437
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Decision support in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 484-496 | Received 14 Jun 2018, Accepted 13 Feb 2019, Published online: 05 Mar 2019

References

  • Aarts, S., van den Akker, M., & Winkens, B. (2014). The importance of effect sizes. The European Journal of General Practice, 20(1), 61–64.
  • Anderson, S. W., & Tranel, D. (2002). Neuropsychological consequences of dysfunction in human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 7, pp. 145–156). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Bäckman, L., Small, B. J., & Fratiglioni, L. (2001). Stability of the preclinical episodic memory deficit in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 124(1), 96–102.
  • Baudic, S., Dalla Barba, G., Thibaudet, M. C., Smagghe, A., Remy, P., & Traykov, L. (2006). Executive function deficits in early Alzheimer’s disease and their relations with episodic memory. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(1), 15–21.
  • Bechara, A., & Martin, E. M. (2004). Impaired decision making related to working memory deficits in individuals with substance addictions. Neuropsychology, 18(1), 152–162.
  • Bélanger, S., Belleville, S., & Gauthier, S. (2010). Inhibition impairments in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment and healthy aging: Effect of congruency proportion in a Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 581–590.
  • Benton, A. L., Hamsher, K., & Sivan, A. B. (1994). Multilingual aphasia examination: Manual of instructions. Iowa City: AJA Associates.
  • Binetti, G., Magni, E., Padovani, A., Cappa, S., Bianchetti, A., & Trabucchi, M. (1996). Executive dysfunction in early Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 60(1), 91–93.
  • Bird, C. M., & Burgess, N. (2008). The hippocampus and memory: Insights from spatial processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(3), 182–194.
  • Blesa, R., Pujol, M., Aguilar, M., Santacruz, P., Bertran-Serra, I., Hernández, G., … Group, N. (2001). Clinical validity of the ‘mini-mental state’for Spanish speaking communities. Neuropsychologia, 39(11), 1150–1157.
  • Bondi, M. W., Jak, A. J., Delano-Wood, L., Jacobson, M. W., Delis, D. C., & Salmon, D. P. (2008). Neuropsychological contributions to the early identification of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology Review, 18(1), 73–90.
  • Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991). Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathologica, 82(4), 239–259.
  • Brand, M. (2008). Does the feedback from previous trials influence current decisions? A study on the role of feedback processing in making decisions under explicit risk conditions. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2(2), 431–443.
  • Brand, M., Fujiwara, E., Borsutzky, S., Kalbe, E., Kessler, J., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2005). Decision-making deficits of Korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: Associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology, 19(3), 267–277.
  • Brand, M., Kalbe, E., Kracht, L. W., Riebel, U., Münch, J., Kessler, J., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2004). Organic and psychogenic factors leading to executive dysfunctions in a patient suffering from surgery of a colloid cyst of the Foramen of Monro. Neurocase, 10(6), 420–425.
  • Brand, M., Labudda, K., Kalbe, E., Hilker, R., Emmans, D., Fuchs, G., … Markowitsch, H. J. (2004). Decision-making impairments in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Behavioural Neurology, 15(3–4), 77–85.
  • Brand, M., Laier, C., Pawlikowski, M., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2009). Decision making with and without feedback: The role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(8), 984–998.
  • Brand, M., & Schiebener, J. (2013). Interactions of age and cognitive functions in predicting decision making under risky conditions over the life span. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(1), 9–23.
  • Brand, M., Schiebener, J., Pertl, M.-T., & Delazer, M. (2014). Know the risk, take the win: How executive functions and probability processing influence advantageous decision making under risk conditions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 36(9), 914–929.
  • Burgio, F., Delazer, M., Meneghello, F., Pertl, M.-T., Semenza, C., & Zamarian, L. (2018). Cognitive training improves ratio processing and decision making in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 64(4), 1213–1226.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
  • de Siqueira, A. S. S., Yokomizo, J. E., Jacob-Filho, W., Yassuda, M. S., & Aprahamian, I. (2017). Review of decision-making in game tasks in elderly participants with Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 43, 81–88.
  • Delazer, M., Sinz, H., Zamarian, L., & Benke, T. (2007). Decision-making with explicit and stable rules in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 1632–1641.
  • Engelmann, J. B., Capra, C. M., Noussair, C., & Berns, G. S. (2009). Expert financial advice neurobiologically “offloads” financial decision-making under risk. PloS one, 4(3), e4957.
  • Euteneuer, F., Schaefer, F., Stuermer, R., Boucsein, W., Timmermann, L., Barbe, M. T., … Kalbe, E. (2009). Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A neuropsychological and psychophysiological study. Neuropsychologia, 47(13), 2882–2890.
  • Figner, B., Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 709–730.
  • Finucane, M. L., & Lees, N. B. (2005). Decision-making competence of older adults: Models and methods. Paper presented at the National research Councul Workshop on Decision Making by Older Adults, Washington DC.
  • Finucane, M. L., Mertz, C., Slovic, P., & Schmidt, E. S. (2005). Task complexity and older adults’ decision-making competence. Psychology and Aging, 20(1), 71–84.
  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.
  • Freitas, S., Simões, M. R., Alves, L., & Santana, I. (2013). Montreal cognitive assessment: Validation study for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 27(1), 37–43.
  • Gleichgerrcht, E., Ibáñez, A., Roca, M., Torralva, T., & Manes, F. (2010). Decision-making cognition in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature Reviews Neurology, 6(11), 611–623.
  • Goldberg, T. E., Harvey, P. D., Wesnes, K. A., Snyder, P. J., & Schneider, L. S. (2015). Practice effects due to serial cognitive assessment: Implications for preclinical Alzheimer’s disease randomized controlled trials. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, 1(1), 103–111.
  • Grady, C. L., Haxby, J., Horwitz, B., Sundaram, M., Berg, G., Schapiro, M., … Rapoport, S. (1988). Longitudinal study of the early neuropsychological and cerebral metabolic changes in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10(5), 576–596.
  • Hachinski, V. C., Iliff, L. D., Zilhka, E., Du Boulay, G. H., McAllister, V. L., Marshall, J., … Symon, L. (1975). Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Archives of Neurology, 32(9), 632–637.
  • Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (1995). Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer’s disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications. Neuropsychologia, 33(4), 441–459.
  • Hodges, J. R., Salmon, D. P., & Butters, N. (1990). Differential impairment of semantic and episodic memory in Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s diseases: A controlled prospective study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 53(12), 1089–1095.
  • Ivnik, R. J., Malec, J. F., Smith, G. E., Tangalos, E. G., & Petersen, R. C. (1996). Neuropsychological tests’ norms above age 55: COWAT, BNT, MAE token, WRAT-R reading, AMNART, STROOP, TMT, and JLO. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10(3), 262–278.
  • Lafleche, G., & Albert, M. S. (1995). Executive function deficits in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 9(3), 313–320.
  • Lejarraga, T., & Gonzalez, C. (2011). Effects of feedback and complexity on repeated decisions from description. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 286–295.
  • Liebherr, M., Schiebener, J., Averbeck, H., & Brand, M. (2017). Decision making under ambiguity and objective risk in higher age–a review on cognitive and emotional contributions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2128.
  • MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 126–135.
  • McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Report of the NINCDS‐ADRDA work group under the auspices of department of health and human services task force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 34(7), 939–944.
  • Morris, R. G., & Kopelman, M. D. (1986). The memory deficits in Alzheimer-type dementia: A review. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 38(4), 575–602.
  • Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 105–125.
  • Mueller, S. M., Schiebener, J., Stöckigt, G., & Brand, M. (2017). Short-and long-term consequences in decision-making under risk: Immediate feedback about long-term prospects benefits people tending to impulsive processing. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 217–239.
  • Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., … Chertkow, H. (2005). The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699.
  • Nelson, H. E. (1976). A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex, 12(4), 313–324.
  • Nelson, P. T., Alafuzoff, I., Bigio, E. H., Bouras, C., Braak, H., Cairns, N. J., … Tredici, K. D. (2012). Correlation of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: A review of the literature. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 71(5), 362–381.
  • Perry, R. J., Watson, P., & Hodges, J. R. (2000). The nature and staging of attention dysfunction in early (minimal and mild) Alzheimer’s disease: Relationship to episodic and semantic memory impairment. Neuropsychologia, 38(3), 252–271.
  • Pertl, M.-T., Zamarian, L., & Delazer, M. (2017). Reasoning and mathematical skills contribute to normatively superior decision making under risk: Evidence from the game of dice task. Cognitive processing, 18(3), 249–260.
  • Schiebener, J., & Brand, M. (2015a). Decision making under objective risk conditions – A review of cognitive and emotional correlates, strategies, feedback processing, and external influences. Neuropsychology Review, 25(2), 1–28.
  • Schiebener, J., & Brand, M. (2015b). Self-reported strategies in decisions under risk: Role of feedback, reasoning abilities, executive functions, short-term-memory, and working memory. Cognitive Processing, 16(4), 401–416.
  • Schiebener, J., & Brand, M. (2017). Age-related variance in decisions under ambiguity is explained by changes in reasoning, executive functions, and decision-making under risk. Cognition and Emotion, 31(4), 816–824.
  • Schiebener, J., Wegmann, E., Gathmann, B., Laier, C., Pawlikowski, M., & Brand, M. (2014). Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1386), 1–13.
  • Schiebener, J., Wegmann, E., Pawlikowski, M., & Brand, M. (2012). Anchor effects in decision making can be reduced by the interaction between goal monitoring and the level of the decision maker’s executive functions. Cognitive Processing, 13(4), 321–332.
  • Schiebener, J., Wegmann, E., Pawlikowski, M., & Brand, M. (2013). Supporting decisions under risk: Explicit advice differentially affects people according to their working memory performance and executive functioning. Neuroscience of Decision Making, 1, 9–18.
  • Schiebener, J., Zamarian, L., Delazer, M., & Brand, M. (2011). Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: What does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(9), 1025–1039.
  • Sinz, H., Zamarian, L., Benke, T., Wenning, G., & Delazer, M. (2008). Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 46(7), 2043–2055.
  • Skovlund, E., & Fenstad, G. U. (2001). Should we always choose a nonparametric test when comparing two apparently nonnormal distributions? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(1), 86–92.
  • Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245.
  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662.
  • Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1994). The influence of decision aids on choice strategies: An experimental analysis of the role of cognitive effort. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(1), 36–74.
  • Tombaugh, T. N., & McIntyre, N. J. (1992). The mini‐mental state examination: A comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40(9), 922–935.
  • Wechsler, D., Coalson, D. L., & Raiford, S. E. (1997). WAIS-III: Wechsler adult intelligence scale. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  • Welsh, K. A., Butters, N., Hughes, J. P., Mohs, R. C., & Heyman, A. (1992). Detection and staging of dementia in Alzheimer’s disease: Use of the neuropsychological measures developed for the consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease. Archives of Neurology, 49(5), 448–452.
  • Yaniv, I. (2004). Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93(1), 1–13.
  • Zamarian, L., Sinz, H., Bonatti, E., Gamboz, N., & Delazer, M. (2008). Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk. Neuropsychology, 22(5), 645–657.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.