Stroop interference associated with efficient reading fluency and prelexical orthographic processing

References

• Augustinova, M., & Ferrand, L. (2014). Automaticity of word reading: Evidence from the semantic Stroop paradigm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 343–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besner, D. (2001). The myth of ballistic processing: Evidence from Stroop’s paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 324–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., & Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(2), 221–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., Joneleit, K., Robinson, C. S., & Brown, C. R. (2002). Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: Testing the limits of involuntary word processing. The American Journal of Psychology, 115(4), 515–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, J. S. (2002). Why do non-color words interfere with color naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, S., Chee, E., Chase, G., Baumgardner, T., Schuerholz, L., Reader, M., … Denckla, M. B. (1997). Reading proficiency affects the construct validity of the stroop test interference score. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11(2), 105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing, 14(5–6), 549–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). The distractor frequency effect in picture–word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everatt, J., Warner, J., Miles, T., & Thomson, M. (1997). The incidence of Stroop interference in dyslexia. Dyslexia, 3(4), 222–228.
   Google Scholar
• Faccioli, C., Peru, A., Rubini, E., & Tassinari, G. (2008). Poor readers but compelled to read: Stroop effects in developmental dyslexia. Child Neuropsychology, 14, 277–283. doi:10.1080/09297040701290040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floden, D., Vallesi, A., & Stuss, D. T. (2011). Task context and frontal lobe activation in the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(4), 867–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, C. J., & Freshwater, S. M. (2002). A manual for the Stroop Color and Word Test–Adult Version. Chicago, IL: Stoelting Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, C., & Jackson, P. (1981). A study of the relationship between the Stroop effect and reading age in dyslexic subjects. Journal of Research in Reading, 4(1), 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13(2), 123–146.
   Google Scholar
• Mano, Q. R., & Osmon, D. C. (2008). Visuoperceptual-orthographic reading abilities: A confirmatory factor analysis study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(4), 421–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medler, D. A., & Binder, J. R. (2005). MCWord: An on-line orthographic database of the English language. Retrieved from http://www.neuro.mcw.edu/mcword/
   Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S., Taylor, T. J., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory & Cognition, 29(1), 137–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, R., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(6), 339–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., Archonti, A., & Skaloumbakas, C. (2007). Reading ability is negatively related to Stroop interference. Cognitive Psychology, 54(3), 251–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., Vlahou, E. L., Moirou, D., & Ziaka, L. (2014). Word reading practice reduces Stroop interference in children. Acta Psychologica, 148, 204–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1987). The impact of automaticity theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(3), 167–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
   Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery—Third Edition. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar