Standardized item selection for alternate computerized versions of Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test(-based) word lists

References

• Adelman, J. S., & Estes, Z. (2013). Emotion and memory: A recognition advantage for positive and negative words independent of arousal. Cognition, 129(3), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, A., Trumpeter, N. N., & Weathington, B. L. (2006). Gender differences in memory recall. Modern Psychological Studies, 12(1), 11–16. https://scholar.utc.edu/mps/vol12/iss1/3/
   Google Scholar
• Baluch, B., & Danaye-Tousie, M. (2006). Memory for words as a function of spelling transparency. The Journal of Psychology, 140(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.140.2.95-104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatarah, P., Ward, G., Smith, J., & Hayes, L. (2009). Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: Similar patterns of rehearsal and similar effects of word length, presentation rate, and articulatory suppression. Memory & Cognition, 37(5), 689–713. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.5.689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilder, R. M., & Reise, S. P. (2019). Neuropsychological tests of the future: How do we get there from here? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(2), 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1521993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boake, C. (2000). Edouard Claparede and the auditory verbal learning test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(2), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1076/1380-3395(200004)22:2;1-1;FT286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boenniger, M. M., Staerk, C., Coors, A., Huijbers, W., Ettinger, U., & Breteler, M. M. (2021). Ten German versions of Rey’s auditory verbal learning test: Age and sex effects in 4,000 adults of the Rhineland Study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 43(1–17), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2021.1984398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brand, N., & Jolles, J. (1985). Learning and retrieval rate of words presented auditorily and visually. The Journal of General Psychology, 112(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1985.9711004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunet, H. E., Kramer, J. H., Lupas, G. J., & Foley, J. M. (2020). Strategy use and verbal memory in older adults: The role of intellectual functioning and the preferential impact of semantic clustering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(1), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1590640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2018). The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417727521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., De Deyne, S., Voorspoels, W., & Storms, G. (2014). Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. Acta Psychologica, 150, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chance, F. S., & Kahana, M. J. (1997). Testing the role of associative interference and compound cues in sequence memory. In Bower, J.M. (ed.), Computational Neuroscience (pp. 599–603). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9800-5_93
   Google Scholar
• De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2007). Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Acta Psychologica, 124(3), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Vigliocco, G., & Cappa, S. F. (2010). Beyond the abstract—concrete dichotomy: Mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1042–1048. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vent, N. R., Agelink, V. R., Schmand, J. A., Murre, B. A., & Huizenga, J. M., & ANDI Consortium. (2016). Advanced Neuropsychological Diagnostics Infrastructure (ANDI): A normative database created from control datasets. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (1999). Factors in the incidental acquisition of second language vocabulary from oral input. In Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 35–61). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/sibil.17.06ell
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N., & Beaton, A. (1993). Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46(3), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, H. E., Murre, J. M., Vermeulen, I. E., Kieffer, J. M., & Schagen, S. B. (2018). Reliability and validity of a self-administered tool for online neuropsychological testing: The Amsterdam cognition scan. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 40(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2017.1339017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, H. E., Vermeulen, I. E., Murre, J. M., & Schagen, S. B. (2018). Online self-administered cognitive testing using the Amsterdam cognition scan: Establishing psychometric properties and normative data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(5), e192. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9298
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glanzer, M., & Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80044-0
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, D., Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2019). Common concerns with MTurk as a participant pool: Evidence and solutions. In F. R. Kardes, P. M. Herr, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in consumer psychology (pp. 319–337). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, D. J., Crawford, M., & Holdsworth, M. (1992). Gender‐linked differences in everyday memory performance. British Journal of Psychology, 83(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02436.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hourihan, K. L., Fraundorf, S. H., & Benjamin, A. S. (2017). The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall. Memory & Cognition, 45(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0646-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaver, P., Fell, J., Dietl, T., Schür, S., Schaller, C., Elger, C. E., & Fernández, G. (2005). Word imageability affects the hippocampus in recognition memory. Hippocampus,15, 15(6), 704–712. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Loring, D. W., & Fischer, J. S. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., Schweickert, R., & Gandour, J. (2000). The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: Positions of shared phonemes. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1116–1125. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madan, C. R. (2021). Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 583–595. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01820-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, S., & Pfeifer, G. (2012). Personality differences in mental imagery and the effects on verbal memory. British Journal of Psychology, 103(4), 556–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02094.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moors, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., Wanmaker, S., Van Schie, K., Van Harmelen, A. L., De Schryver, M., De Winne, J., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4,300 Dutch words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0243-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual-coding approach. Oxford Univ.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1p2), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Edwards, J. D., Henry, L. C., & Goodyear, B. G. (2007). Neural correlates of concreteness in semantic categorization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(8), 1407–1419. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirier, M., & Saint-Aubin, J. (1995). Memory for related and unrelated words: Further evidence on the influence of semantic factors in immediate serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 48(2), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401396
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Konick, A. F. (1966). On the role of interference in short-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023458
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rey, A. (1941). L’examen psychologique dans les cas d’encéphalopathie traumatique. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 286–340.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, A. (1958). L’examen clinique en psychologie. Press Universitaire de France.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, T. A. (2001). From the known to the unknown: Using cognates to teach English to Spanish-speaking literates. The Reading Teacher, 54(8), 744–746. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20204987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., Jurado, M. B., & Salvatierra, J. L. (2014). Cognate facilitation effect in balanced and non-balanced Spanish–English bilinguals using the Boston Naming Test. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(6), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006912466313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (2017). Item analyses of memory differences. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 39(4), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2016.1226267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W. M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. M., & Harrison, D. W. (1990). Alternate forms of the AVLT: A procedure and test of form equivalency. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 5(4), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/5.4.405
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor, E. M. (1959). Psychological appraisal of children with cerebral defects. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Miller, A. L., & Robison, M. K. (2019). Individual differences in encoding strategies and free recall dynamics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(10), 2495–2508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819847441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Elst, W. I. M., Van Boxtel, M. P., Van Breukelen, G. J., & Jolles, J. (2005). Rey’s verbal learning test: Normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24–81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11(3), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617705050344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhage, F. (1964). Intelligentie en leeftijd: Onderzoek bij Nederlanders van twaalf tot zevenenzeventig jaar. Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, I., & Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(5), 1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wefel, J. S., Kesler, S. R., Noll, K. R., & Schagen, S. B. (2015). Clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of noncentral nervous system cancer‐related cognitive impairment in adults. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 65(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar