Methods for validating chronometry of computerized tests

References

• Aslaksen, P. M., Orbo, M., Evestad, R., Scheafer, C., & Anke, A. (2013). Prediction of on-road driving ability after traumatic brain injury and stroke. European Journal of Neurology, 20, 1227–1233. doi:10.1111/ene.12172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botella, A., & Ehreth, H. (2012). Apple iMac 21.5-inch (2012): Screen test results. DIGITALVERSUS. Retrieved from http://www.digitalversus.com/desktop/apple-imac-21–5-inch-2012-p14973/apple-imac-21-5-inch-2012-screen-test-results-n27409.html
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J., Vosburg, S. K., Evans, S. M., & Levin, F. R. (2006). Assessment of cognitive functioning of methadone-maintenance patients. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 25, 15–25. doi:10.1300/J069v25n04_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central limit theorem. (2008). In International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Retrieved from http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3045300301.html
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, T. J., Higham, S., Mayes, J., Dale, M., Shaunak, S., & Lekwuwa, G. (2013). The role of working memory and attentional disengagement on inhibitory control: Effects of aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Age, 35, 1637–1650. doi:10.1007/s11357-012-9466-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F. (2010). Does variability in human performance outweigh imprecision in response devices such as computer keyboards? Behavior Research Methods, 42, 205–211. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deouell, L. Y., Sacher, Y., & Soroker, N. (2005). Assessment of spatial attention after brain damage with a dynamic reaction time test. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 697–707. doi:10.1017/S1355617705050824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, M. (2013). Do Apple Macs need antivirus? OS X security explained. Retrieved from http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/feature/security/do-apple-macs-need-antivirus-os-x-security-explained-3418367/
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskes, G., Jones, S. A. H., Butler, B., & Klein, R. (2013, November). Measuring the brain networks of attention in the young healthy adult population. Paper presented at Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganssle, J. (2008). A guide to debouncing. Retrieved from http://www.ganssle.com/debouncing.htm
   Google Scholar
• Garaizar, P., Vadillo, M. A., Lopez-de-Ipina, D., & Matute, H. (2014). Measuring software timing errors in the presentation of visual stimuli in cognitive neuroscience experiments. PLOS One, 9, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. A. H., Butler, B., Kintzel, F., Salmon, J. P., Klein, R. M., & Eskes, G. A. (2015). Measuring the components of attention using the Dalhousie computerized attention battery (DalCAB). Psychological Assessments, 27(4), 1286–1300. doi:10.1037/pas0000148
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. A. H., Butler, B. C., Kintzel, F., Johnson, A., Klein, R. M., & Eskes, G. A. (2016). Measuring the performance of attention networks with the Dalhousie Computerized Attention Battery (DalCAB): Methodology and reliability in healthy adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 823. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingstone, A., Klein, R. M., Morein-Zamir, S., Hunt, A., Fisk, J., & Maxner, C. (2002). Orienting attention in aging and Parkinson’s disease: Distinguishing modes of control. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 951–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuphaldt, T. R. (2007). Lessons in electronic circuits. Volume IV: Digital. Retrieved from http://www.ibiblio.org/kuphaldt/electricCircuits/Digital/DIGI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, D., Reeves, D., Watson, J., & Harrison, M. (2005). Automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM) measures of cognitive effects of Alzheimer’s disease. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 403–408. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2004.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnes, W. J., & Taylor, T. L. (2001). Millisecond timing on PCs and Macs. Behavior, Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 33, 174–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLeod, J. W., Lawrence, M. A., McConnell, M. M., Eskes, G. A., Klein, R. M., & Shore, D. I. (2010). Appraising the ANT: Psychometric and theoretical considerations of the attention network test. Neuropsychology, 24, 637–651. doi:10.1037/a001980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masicampo, E. J., & Lalande, D. R. (2012). A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2271–2279. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.711335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, R. R. (2015). A reminder on millisecond timing accuracy and potential replication failure in computer-based psychology experiments: An open letter. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 408–411. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0577-0
   Google Scholar
• Plant, R. R., & Hammond, N. V. (2002). Towards an experimental timing standards lab: Benchmarking precision in the real world. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 218–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., & Turner, G. (2004). Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: How and why? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 291–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., & Whitehouse, T. (2003). How choice of mouse may affect response timing in psychological studies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(2), 276–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plant, R. R., & Quinlan, P. T. (2013). Could millisecond timing errors in commonly used equipment be a cause of replication failure in some neuroscience studies? Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 598–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, J. P., Matheson, H. E., & McMullen, P. A. (2014). Slow categorization but fast naming for photographs of manipulable objects. Visual Cognition, 22(2), 141–172. doi:10.1080/13506285.2014.887042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schendel, K. L., & Robertson, L. C. (2002). Using reaction time to assess patients with unilateral neglect and extinction. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 941–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S–R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Shallice, T., Picton, T. W., Binns, M. A., Macdonald, R.,… Katz, D. I. (2005). Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed. Neuropsychologia, 43, 396–417. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tscherwitschke, O. (1999). Mouse Rate Checker 1.1b. A simple Windows program for testing mouse polling rates [Freeware]. Retrieved from http://tscherwitschke.de/old/download.html
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R., & Giray, M. (1989). The resolution of clocks: Effects on reaction time measurement—Good news for bad clocks. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1989.tb01111.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.-R., Chen, Y.-C., Lee, C.-S., Cheng, S.-J., & Wang, R.-Y. (2007). Dual-task-related gait changes in individuals with stroke. Gait & Posture, 25, 185–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar