A brief Spanish–English equivalent version of the Boston Naming Test: A Project FRONTIER Study

REFERENCES

• Ardila, A. (2007). Toward the development of a cross-linguistic naming test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 297–307. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Calero, M. D., Arnedo, M. L., Navarro, E., Ruiz-Pedrosa, M., & Carnero, C. (2002). Usefulness of a 15-item version of the Boston Naming Test in neuropsychological assessment of low-educational elders with dementia. The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57, 187–191. doi:10.1093/geronb/57.2.P187
   Google Scholar
• de la Plata, C. M., Arango-Lasprilla, J. C., Alegret, M., Moreno, A., Tarraga, L., Lara, M., … Cullum, C. M. (2009). Item analysis of three Spanish naming tests: A cross-cultural investigation. NeuroRehabilitation, 24, 75–85. doi:10.3233/NRE-2009-0456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item level response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl. 1), 5–18. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, L. A., & Donovan, N. J. (2012). Item-level psychometrics and predictors of performance for Spanish/English bilingual speakers on an Object and Action Naming Battery. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 359–381. doi:10.1044/1092=4388(2011/10-0307)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, L. A., & Kiran, S. (2004). Confrontation naming and semantic relatedness judgments in Spanish/English bilinguals. Aphasiology, 18, 567–579. doi:10.1080/02687030444000057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fastenau, P. S., Denburg, N. L., & Mauer, B. A. (1998). Parallel short forms of the Boston Naming Test: Psychometric properties and norms for older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 828–834. doi:10.1076/jcen.20.6.828.1105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6, 304–312. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.304
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, R. E., Bezeau, S. C., Fogarty, J., & Blair, R. (2004). Boston Naming Test short forms: A comparison of previous forms with new item response theory based forms. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 891–902. doi:10.1080/13803390490510716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, G. (2002). The empirical development of a neuropsychological screening instrument for Mexican-Americans. In F. R. Ferraro (Ed.), Minority and cross-cultural aspects of neuropsychological assessment: Studies on neuropsychology, development, and cognition (pp. 205–224). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, V. L., Hall, J. R., Harvey, M., Cullum, C. M., Lacritz, L., Massman, P. J., … O’Bryant, S. E. (2011). An examination of the Boston Naming Test: Calculation of “estimated” 60-item score from 30- and 15-item scores in a cognitively impaired population. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26, 351–355. doi:10.1002/gps.2533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, P. S., & Luszcz, M. A. (2002). A review of the Boston Naming Test and multiple-occasion normative data for older adults on 15-item versions. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 555–574. doi:10.1076/clin.16.4.555.13916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnert, K. J., Hernandez, A. E., & Bates, E. (1998). Bilingual performance on the Boston Naming Test: Preliminary norms in Spanish and English. Brain and Language, 65, 422–440. doi:10.1006/brln.1998.2001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein, D. A., Rubert, M. P., Arguelles, T., & Duara, R. (1995). Neuropsychological test performance and prediction of functional capacities among Spanish-speaking and English-speaking patients with dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 75–88. doi:10.1016/0887-6177(93)E0005-V
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrushina, M. N., Boone, K. B., & D’Elia, L. F. (1999). Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Bryant, S. E., Edwards, M., Menon, C. V., Gong, G., & Barber, R. C. (2011). Long-term low-level arsenic exposure is associated with poorer neuropsychological functioning: A Project FRONTIER study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8, 861–874. doi:10.3390/ijerph8030861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedraza, O., Graff-Radford, N. R., Smith, G. E., Ivnik, R. J., Willis, F. B., Petersen, R. C., & Lucas, J. A. (2009). Differential item functioning of the Boston Naming Test in cognitively normal African American and Caucasian older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 758. doi:10.1017/S1355617709990361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puente, A. E., & Ardila, A. (2000). Neuropsychological assessment of Hispanics. In E. Fletcher-Janzen, T. L. Strickland, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural neuropsychology (pp. 87–104). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Puente, A. E., & Puente, A. N. (2009). The challenge of measuring abilities and competencies in Hispanics/Latinos. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (pp. 417–442). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D. (2001). IRTLRDIF v.2.0b: Software for the computation of the statistics involved in item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item functioning. Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/~dthissen/dl.html
   Google Scholar
• Velozo, C. A., Lai, J. S., Mallinson, T., & Hauselman, E. (2001). Maintaining instrument quality while reducing items: Application of Rasch analysis to a self-report of visual function. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 4, 667–680. Retrieved from http://www.jampress.org/JOM.htm
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F. M., Heslin, K. C., Mehta, K. M., Yang, C. W., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Kleinman, M., … Teresi, J. A. (2011). A comparison of item response theory-based methods for examining differential item functioning in object naming test by language of assessment among older Latinos. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53, 440–460. Retrieved from http://www.psychologie-aktuell.com/index.php?id=200
   Google Scholar