222
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Understandings of risk amid wider discursive regimes

‘It’s not disrespect – it’s putting you at risk’: when right meets risk in the field of cycling research & policy

&
Pages 199-215 | Received 06 Jan 2022, Accepted 16 Oct 2022, Published online: 20 Oct 2022

References

  • Aldred, R. (2012). Governing transport from welfare state to hollow state: The case of cycling in the UK. Transport Policy, 23(September), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.012
  • Aldred, R. (2013). Incompetent or too competent? Negotiating everyday cycling identities in a motor dominated society. Mobilities, 8(2), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.696342
  • Aldred, R. (2016). Cycling near misses: Their frequency, impact, and prevention. Transportation Research Part A, 90, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.016
  • Aldred, R., & Crosweller, S. (2015). Investigating the rates and impacts of near misses and related incidents among UK cyclists. Journal of Transport & Health, 2(3), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.05.006
  • Aldred, R., & Goodman, A. (2018). Predictors of the frequency and subjective experience of cycling near misses: Findings from the first two years of the UK Near Miss Project. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 110, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.015
  • Balkmar, D. (2018). Violent mobilities: Men, masculinities and road conflicts in Sweden. Mobilities, 13(5), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2018.1500096
  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity.
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. SAGE.
  • Bonham, J. (2006). Transport: Disciplining the body that travels. The Sociological Review, 54(1_suppl), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00637
  • Bonham, J., & Cox, P. (2010). The disruptive traveller? A Foucauldian analysis of cycleways. Road & Transport Research, 19(2), 42–53. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.406591047439203
  • Bösehans, G., & Massola, G. M. (2018). Commuter cyclists’ risk perceptions and behaviour in the city of São Paulo. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.029
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  • Chataway, E. S., Kaplan, S., Nielsen, T. A. S., & Prato, C. G. (2014). Safety perceptions and reported behavior related to cycling in mixed traffic: A comparison between Brisbane and Copenhagen. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 23, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.021
  • Cox, P. (2022). Vélomobility is to degrowth as automobility is to growth: Prefigurative cycling imaginaries. Applied Mobilities, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2022.2087134
  • Delbosc, A., Naznin, F., Haslam, N., & Haworth, N. (2019). Dehumanization of cyclists predicts self-reported aggressive behaviour toward them: A pilot study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.005
  • Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage. (2019). Design manual for urban roads and streets. https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/c808c-design-manual-for-urban-roads-and-streets-2019-low-res/
  • Douglas, M. (2003). Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. Routledge.
  • Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. University of California Press.
  • Egan, R. (2019). Precarious entitlement to public space and utility cycling in Dublin: A grounded theory study [ PhD Thesis]. Dublin City University.
  • Egan, R. (2021). ‘Provoking responsibility’: The struggle for recognition as an everyday cyclist in Dublin City. Geoforum, 127(December), 23–32. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.09.012
  • Egan, R. (2022). Sacrificing entitlement for self-Preservation: ‘Privatising vulnerability’ as a cyclist in Dublin. Mobilities, 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1985379
  • Egan, R., & Philbin, M. (2021). Precarious entitlement to public space & utility cycling in Dublin. Mobilities, 16(4), 509–523. doi:10.1080/17450101.2021.1913067.
  • Foucault, M. (1991). Chapter 4: governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.
  • Fraser, N. (2002). Recognition without ethics? In S. Lash & M. Featherstone (Eds.), Recognition and difference: politics, identity, multiculture (pp. 21–42). SAGE Publications.
  • Freudendal‐Pedersen, M. (2015). Cyclists as part of the city’s organism: structural stories on cycling in Copenhagen. City & Society, 27(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12051
  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: issues and discussions. Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.
  • Green, J. (2009). Is it time for the sociology of health to abandon ‘risk’? Health, Risk & Society, 11(6), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570903329474
  • Heesch, K. C., Sahlqvist, S., & Garrard, J. (2011). Cyclists’ experiences of harassment from motorists: Findings from a survey of cyclists in Queensland, Australia. Preventive Medicine, 53(6), 417–420. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.09.015.
  • Heesch, K. C., Schramm, A., Debnath, A. K., & Haworth, N. (2017). Cyclists’ perceptions of motorist harassment pre- to post-trial of the minimum passing distance road rule amendment in Queensland, Australia. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 28(3), 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE16119
  • Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.
  • International Transport Forum. (2013). Cycling, health and safety. OECD. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/transport/cycling-health-and-safety_9789282105955-en
  • Joshi, M. S., Senior, V., & Smith, G. P. (2001). A diary study of the risk perceptions of road users. Health, Risk & Society, 3(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570120079877
  • Kummeneje, A.-M., & Rundmo, T. (2020). Attitudes, risk perception and risk-taking behaviour among regular cyclists in Norway. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 69, 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.007
  • Lawson, A. R., Pakrashi, V., Ghosh, B., & Szeto, W. Y. (2013). Perception of safety of cyclists in Dublin City. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.029
  • Longhurst, J. (2015). Bike battles: A history of sharing the American Road. University of Washington Press.
  • Lugo, A. (2018). Bicycle/race: transportation, culture, and resistance. Microcosm Publishing.
  • Lupton, D. (1999). Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
  • Manton, R., Rau, H., Fahy, F., Sheahan, J., & Clifford, E. (2016). Using mental mapping to unpack perceived cycling risk. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 88, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.017
  • Marín Puchades, V., Fassina, F., Fraboni, F., De Angelis, M., Prati, G., de Waard, D., & Pietrantoni, L. (2018). The role of perceived competence and risk perception in cycling near misses. Safety Science, 105, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.013
  • McCarthy, D. (2011). ‘I’m a normal person’1: an examination of how utilitarian cyclists in Charleston South Carolina use an insider/outsider framework to make sense of risks. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1439–1455. doi:10.1177/0042098010375322.
  • Ng, A., Debnath, A. K., & Heesch, K. C. (2017). Cyclist’ safety perceptions of cycling infrastructure at un-signalised intersections: Cross-sectional survey of Queensland cyclists. Journal of Transport & Health, 6, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.03.001
  • Nixon, D. V. (2014). Speeding capsules of alienation? Social (dis)connections amongst drivers, cyclists and pedestrians in Vancouver, BC. Geoforum, 54(July), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.04.002
  • Oldmeadow, J. A., Povey, S., Povey, A., & Critchley, C. (2019). Driver anger towards cyclists in Australia: Investigating the role of the perceived legitimacy of cyclists as road users. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 63, 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.021
  • Packer, J. (2003). Chapter 6: disciplining mobility - governing and safety. In J. Z. Bratich, J. Packer, & M. C. Albany (Eds.), Foucault, cultural studies, and governmentality (pp. 135–162). State University of New York Press.
  • Parkin, J., Wardman, M., & Page, M. (2007). Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(2), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.007
  • Poulos, R. G., Hatfield, J., Rissel, C., Flack, L. K., Grzebieta, R., & McIntosh, A. S. (2019). Cyclists’ self-reported experiences of, and attributions about, perceived aggressive behaviour while sharing roads and paths in New South Wales, Australia. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.027
  • Poulos, R. G., Hatfield, J., Rissel, C., Flack, L. K., Shaw, L., Grzebieta, R., & McIntosh, A. S. (2017). Near miss experiences of transport and recreational cyclists in New South Wales, Australia. Findings from a prospective cohort study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 101, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.020
  • Road Safety Authority. (2020). Rules of the Road (). https://www.rsa.ie/docs/default-source/services/s1.8-learner-driver-resources/rules-of-the-road-2020.pdf?sfvrsn=6d948b39_2
  • Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  • Sanders, R. L. (2015). Perceived traffic risk for cyclists: The impact of near miss and collision experiences. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 75, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.004
  • Scott, N. A. (2016). Cycling, performance and the common good: copenhagenizing Canada’s Capital. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 25(1), 22–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26195304
  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
  • Smarter Travel. (2009). National Cycle Policy Framework. Department of Transport. https://www.hse.ie/eng/about/who/healthwellbeing/our-priority-programmes/heal/healpublications/national-cycle-policy-framework.pdf
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (1st ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Taylor-Gooby, P., & Zinn, J. O. (2006). Current directions in risk research: New developments in psychology and sociology. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 26(2), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00746.x
  • Wilkinson, I. (2001). Social theories of risk perception: At once indispensable and insufficient. Current Sociology, 49(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392101049001002
  • Winters, M., Babul, S., Becker, H. J. E. H., Brubacher, J. R., Chipman, M., Cripton, P., Cusimano, M. D., Friedman, S. M., Harris, M. A., Hunte, G., Monro, M., Reynolds, C. C. O., Shen, H., & Teschke, K. (2012). Safe cycling: how do risk perceptions compare with observed risk? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 103(S3), S42–S47. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03403834
  • Zinn, J. O. (2009). The sociology of risk and uncertainty: A response to Judith Green’s ‘Is it time for the sociology of health to abandon “risk”? Health, Risk & Society, 11(6), 509–526. doi:10.1080/13698570903329490.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.