What disasters can reveal about techno-medical birth: Japanese women’s stories of childbirth during the 11 March, 2011 earthquake

References

• Alaszewski, A., & Brown, P. (2016). Time, risk and health. In J. M. Chamberlain (Ed.), Medicine, risk, discourse and power (pp. 60–83). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, B., & Beech, R. A. D. (Eds.). (2013). Dynamics of disaster: Lessons on risk, response and recovery.New York: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Asquith, P. J., & Kalland, A. (Eds.). (1997). Japanese images of nature: Cultural perspectives. New York: Routledge Curzon.
   Google Scholar
• Bankoff, G. (2003). Cultures of disaster: Society and natural hazard in the Philippines. New York: Routledge Curzon.
   Google Scholar
• Bankoff, G., & Frerks, G. (2013). Mapping vulnerability:” Disasters, development and people”. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ari, E. (1997). Body projects in japanese childcare: culture, organization and emotions in a preschool. London: Curzon..
   Google Scholar
• Bohren, M. A., Hofmeyr, G. J., Sakala, C., Fukuzawa, R. K., & Cuthbert, A. (2017). Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, G. (2016). Disaster culture: Knowledge and uncertainty in the wake of human and environmental catastrophe. Walnut Creek, CA : Left Coast Press..
   Google Scholar
• Clancey, G. (2006). Earthquake nation: The cultural politics of Japanese seismicity, 1868–1930. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coxon, K., Sandall, J., & Fulop, N. J. (2014). To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (2001). The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75(S1), 5–S23.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (2003b). Home-birth emergencies in the US and Mexico: The trouble with transport. Social Science & Medicine, 56(9), 1911–1931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (2017). Ways of knowing about birth: Mothers, midwives, medicine, and birth activism. Long Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. (2018). Epilogue: Inner space and outer space as cyberspace? Technocratizing womb and world. In R. Davis-Floyd (Ed.), Ways of knowing about birth: Mothers, midwives, medicine, and birth activism (pp. 397–411). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R. E. (2003a). Birth as an American rite of passage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doi, T. (1971). Amae no Kozo [Structure of Dependence]. Tokyo: Kobundo.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enarson, E., & Morrow, B. H. (eds). (1998). The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women’s eyes. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fortun, K. (2001). Advocacy after Bhopal: Environmentalism, disaster, new global orders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortun, K., & Frickel, S. (2012, March). Making a case for disaster science and technology studies. In STS forum on Fukushima (pp. 11–12). https://fukushimaforum.wordpress.com/online-forum-2/online-forum/making-a-case-for-disaster-science-and-technology-studies/
   Google Scholar
• Frickel, S., & Vincent, M. B. (2007). Hurricane Katrina, contamination, and the unintended organization of ignorance. Technology in Society, 29(2), 181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, T., Steger, B., & Slater, D. (eds.). (2013). Japan copes with calamity: Ethnographies of the Earthquake, Tsunami and Nuclear Diasters of March 11. Oxford, Berlin and New York: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Government statistics e-stat. (2016). Seifu toukei madoguchi. Retrieved from https://www.e-stat.go.jp/dbview?sid=0003214695
   Google Scholar
• Hindley, C., Hinsliff, S. W., & Thomson, A. M. (2006). English midwives’ views and experiences of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring in women at low obstetric risk: Conflicts and compromises. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 51(5), 354–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, S. M. (2005). Katrina and Rita: A disaster anthropologists’ thoughts. Anthropology News, 46, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Ivry, T. (2006). At the back stage of prenatal care: Japanese ob‐gyns negotiating prenatal diagnosis. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20(4), 441–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivry, T. (2010). Embodying culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivry, T. (2015). The pregnancy manifesto: Notes on how to extract reproduction from the petri dish. Medical Anthropology, 34(3), 274–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japanese Nursing Association. (2013). Bunben shisetsu ni okeru saigai hasseiji no taiou manyuaru sakusei gaido [A guide for the creation of a response manual in maternity facilities at times of disaster]. Osaka: Medica Shuppan.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (1997). Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In R. E. Davis-Floyd & C. F. Sargent (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 55–79). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• JSOG. (2017). Bunben ni kansuru chôsa [Research on birth, the Japanese association of obstetricians and gynaecologists]. Retrieved from http://www.jaog.or.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/20171213_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kimura, A. H. (2016). Radiation brain moms and citizen scientists: The gender politics of food contamination after Fukushima. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A., Lewis, L., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Styles, C. (2013). Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164173/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, E. (1991). Shussan no bunka jinruigaku [Anthropology of childbirth]. Tokyo: Kaimeisha.
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, C. (Ed.). (2009). Childbirth, midwifery and concepts of time (Vol. 17). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Morioka, R. (2013). Mother courage: Women as activists between a passive populace and a paralyzed government. In T. Gill, B. Steger, & D. H. Slater (Eds.), Japan copes with calamity: Ethnographies of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disasters of March 2011 (pp. 177–200). Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Namikawa, S., & Kobayashi, K. (2012). Happy birthday 3.11: Ano hi shinsaichi de umareta kodomotachi to kazoku no monogatari [Happy Birthday 3.11: The stories of the children who were born on that day and their families]. Tokyo: Asukashinsa.
   Google Scholar
• NHK. (2012). Ano hi umareta inochi (110 nin ijō) [The lives born on that day (more than 110)]. Retrieved from http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1h7zk2
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1980). Women confined: Towards a sociology of childbirth. New York: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver-Smith, A., & Hoffman, S. (eds). (1999). Anthropology and the angry earth. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pascali‐Bonaro, D., & Kroeger, M. (2004). Continuous female companionship during childbirth: A crucial resource in times of stress or calm. The Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 49(4), 19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petryna, A. (2002). Life exposed: Biological citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rattray, J., Flowers, K., Miles, S., & Clarke, J. (2011). Foetal monitoring: A woman-centred decision-making pathway. Women and Birth, 24(2), 65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, B. K. (2014). Pregnancy, birth and risk: An introduction. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, B. K. (2016). A bun in the oven: How the food and birth movements resist industrialization. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scamell, M., & Alaszewski, A. (2012). Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: Midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health, Risk & Society, 14(2), 207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scamell, M., & Stewart, M. (2014). Time, risk and midwife practice: The vaginal examination. Health, Risk & Society, 16(1), 84–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiono, E., & Kikuchi, S. (2016). The experiences of health care professionals who assisted out-of-hospital delivery immediately after the Great Japan Earthquake. Journal of Japan Academy of Midwifery, 30(1), 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. H., Morioka, R., & Danzuka, H. (2014). Micro-politics of radiation: young mothers looking for a voice in post–3.11 fukushima. Critical Asian Studies, 46(3), 485–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takehara, K., Noguchi, M., Shimane, T., & Chi, M. (2008). Josanjo to sannin ni okeru shussan taiken nikann suru ryoteki knekyu’ [A quantitative study on childbirth experiences of women who delivered at four birthing homes and one maternity hospital]. Japanese Journal of Maternal Health, 49(2), 275–285.
   Google Scholar
• Tsipy, I. (2007). Embodied responsibilities: pregnancy in the eyes of japanese ob‐gyns. Sociology Of Health & Illness, 29(2), 251–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, K.E., & Matsuoka E. (2019). Comparing childbirth in brazil and japan: social hierarchies, cultural values, and the meaning of place. In R. Davis-Floyd and M. Cheyney (Ed.), Birth in Eight Cultures:Brazil, Greece, Japan, Mexico,The Netherlands, New Zealand, Tanzania, United States (pp. 89–128). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press
   Google Scholar
• Woods, A. (2011). The limits of narrative: Provocations for the medical humanities. Medical Humanities, 37(2), 73–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasui, M. (2013). Shussan kankyō no minzokugaku: “Dai san ji osan kakumei” ni mukete [Folklore of the childbearing environment: Towards “the third childbirth revolution”]. Kyoto: Shōwadō.
   Google Scholar