Manipulating the decision making process: Influencing a “gut” reaction

References

• Ahn, W.-Y., Busemeyer, J. R., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Stout, J. C. (2008). Comparison of decision. Learning models using the generalization criterion method. Cognitive Science, 32, 1376–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alley, T., & Greene, M. (2008). The relative and perceived impact of irrelevant speech, vocal music and non-vocal music on working memory. Current Psychology, 27, 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2019). The smart system 1: Evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem. Thinking & Reasoning, 25, 257–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (in press). The intuitive greater good: Testing the corrective dual process model of moral cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.1037/xge0000533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A. (2007). Iowa gambling task professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychologica Assessment Resources Incl.
   Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Anderson, S. W. (1998). Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 428–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 215–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, C. H., Evans, C. E. Y., & Turnbull, O. H. (2005). Artificial time constraints on the Iowa gambling task: The effects on behavioral performance and subjective experience. Brain and Cognition, 57, 21–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., Recknor, E. C., Grabenhorst, F., & Bechara, A. (2007). Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 86–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver, S. L., Thoemmes, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 333–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brevers, D., Noel, X., Bechara, A., Vanavermaete, N., Verbanck, P., & Kornreich, C. (2015). Effect of casino-related sound, red light and pairs on decision-making during the Iowa gambling task. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 409–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buelow, M. T., Frakey, L. L., Grace, J., & Friedman, J. H. (2013). The contribution of apathy and additional learning trials to risky decision making in Parkinson’s disease. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28, 356–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buelow, M. T., Okdie, B. M., & Blaine, A. L. (2013). Seeing the forest through the trees: Improving decision making on the Iowa gambling task by shifting focus from short- to long-term outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buelow, M. T., & Suhr, J. A. (2009). Construct validity of the Iowa gambling task. Neuropsychology Review, 19, 102–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buelow, M. T., & Suhr, J. A. (2013). Personality characteristics and state mood influence individual deck selections on the Iowa gambling task. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 593–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., & Stout, J. C. (2002). A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment, 14, 253–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroselli, J. S., Hiscock, M., Scheibel, R. S., & Ingram, F. (2006). The simulated gambling paradigm applied to young adults: An examination of university students’ performance. Applied Neuropsychology, 13, 203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S., & Pasqualini, M. C. S. (2004). Stronger autonomic response accompanies better learning: A test of Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 901–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella, M., Dymond, S., Cooper, A., & Turnbull, O. (2007). Effects of decision-phase time constraints on emotion-based learning in the Iowa gambling task. Brain and Cognition, 64, 164–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. J., & Pronin, E. (2012). Fast thought speed induces risk taking. Psychological Science, 23, 370–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y.-C., Huang, J.-T., Duann, J.-R., & Lin, C.-H. (2018). Twenty years after the Iowa gambling task: Rationality, emotion, and decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y. C., & Lin, C. H. (2007). Is deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa gambling task? Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, 37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y.-C., Lin, C.-H., Huang, J.-T., Lin, S., Lee, P.-L., & Hsieh, J.-C. (2008). Immediate gain is long-term loss: Are there foresighted decision makings in the Iowa gambling task? Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4, 13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1978). Problem solving strategies: A selection mechanism, some implications, and some data. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 307–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1980). A further examination of the selection of problem-solving strategies: The effects of deadlines and analytic aptitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crone, E. A., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004). Developmental changes in real life decision making: Performance on a gambling task previously shown to depend on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25, 251–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descarte’s error. New York, NY: Grosset/Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• De Neys, W. (2006). Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1070–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Pennycook, G. (in press). Logic, fast and slow: Advances in dual-process theorizing. Current Directions in Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/0963721419855658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Schaeken, W. (2007). When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature. Experimental Psychology, 54, 128–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005). Working memory and everyday conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhibition of stored counterexamples. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 349–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Verschueren, N. (2006). Working memory capacity and a notorious brain teaser: The case of the Monty Hall dilemma. Experimental Psychology, 53, 123–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDonno, M. A., & Demaree, H. A. (2008). Perceived time pressure and the Iowa gambling task. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 636–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich, A. (2008). A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks. Perceptual Psychophysics, 70, 229–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2006). Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: Bound-change, drift rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis. Perceptual Psychophysics, 68, 194–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromey, C., & Shim, E. (2008). The effects of divided attention on speech motor, verbal fluency, and manual task performance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1171–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 239–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslinger, P. J., & Damasio, A. R. (1985). Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR. Neurology, 35, 1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gansler, D. A., Jerram, M. W., Vannorsdall, T. D., & Schretlen, D. J. (2011a). Does the Iowa gambling task measure executive function? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26, 706–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansler, D. A., Jerram, M. W., Vannorsdall, T. D., & Schretlen, D. J. (2011b). Comparing alternative metrics to assess performance on the Iowa gambling task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 1040–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., de Beurs, E., & van den Brink, W. (2005). Decision making in pathological gambling: A comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 137–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hafenbradl, S., Waeger, D., Marewski, J. N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2016). Applied decision making with fast-and-frugal heuristics. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5, 215–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz, R., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Focusing the spotlight: Individual differences in visual attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 217–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz, R. P. (2014). The speed-accuracy tradeoff: History, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henninger, D. E., Madden, D. J., & Huettel, S. A. (2010). Processing speed and memory mediate age-related differences in decision making. Psychology and Aging, 25, 262–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth, R. M., & Karelaia, N. (2007). Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments. Psychological Review, 114, 733–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-T., Georgiev, D., Foltynie, T., Limousin, P., Speekenbrink, M., & Jahanshahi, M. (2015). Different effects of dopaminergic medication on perceptual decision-making in Parkinson’s disease as a function of task difficulty and speed-accuracy instructions. Neuropsychologia, 75, 577–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahnemann, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, C. H., Hsiao, S., Liu, G. C., Yen, J. Y., Yang, M. J., & Yen, C. F. (2010). The characteristics of decision making, potential to take risks, and personality of college students with internet addiction. Psychiatry Research, 175, 121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 665–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. H., Chiu, Y. C., Lee, P. L., & Hsieh, J. C. (2007). Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa gambling task? Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, 16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. H., Song, T. J., Chen, Y. Y., Lee, W. K., & Chiu, Y. C. (2013). Reexamining the validity and reliability of the clinical version of the Iowa gambling task: Evidence from a normal subject group. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijboer, M., Borst, J. P., van Rijn, H., & Taatgen, N. A. (2016). Driving and multitasking: The good, the bad, and the dangerous. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel, X., Bechara, A., Dan, B., Hanak, C., & Verbanck, P. (2007). Response inhibition deficit is involved in poor decision making under risk in nonamnesic individuals with alcoholism. Neuropsychology, 21, 778–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overman, W. H., Frassrand, K., Ansel, S., Trawalter, S., Bies, B., & Redmond, A. (2004). Performance on the IOWA card task by adolescents and adults. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1838–1851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabst, S., Brand, M., & Wolf, O. T. (2013). Stress effects on framed decisions: There are differences for gains and losses. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabst, S., Schoofs, D., Pawlikowski, M., Brand, M., & Wolf, O. T. (2013). Paradoxical effects of stress and an executive task on decisions under risk. Behavioral Neuroscience, 127, 369–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, M. P. (2005). Neurobiology of decision-making: Quo vadis? Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 2–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, B., Heathcote, A., Donkin, C., Averell, L., & Brown, S. (2014). The hare and the tortoise: Emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1226–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Thompson, C. A., & McKoon, G. (2015). Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy. Cognition, 137, 115–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, L. M., Meador-Woodruff, J. H., & Dalack, G. W. (2004). Neurocognitive measures of prefrontal cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 68, 65–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilt, T., Goudriaan, A. E., Koeter, M. W., van Den Brink, W., & Schmand, B. (2009). Decision making as a predictor of first ecstasy use: A prospective study. Psychopharmacology, 203, 519–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevy, S., Burdick, K. E., Visweswaraiah, H., Abdelmessih, S., Lukin, M., & Bechara, A. (2007). Iowa gambling task in schizophrenia: A review and new data in patients with schizophrenia and co-occurring cannabis use disorders. Schizophrenia Research, 92, 74–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simen, P., Contreras, D., Buck, C., Hu, P., Holmes, P., & Cohen, J. D. (2009). Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: Empirical tests of theoretical predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1865–1897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starcke, K., Pawlikowski, M., Wolf, O., Altsötter-Gleich, C., & Brand, M. (2011). Decision-making under risk conditions is susceptible to interference by a secondary executive task. Cognitive Process, 12, 177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan-Toole, H., DePasque, S., Holt-Gosselin, B., & Galvan, A. (2019). Worth working for: The influence of effort costs on teens’ choices during a novel decision making game. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 37, 100652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., Sorege, G. B., Benoit, A., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa gambling task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 562–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadham, N. P., Hart, C. L., van Gorp, W. G., Gunderson, E. W., Haney, M., & Foltin, R. W. (2007). Acute effects of smoked marijuana on decision making, as assessed by a modified gambling task, in experienced marijuana users. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, C. A., DelDonno, S., & Killgore, W. D. (2014). The role of cognitive versus emotional intelligence in Iowa gambling task performance: What’s emotion got to do with it? Intelligence, 44, 112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-fourth edition: Professional manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson PsychCorp.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzlaff, H., Bauer, M., Maess, B., & Heekeren, H. R. (2011). Neural characterization of the speed-accuracy tradeoff in a perceptual decision-making task. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1254–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthy, D. A., Otto, A. R., & Maddox, W. T. (2012). Working-memory load and temporal myopia in dynamic decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1640–1658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yechiam, E., Stout, J. C., Busemeyer, J. R., Rock, S. L., & Finn, P. R. (2005). Individual differences in the response to forgone payoffs: An examination of high functioning drug abusers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar