Relevance of the assessment mode in the digital assessment of processing speed

References

• Alfonsson, S., Maathz, P., Hursti, T., & Eysenbach, G. (2014). Interformat reliability of digital psychiatric self-report questionnaires: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), e268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bando, S., Asano, H., & Nozawa, A. (2017). Analysis of physiological effect of reading books by paper and electronic medium. Electronics and Communications in Japan, 100(5), 44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, K. K., Atkinson, T. M., & Ryan, J. P. (2008). Evidence of practice effects in variants of the trail making test during serial assessment. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(3), 312–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canini, M., Battista, P., Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Salvatore, C., Gilardi, M. C., & Castiglioni, I. (2014). Computerized neuropsychological assessment in aging: Testing efficacy and clinical ecology of different interfaces. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2014, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R., & Alloway, T. (2018). Computer versus paper-based testing: Are they equivalent when it comes to working memory? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 0734282918761496. doi:10.1177/0734282918761496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, S. F. (1998). The differential contribution of mental tracking, cognitive flexibility, visual search, and motor speed to performance on parts A and B of the trail making test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(5), 585–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demaree, H. A., DeLuca, J., Gaudino, E. A., & Diamond, B. J. (1999). Speed of information processing as a key deficit in multiple sclerosis: Implications for rehabilitation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 67(5), 661–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drapeau, C. E., Bastien-Toniazzo, M., Rous, C., & Carlier, M. (2007). Nonequivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of trail making test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104(3), 785–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows, R. P., Dahmen, J., Cook, D., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2016). Multicomponent analysis of a digital trail making test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 154–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates, N. J., & Kochan, N. A. (2015). Computerized and on-line neuropsychological testing for late-life cognition and neurocognitive disorders: Are we there yet? Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28(2), 165–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerth, S., Dolk, T., Klassert, A., Fliesser, M., Fischer, M. H., Nottbusch, G., & Festman, J. (2016a). Adapting to the surface: A comparison of handwriting measures when writing on a tablet computer and on paper. Human Movement Science, 48, 62–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerth, S., Klassert, A., Dolk, T., Fliesser, M., Fischer, M. H., Nottbusch, G., & Festman, J. (2016b). Is handwriting performance affected by the writing surface? Comparing preschoolers’, second graders’, and adults’ writing performance on a tablet vs. paper. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwaltney, C. J., Shields, A. L., & Shiffman, S. (2008). Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review. Value in Health, 11(2), 322–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2003). To err is autonomic: Error‐related brain potentials, ANS activity, and post‐error compensatory behavior. Psychophysiology, 40(6), 895–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109(4), 679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A., Lindsay, S., Eslambolchilar, P., Thornton, I. M., & Tales, A. (2016). Administering cognitive tests through touch screen tablet devices: Potential issues. Journal of Alzheimers Disease, 54(3), 1169–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakauer, J. W., Mazzoni, P., Ghazizadeh, A., Ravindran, R., & Shadmehr, R. (2006). Generalization of motor learning depends on the history of prior action. PLOS Biology, 4(10), e316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T. A., Hoffman, N. M., & Donders, J. (2003). Clinical utility of the trail making test ratio score. Applied Neuropsychology, 10(3), 163–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., Michels, L. C., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2007). Are Internet and paper-and-pencil personality tests truly comparable? An experimental design measurement invariance study. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 322–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misdraji, E. L., & Gass, C. S. (2010). The trail making test and its neurobehavioral components. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32(2), 159–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montag, C., Duke, É., & Markowetz, A. (2016). Toward psychoinformatics: Computer science meets psychology. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2016, 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muehlhausen, W., Doll, H., Quadri, N., Fordham, B., O’Donohoe, P., Dogar, N., & Wild, D. J. (2015). Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulert, C., Gallinat, J., Dorn, H., Herrmann, W. M., & Winterer, G. (2003). The relationship between reaction time, error rate and anterior cingulate cortex activity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 47(2), 175–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, J. M., & Garland, K. J. (2008). Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? Ergonomics, 51(9), 1352–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, W., & Roth, E. (1987). Der Zahlenverbindungstest [The connecting numbers test]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, N. D., van Dijk, E. J., Den Heijer, T., Vermeer, S. E., Jolles, J., Koudstaal, P. J., … Breteler, M. M. B. (2005). Cerebral small-vessel disease and decline in information processing speed, executive function and memory. Brain, 128(9), 2034–2041.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reitan, R. M. (1958). Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8(3), 271–276.
   Google Scholar
• Riva, G., Teruzzi, T., & Anolli, L. (2003). The use of the internet in psychological research: Comparison of online and offline questionnaires. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6(1), 73–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A., & Fristoe, N. M. (1995). Process analysis of adult age effects on a computer-administered trail making test. Neuropsychology, 9(4), 518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A., Toth, J., Daniels, K., Parks, C., Pak, R., Wolbrette, M., & Hocking, K. J. (2000). Effects of aging on efficiency of task switching in a variant of the trail making test. Neuropsychology, 14(1), 102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Cubillo, I., Perianez, J. A., Adrover-Roig, D., Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. M., Rios-Lago, M., Tirapu, J., & Barceló, F. (2009). Construct validity of the trail making test: Role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(3), 438–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, M. A., Pennington, B. F., Yerys, B. E., Scott, A., Boada, R., Willcutt, E. G., … DeFries, J. C. (2006). Processing speed deficits in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reading disability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(5), 584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N. (2004). Trail making test A and B: Normative data stratified by age and education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(2), 203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ballegooijen, W., Riper, H., Cuijpers, P., van Oppen, P., & Smit, J. H. (2016). Validation of online psychometric instruments for common mental health disorders: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vora, J. P., Varghese, R., Weisenbach, S. L., & Bhatt, T. (2016). Test-retest reliability and validity of a custom-designed computerized neuropsychological cognitive test battery in young healthy adults. Journal of Psychology and Cognition, 1(1), 11–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zabramski, S. (2011). Careless touch: A comparative evaluation of mouse, pen, and touch input in shape tracing task. Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, 11, 329–332.
   Google Scholar
• Zabramski, S., & Stuerzlinger, W. (2012). The effect of shape properties on ad-hoc shape replication with mouse, pen, and touch input. Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference, 12, 275–278.
   Google Scholar
• Zygouris, S., & Tsolaki, M. (2014). Computerized cognitive testing for older adults: A review. American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias, 30(1), 13–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar