References
- Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2018). Free to choose: Can school choice reduce student achievement? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(1), 175–206. doi:10.1257/app.20160634
- Anderson, K., & Wolf, P. (2017). Evaluating school vouchers: Evidence from a within-study comparison (EDRE Working Paper No. 2017-10). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2952967
- Astley, W. G., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1983). Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 245–273. doi:10.2307/2392620
- Austin, M. J. (2015). Schools’ responses to voucher policy: Participation decisions and early implementation experiences in the Indiana Choice Scholarship Program. Journal of School Choice, 9(3), 354–379. doi:10.1080/15582159.2015.1061384
- Barnard, J., Frangakis, C. E., Hill, J. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2003). Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of school choice vouchers in New York City. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(462), 299–323. doi:10.1198/016214503000071
- Bator, F. M. (1958). The anatomy of market failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351–379. doi:10.2307/1882231
- Berends, M., Goldring, E., Stein, M., & Cravens, X. (2010). Instructional conditions in charter schools and students’ mathematics achievement gains. American Journal of Education, 116(3), 303–335. doi:10.1086/651411
- Bitler, M., Domina, T., Penner, E., & Hoynes, H. (2015). Distributional analysis in educational evaluation: A case study from the New York City voucher program. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 419–450. doi:10.1080/19345747.2014.921259
- Buchanan, J. M., & Tollison, R. D. (Eds.). (1984). The theory of public choice – II. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Bulletin 133, Part CLIII, Bulletin 133—Scholarship Programs (2014). Louisiana Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.doa.louisiana.gov/osr/lac/28v153/28v153.doc
- Cavazos, S. (2016, November 30). Six things to know about Indiana’s school voucher program, a model Betsy DeVos could support [Post]. Retrieved from http://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/in/2016/11/30/six-things-to-know-about-indianas-school-voucher-program-a-possible-model-for-betsy-devos/
- Center for Education Reform. (2014). School choice today: Voucher laws across the states. Retrieved from https://www.edreform.com/2014/08/school-choice-today-voucher-laws-across-the-states-1/
- Cheng, A., Trivitt, J. R., & Wolf, P. J. (2016). School choice and the branding of Milwaukee private schools. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 362–375. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12222
- Choice Scholarship, IC 20-51-4. (2011). Retrieved from http://iga.in.gov/static-documents/3/2/7/a/327ab5d9/TITLE20_AR51_ch4.pdf
- Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1988). Politics, markets, and the organization of schools. American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1065–1087. doi:10.2307/1961750
- Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
- Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
- Cowen, J. M. (2008). School choice as a latent variable: Estimating the “complier average causal effect” of vouchers in Charlotte. Policy Studies Journal, 36(2), 301–315. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00268.x
- Cowen, J. M., Fleming, D. J., Witte, J. F., Wolf, P. J., & Kisida, B. (2013). School vouchers and student attainment: Evidence from a state-mandated study of Milwaukee’s parental choice program. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 147–168. doi:10.1111/psj.12006
- Dacin, M. T. (1997). Isomorphism in context: The power and prescription of institutional norms. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 46–81. doi:10.2307/257020
- DeAngelis, C. A., & Holmes Erickson, H. (2018). What leads to successful school choice programs? A review of the theories and evidence. Cato Journal, 38(1), 247–263.
- Deke, J. (2014). Using the linear probability model to estimate impacts on binary outcomes in randomized controlled trials (Mathematica Policy Research Report No. 62a1477e274d429faf7e0c71ba1204b2). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/62a1477e274d429faf7e0c71ba1204b2.html#biblio
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
- Dynarski, M., Rui, N., Webber, A., & Gutmann, B. (2017). Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts after one year (NCEE 2017-4022). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED573822
- EdChoice. (2017). School choice in America dashboard. Retrieved from https://www.edchoice.org/school-choice/school-choice-in-america/
- Forster, G. (2016). A win-win solution. The empirical evidence on school choice. Retrieved from EdChoice website: https://www.edchoice.org/research/win-win-solution/
- Green, C. P., Navarro-Paniagua, M., Ximénez-de-Embún, D. P., & Mancebón, M.-J. (2014). School choice and student wellbeing. Economics of Education Review, 38, 139–150. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.11.007
- Greene, J. P. (2000). The effect of school choice: An evaluation of the Charlotte Children’s Scholarship Fund program. Civic Report, 12, 1–15.
- Greene, J. P., Peterson, P. E., & Du, J. (1999). Effectiveness of school choice: The Milwaukee experiment. Education and Urban Society, 31(2), 190–213. doi:10.1177/0013124599031002005
- Harris, D. (2017). Why managed competition is better than a free market for schooling. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/why-managed-competition-is-better-than-a-free-market-for-schooling/
- Hawley, A. (1968). Human ecology. In David L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 328–337). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Heller-Sahlgren, G. (2018). Smart but unhappy: Independent-school competition and the wellbeing-efficiency trade-off in education. Economics of Education Review, 62, 66–81. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.10.005
- Hess, F. M. (2010). Does school choice “work”. National Affairs, 5(1), 35–53.
- Hitt, C., McShane, M. Q., & Wolf, P. J. (2018). Do impacts on test scores even matter? Lessons from long-run outcomes in school choice research. Retrieved from American Enterprise Institute website: https://www.aei.org/publication/do-impacts-on-test-scores-even-matter-lessons-from-long-run-outcomes-in-school-choice-research/
- Holmes Erickson, H. (2017). How do parents choose schools, and what schools do they choose? A literature review of private school choice programs in the United States. Journal of School Choice, 11(4), 491–506. doi:10.1080/15582159.2017.1395618
- House Resolution 2673 Consolidated Appropriations Act (2004). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/house-bill/2673
- Howell, W. G., Wolf, P. J., Campbell, D. E., & Peterson, P. E. (2002). School vouchers and academic performance: Results from three randomized field trials. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(2), 191–217. doi: 10.1002/pam.10023
- Jin, H., Barnard, J., & Rubin, D. B. (2010). A modified general location model for noncompliance with missing data: Revisiting the New York City School Choice Scholarship Program using principal stratification. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(2), 154–173. doi:10.3102/1076998609346968
- Kelly, J. P., & Scafidi, B. (2013). More than scores: An analysis of why and how parents choose private school. Retrieved from EdChoice website: https://www.edchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/More-Than-Scores.pdf
- Kisida, B., Wolf, P. J., & Rhinesmith, E. (2015). Views from private schools: Attitudes about school choice programs in three states. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
- Lovenheim M. F., & Walsh, P. (2018). Does choice increase information? Evidence from online school search behavior. Economics of Education Review, 62, 91–103. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.11.002
- Lubienski, C. (2003). Innovation in education markets: Theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 395–443. doi:10.3102/00028312040002395
- Lubienski, C., & Lee, J. (2016). Competitive incentives and the education market: How charter schools define themselves in metropolitan Detroit. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(1), 64–80. doi:10.1080/0161956x.2016.1119582
- McShane, M. Q. (Ed.). (2015). New and better schools: The supply side of school choice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In M. W. Meyer & Associates (Eds.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78–109). San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass.
- Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Deal, T. E. (1992). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organization. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 45–70). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Mills, J. N., & Wolf, P. J. (2017). Vouchers in the bayou: The effects of the Louisiana Scholarship Program on student achievement after 2 years. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 464–484. doi:10.3102/0162373717693108
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Private School Universe Survey (PSS) [Data and documentation]. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pss/pssdata.asp
- Oplatka, I. (2004). The characteristics of school organization and the constraints on market ideology in education: An institutional view. Journal of Education Policy, 19(2), 143–161. doi:10.1080/0144341042000186318
- Pigou, A. C. (1932). The economics of welfare, 1920. London, UK: Macmillan.
- Renzulli, L. A., Barr, A. B., & Paino, M. (2015). Innovative education? A test of specialist mimicry or generalist assimilation in trends in charter school specialization over time. Sociology of Education, 88(1), 83–102. doi:10.1177/0038040714561866
- Rouse, C. E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 553–602. doi:10.1162/003355398555685
- Scott, W. R. (1987). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Shakeel, M. D., Anderson, K., & Wolf, P. (2016). The participant effects of private school vouchers across the globe: A meta-analytic and systematic review (EDRE Working Paper No. 2016-07). Retrieved from SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2777633
- Student Scholarships for Educational Excellence Act, RS 17: 4011 (2008). Retrieved from http://legis.la.gov/legis/Law.aspx?d=631046
- Stuit, D., & Doan, S. (2013). School choice regulations: Red tape or red herring. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
- Sude, Y., DeAngelis, C. A., & Wolf, P. J. (2018). Supplying choice: An analysis of school participation decisions in voucher programs in Washington, DC, Indiana, and Louisiana. Journal of School Choice, 12(1), 8–33. doi:10.1080/15582159.2017.1345232
- Swanson, E. (2017). Can we have it all? A review of the impacts of school choice on racial integration. Journal of School Choice, 11(4), 507–526. doi:10.1080/15582159.2017.1395644
- Trivitt, J. R., & Wolf, P. J. (2011). School choice and the branding of Catholic schools. Education Finance and Policy, 6(2), 202–245. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00032
- Tullock, G., Seldon, A., & Brady, G. L. (2002). Government failure: A primer in public choice. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
- Westwood, R., & Clegg, S. (2003). Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organization studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Wolf, P. J., Kisida, B., Gutmann, B., Puma, M., Eissa, N., & Rizzo, L. (2013). School vouchers and student outcomes: Experimental evidence from Washington, DC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(2), 246–270. doi:10.1002/pam.21691
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.