A Q factor analysis of college undergraduate students' study behaviours

References

• Addams, H., & Proops, J. (Eds.). (2000). Social discourse and environmental policy: An application of Q methodology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269–298. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balduf, M. (2009). Underachievement among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 274–294. doi: 10.1177/1932202X0902000204
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, L. B., & Mueller, R. J. (1987). Assessing study behaviors of college students: Findings from a new instrument. Journal of Developmental Education, 11(2), 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, L. B., & Mueller, R. J. (1993). An instrument for the assessment of study behaviors of college students. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(4), 46–52. doi: 10.1080/19388079309558132
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, L. B., & Sandiford, J. R. (2004). Linking study behaviors and student culture to academic success among Hispanic students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28, 281–295. doi: 10.1080/10668920490256462
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. D. (1986). Q technique and method: Principles and procedures. In W. D. Berry & M. S. Lewis-Beck (Eds.), New tools for social scientists (pp. 57–76). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. D. (1991). Bridging organizations and sustainable development. Human Resources, 44, 807–831.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1971). The forced-free distinction in Q-technique. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 283–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1971.tb00939.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1993). A Primer on Q Methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16, 91–138.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, C. (1972). The reciprocity principle. In S. R. Brown & D. J. Brenner (Eds.), Science, psychology, and communication: Essays honoring William Stephenson (pp. 39–56). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, W. (2012, September). Investigating student preferences of faculty teaching methods in relation to their own learning styles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, A. H. C., & Choi, J. N. (2005). Rethinking procrastination: Positive effects of “active” procrastination behavior on attitudes and performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 245–263. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.145.3.245-264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins, L. A. (2011, September). Ready or not: Remedial education for college students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. L. (1982, March). Self-efficacy and ability in achievement behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P., Maguire, M., & O'Dell, L. (2002). Smokers’ representations of their own smoking: A Q-methodological study. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 641–652. doi:10.1177/1359105302007006868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta, Z. M. (2007). The effect of instruction on the study behaviors and academic achievement of community college students. ProQuest ETD Collection for FIU (Paper AAI3268644). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/dissertations/AAI3268644
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibenedetto, M. K., & Bembenutty, H. (2011, April). Within the pipeline: Self-regulated learning and academic achievement among college students in science courses. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Eilam, B., & Aharon, I. (2003). Students’ planning in the process of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 304–334. doi: 10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00042-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, J. R. (2001). Procrastination as self-regulation failure of performance: Effects of cognitive load, self-awareness and time limits on “working best under pressure”. European Journal of Personality, 15, 391–406. doi: 10.1002/per.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galayda, J. (2006). Community supported agriculture, economic preference theory and subjective well-being (Doctoral dissertation). Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Available from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 3232608)
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Ros, R., Perez-Gonzalez, F., & Hinojosa, E. (2004). Assessing time management skills as an important aspect of student learning: The construction and evaluation of a time management scale with Spanish high school students. School Psychology International, 25, 167–183. doi: 10.1177/0143034304043684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., Dixon, S., Stansal, E., Gelb, S. L., & Pheri, T. (2008). Time diary and questionnaire assessment of factors associated with academic and personal success among university undergraduates. Journal of American College Health, 56, 706–715. doi: 10.3200/JACH.56.6.706-715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, J., & Hughes, M. (2007). Skills, learning styles and success of first-year undergraduates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8, 259–273. doi: 10.1177/1469787407081881
   Google Scholar
• Janson, C. (2009). High school counselors’ views of their leadership behaviors: A Q Methodology Study. Professional School Counseling, 13, 86–97. doi: 10.5330/PSC.n.2010-13.86
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. A. (2011). Application of Q-methodology and relational leadership to understanding superintendent and board members’ relations using emotional and multiple intelligences theories (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3413635)
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. H., Slate, J. R., Perez, E., & Marini, I. (1996). Graduate students’ study skills as a function of academic achievement, sex, conceptions of intelligence, and locus of control. New Directions for Education Reform, 3, 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kanfer, F. H. (1971). The maintenance of behavior by self-generated stimuli and reinforcement. In A. Jacobs & L. B. Sachs (Eds.), The psychology of private events (pp. 398–416). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, G. (2011, September). Can Q enhance the acceptance of market-based instruments for environmental objectives? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kitsantas, A. (2002). Test preparation and performance: A self-regulatory analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 101–113. doi: 10.1080/00220970209599501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitsantas, A., Winsler, A., & Huie, F. (2008). Self-regulation and ability predictors of academic success during college: A predictive validity study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 42–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lahmers, A. G., & Zulauf, C. R. (2001). Factors associated with academic time use and academic performance of college students: A recursive approach. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 544–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mally, M. (2011, September). International regional political organizations as lobbyists in the multilevel governance system of the Baltic Sea area – a Q methodological study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, M. A. (2004). The validation of an instrument for the assessment of study behaviors of high school students (ProQuest ETD Collection for FIU Paper AAI3165165). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/dissertations/AAI3165165
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, M., Hinks, M., Stowell-Smith, M., Mercer, D., & Forster, J. (1999). Q methodology, risk management, and quality management. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 12, 254–266. doi: 10.1108/09526869910291823
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. B. (1988). Q methodology (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Vol. 66.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710–718. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morf, M. E., Miller, C. M., & Syrotuik, J. M. (1976). A comparison of cluster analysis and Q-factor analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 59–64. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197601)32:1<59::AID-JCLP2270320116>3.0.CO;2-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011a). A closer look at postsecondary education by institution level and control. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/analysis/2011-section4.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011b). Indicator 22: Remediation and degree completion. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011033_4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Indicator 45: Postsecondary Graduation Rates. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012045_4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., & Newman, C. (2000). A discussion of low R-squares: Concerns and uses. Educational Research Quarterly, 24(2), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., & Ramlo, S. E. (2010). The use of two multivariate techniques, Q methodology and Q factor analysis, to facilitate interpretation of mixed methods research. In C. Teddlie & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 505–530). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2006). Academic performance of college students: Influence of time spent studying and working. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 151–159. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.81.3.151-159
   Google Scholar
• Ogonor, B. O., & Nwadiani, M. (2006). An analysis of non-instructional time management of undergraduates in southern Nigeria. College Student Journal, 40, 204–217.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578. doi: 10.3102/00346543066004543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 111–139). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–501). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In R. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 731–810). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poling, S. J. (2009). Superintendents’ leadership behaviors for DIBELS implementation: A comparative case study of principals’ and superintendents’ perceptions (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3352601)
   Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. (2008). Student perspectives on learning physics and their relationship with learning force and motion concepts: A study using Q methodology. Human Subjectivity, 2, 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Schmolck, P. (May 13, 2011). QMethod Page. Retrieved from http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/#PQMethod
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139. doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 349–367). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, E. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71–81. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2001). The use of q-methodology to assess the possibility that fear is a barrier preventing the use of mental health services by African American men (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9980582)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. W. (2001). Current systems in psychology: History, theory, research, and applications. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 65–94. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1975). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester, J. (2010, October). Public attitudes toward health care reform and the media that drive them. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Arkon, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Szu, E., Nandagopal, K., Shavelson, R. J., Lopez, E. J, Penn, J. H., Scharberg, M., & Hill, G. W. (2011). Understanding academic performance in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 1238–1242. doi: 10.1021/ed900067m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorman, J., & Howard, M. (2011, September). College choice: Student perceptions regarding the influence of past, present and future. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2011, September). Exploring Chinese medicine's diversity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22. doi: 10.1007/BF02504714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. F. (2003). A study of nurse caring behaviors using Q methodology (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3088014)
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. L. F. (2002). Russian consumer attitudes toward American advertising (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3074456)
   Google Scholar
• Wink, B., Henderson, S., Coe, D., & Read, A. (2012, September). It's a shame: Student perspectives on academic misconduct. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. R., Klemz, B. R., & Murphy, W. J. (2003). Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 130–142. doi: 10.1177/0273475303254004
   Google Scholar
• Yumusak, N., Sungur, S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Turkish high school students’ biology achievement in relation to academic self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 53–69. doi: 10.1080/13803610600853749
   Google Scholar
• Zenor, J., & Kinsey, D. (2011, September). Cool as a carrot? A Q-study on the marketing of carrots as junk food. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Satlykgylyjova, M. S., Almuhajiri, M., & Brown, S. R. (2012, September). Harvesting suggestions: A strategy for promoting policies designed to improve academic life for international students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73–86. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000a). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13–39). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000b). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862. doi: 10.3102/00028312031004845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1999). Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 241–250. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar