1,456
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Sense-making and everyday practices amid pandemic risk

Reassessing social trust: gossip, self-policing, and Covid-19 risk communication in Norway

, &
Pages 180-198 | Received 15 May 2022, Accepted 11 Apr 2023, Published online: 13 Apr 2023

References

  • Abram, S. (2012). “The Normal Cabin’s Revenge”. Home Cultures, 9(3), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174212X13414983522071
  • Alaszewski, A. (2021). Plus ça change? The COVID-19 pandemic as continuity and change as reflected through risk theory. Health, Risk & Society, 23(7–8), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2021.2016656
  • Andreasson, U. (2017). Trust – the Nordic Gold. Nordic Council of Ministers. Report No. ANP 2017:737. https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1095959/FULLTEXT02.pdf
  • Balog-Way, D., McComas, K., & Besley, J. (2020). The evolving field of risk communication. Risk Analysis, 40(S1), 2240–2262. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13615
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage Publications.
  • Benjamin, R. (2016). Informed Refusal: Toward a justice based bioethics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(6), 967–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916656059
  • Besnier, N. (2019). Gossip in Ethnographic Perspective. In F. Giardini & R. Wittek Eds., The oxford handbook of gossip and Reputation, Oxford handbooks (online edn. Oxford Academic. 13 June 2019)(accessed 18 Mar. 2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190494087.013.6
  • Bø, G. (2006). Å dikte Norge: Dikterne om det norske [To compose Norway: The poems about the Norwegian]. Bergen University Press.
  • Bouder, F., Way, D., Löfstedt, R., & Evensen, D. (2015). Transparency in Europe: A quantitative study. Risk Analysis, 35(7), 1210–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12386
  • Bourrier, M., Deml, M., & Mahdavian, F. (2022). Comparative report of the COVID-19 pandemic responses in Norway. UiS Scholarly Publishing Services. https://doi.org/10.31265/USPS.254
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical Guide. Sage Publishing.
  • Celermajer, D., & Nassar, D. (2020). COVID and the era of emergencies: What type of freedom is at stake? Democratic Theory, 7(2), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2020.070203
  • Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci022
  • Douglas, M. (1996). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. Routledge. 1992.
  • Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1951). Social anthropology. Cohen & West.
  • Evensen, D., Warren, G., & Bouder, F. (2023). Satisfaction with governmental risk communication both increases and decreases COVID-19 mitigation behaviours. International Journal of Public Health, 68, 1604966. article no. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2023.1604966
  • Fersch, B., Schneider-Kamp, A., & Breidahl, K. N. (2022). Anxiety and trust in times of health crisis: How parents navigated health risks during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark. Health, Risk & Society, 24(1–2), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2022.2028743
  • Fischhoff, B. (2020, Aug 1). the importance of testing messages. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98(8), 516–517. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.030820. PMID: 32773896; PMCID: PMC7411322 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411322/
  • Fjaeran, L., & Aven, T. (2021). Creating conditions for critical trust – How an uncertainty-based risk perspective relates to dimensions and types of trust. Safety Science, 133, 105008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105008
  • Freitag, M., & Traunmüller, R. (2009). Spheres of trust: An empirical analysis of the foundations of particularised and generalised trust. European Journal of Political Research, 48(6), 782–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00849.x
  • Geertz, C. (1988). Works and Lives. Stanford University Press.
  • Gluckman, M. (1963). Papers in honor of Melville J. Herskovits: Gossip and scandal. Current Anthropology, 4(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1086/200378
  • Gullestad, M. (2002). Invisible fences: Egalitarianism, nationalism and racism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00098
  • Helsingen, L. M., Refsum, E., Gjøstein, D. K., Løberg, M., Bretthauer, M., Kalager, M., & Emilsson, L. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway and Sweden–threats, trust, and impact on daily life: A comparative survey. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09615-3
  • Löfstedt, R. E. (2005). Risk management in post-trust societies. Earthscan, 2005, 2009. Paperback edition
  • Marcus, G. E. (1986). Contemporary problems of ethnography in the modern world system. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture (pp. 165–193). University of California Press.
  • Möllering, G. (2005). The trust/control duality: An integrative perspective on positive expectations of others. International Sociology, 20(3), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580905055478
  • Moss, S. M., & Sandbakken, E. M. (2021). “Everybody needs to do their part, so we can get this under control.” Reactions to the Norwegian government meta‐narratives on COVID‐19 measures. Political Psychology, 42(5), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12727
  • Norges Offentlige Utredninger (NOU). (2021). Myndighetenes håndtering av koronapandemien: Rapport fra Koronakommisjonen [Authorities’ handling of the corona pandemic: Report from the Corona Commission], Volume 6. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/det-norske-lokaldemokratiets-legitimitet/id2741396
  • Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23(5), 961–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00373
  • Renn, O., & Levine, D. (1991). Credibility and trust in risk communication. In R. E. Kasperson & P. J. M. Stallen (Eds.), Communicating Risks to the Public. Technology, Risk, and Society (An International Series in Risk Analysis). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10.
  • Roeser, S. (2012). Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: A role for emotions. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01812.x
  • Sætrevik, B., Bærøe, K., Carlsen, B., & Bjørkheim, S. B. (2021). Nordmenn stolte på myndighetenes informasjon og tiltak i starten av koronapandemien [Norwegians relied on the authorities’ information and measures at the start of the corona pandemic]. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, 24(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2021-02-06
  • Sahlins, M. (2011). What Kinship is (Part One). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01666.x
  • Segaard, S. B. (2020). Det norske lokaldemokratiets legitimitet. Tillit, deltakelse og ulikhet [The legitimacy of Norwegian local democracy. Trust, participation and inequality]. Rapport–Institutt for samfunnsforskning. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/det-norske-lokaldemokratiets-legitimitet/id2741396/.
  • Shapiro, M., & Bird David, N. (2017). Routinergency: Domestic securitization in Contemporary Israel. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(4), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816677550
  • Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.203034
  • Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13(6), 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x
  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 24(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
  • Smith, C. (2005). Understanding trust and confidence: Two paradigms and their significance for health and social care. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00312.x
  • Solberg, E. (2020). Erna Solbergs tale til folket [Erna Solberg’s speech to the people] Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK). Retrieved October, 2021. Available online: https://www.nrk.no/video/erna-solbergs-tale-til-folket_34d1bb36-143c-4564-89d7-f68eff788540.
  • Svendsen, G. L. H., & Svendsen, G. T. (2016). Trust, social capital and the Scandinavian welfare state: Explaining the flight of the bumblebee. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Tvedt, T. (2009 [2003]). Utviklingshjelp, utenrikspolitikk og makt : den norske modellen Utviklingshjelp, utenrikspolitikk og makt : den norske modellen. [Development aid, foreign policy and power: the Norwegian model]. (2nd. Edition). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • Tvedt, T. (2016). Derfor truer godhetstyranniet demokratiet selv [Therefore, the tyranny of goodness threatens democracy itself]. Aftenposten, 11(03). https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kronikk/i/7l5XB/derfor-truert
  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. SSRN Electronic Journal, Available at. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.824504
  • Witoszek, N. (2011). The origins of the «Regime of goodness»: Remapping the cultural history of Norway. Universitetetforlaget.
  • World Health Organization. (2020). Norway: WHO Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/region/euro/country/no