Expectancy theory outcomes and student evaluations of teaching

References

• Centra, J. A. (1979). Determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Hoshower, L. (2003). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 71–88. doi: 10.1080/02602930301683
   Google Scholar
• DeCanio, S. J. (1986). Student evaluations of teaching: A multinominal logit approach. The Journal of Economic Education, 17, 165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommeyer, C. J., Baum, P., Chapman, K. S., & Hanna, R. W. (2002). Attitudes of business faculty towards two methods of collecting teaching evaluations: Paper vs. online. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 455–462. doi: 10.1080/0260293022000009320
   Google Scholar
• Dommeyer, C. J., Baum, P., Hanna, R. W., & Chapman, K. S. (2004). Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online surveys: Their effects on response rates and evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 611–623. doi: 10.1080/02602930410001689171
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, J., Mader, C. E., & Shinsky, J. (2012). Constructive student feedback: Online vs. traditional course evaluations. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9, 283–296.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students’ ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don't. Research in Higher Education, 9, 199–242. doi: 10.1007/BF00976997
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1997). Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52, 1182–1186. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S., Conway, C. G., & Maxwell, S. E. (1985). Construct validity of measures of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 187–196. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.77.2.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (2002, April). Online student ratings: Will students respond? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Kasiar, J. B., Schroeder, S. L., & Holstaad, S. G. (2002). Comparison of traditional and web-based course evaluation processes in a required, team-taught pharmacotherapy course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 66, 268–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, B. H., DeCristoforo, J. R., & McGinty, D. (1999). Electronic versus traditional student ratings of instruction. Research in Higher Education, 40, 221–232. doi: 10.1023/A:1018738731032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707–754. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253–388. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52, 1187–1197. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ravelli, B. (2000, June). Anonymous online teaching assessments: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at the Annual National Conference of the American Association for Higher Education, Charlotte, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, R. W. (2002). Motivational processes – Expectancy theory. Retrieved from http://www.uri.edu/research/lrc/scholl/Notes/Motivation_Expectancy.html
   Google Scholar
• Stowell, J. R., Addison, W. E., & Smith, J. L. (2012). Comparison of online and classroom-based student evaluations of instruction. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 465–473. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.545869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, S. W. (2002, June). Online student evaluation of instruction: An investigation of non-response bias. Paper presented at the 42nd annual Forum for the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar