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A. (1996). Organisational responses to crisis. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (eds), Trust in organisations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J., & Stanworth, H. (2005). ‘Go for it!’ towards a critical realist approach to voluntary risk-taking. Health, Risk & Society, 77, 319–336. doi:10.1080/13698570500390853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrot, W. G. (ed.). (2001). Emotions in social psychology. Key readings in social psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peou, C., & Zinn, J. O. (2015). Cambodian youth managing expectations and uncertainties of the life course – a typology of biographical management. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(6), 726–742. doi:10.1080/13676261.2014.992328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. (2015). Hope in Health. The socio-politics of optimism. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Plutchik, R. (1991). The Emotions (revised edition). Lanham, New York, London: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Popay, J., & Williams, G. (1996). Public health research and lay knowledge. Social Science and Medicine, 42(5), 759768. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00341-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1996). Trust in numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything: rethinking the politics of uncertainty. London: DEMOS.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, A. (1995). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Towards a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (1992). Concepts of risk: A classification. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 53–79). Westport, Connecticut; London: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). The powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, S. (2015). The Paradoxes of Aid Work. Passionate professionals. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, A. M., Green, D., Moran, A., & Brett, J. (2009). Should the nurse change the light globe?: Human service professionals managing risk on the frontline. Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 361381. doi:10.1177/1440783309346478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M., & Stewart, M. (2014). Time, risk and midwife practice: The vaginal examination. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 84–100. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.874549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, H. (2000). The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice. Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (2010). The feeling of risk. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge: MA and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulloch, J., & Lupton, D. (2003). Risk and everyday life. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, D. (1997). The challenger launch decision. Technology, culture and deviance at NASA. London, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1930 [1905]). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London &. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1948). Science as a vocation. In H. M. C. W. Gerth (Ed.), Weber, Max: Essays in sociology (pp. 129–156). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. B. (1988). Searching for safety. New Brunswick, USA: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 281–304. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1996). the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert–lay knowledge divide. May S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (eds.), Risk, environment and modernity (pp. 44–83). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zigon, J. (2009). Hope dies last. two aspects of hope in contemporary Moscow. Anthropological Theory, 9(3), 253271. doi:10.1177/1463499609346986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2008). Heading into the unknown - everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty. Health, Risk & Society, 10(5), 439–450. doi:10.1080/13698570802380891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2010). Biography, risk and uncertainty—is there common ground for biographical research and risk research? [59 paragraphs]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(1).
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2012a). Soldiers, work and emotions – perspectives from the sociology of risk and uncertainty. In L. Cheshire et al. (Eds.), Emerging and enduring inequalities, (TASA 2012 Conference Proceedings). Canberra: The Australian Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2012b). More irresponsibility for everyone?! In G. Hage & R. Eckersley (eds.), Responsibility (pp. 29–42). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2015). Towards a better understanding of risk-taking: key concepts, dimensions and perspectives. Health, Risk & Society, 17(2), 99–114. doi:10.1080/13698575.2015.1023267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2018). Toma de Riesgos Conceptos Clave, Dimensiones y Perspectivas (unpublished manuscript). Mexico City, Mexico.
   Google Scholar