Inequality in top performance: an examination of cross-country variation in excellence gaps across different levels of parental socioeconomic status

References

• Bishop, J. H. (1997). The effect of national standards and curriculum-based exams on achievement. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 260–264. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2950928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, T., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2013). Educational systems and the trade-off between labor market allocation and equality of educational opportunity. Comparative Education Review, 57(2), 285–308. doi: 10.1086/669122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, T., Witschge, J., Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Dronkers, J. (2014). Curricular tracking and central examinations: Counterbalancing the impact of social background on student achievement in 36 countries. Social Forces, 92(4), 1545–1572. doi: 10.1093/sf/sou003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunello, G., & Checchi, D. (2007). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic Policy, 22(52), 781–861. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4502215
   Google Scholar
• Burroughs, N. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Excellence gaps. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (2nd ed., pp. 255–265). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domina, T. (2005). Leveling the home advantage: Assessing the effectiveness of parental involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education, 78(3), 233–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dronkers, J., & Avram, S. (2010). A cross-national analysis of the relations of school choice and effectiveness differences between private-dependent and public schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(2), 151–175. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2010.484977
   Google Scholar
• Dronkers, J., & Robert, P. (2008). Differences in scholastic achievement of public, private government-dependent, and private independent schools: A cross-national analysis. Educational Policy, 22(4), 541–577. doi: 10.1177/0895904807307065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T., & Woessmann, L. (2007). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Empirical Economics, 32(2–3), 433–464. doi: 10.1007/s00181-006-0087-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelade, G. A. (2008). IQ, cultural values, and the technological achievement of nations. Intelligence, 36(6), 711–718. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2011). The economics of international differences in educational achievement. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 89–200). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Hardesty, J., McWilliams, J., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Excellence gaps: What they are, why they are bad, and how smart contexts can address them … or make them worse. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 71–80. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2014.907646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, D. (2009). Age of selection counts: A cross-country analysis of educational institutions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(4), 343–366. doi: 10.1080/13803610903087011
   Google Scholar
• Kerckhoff, A. C. (2001). Education and social stratification processes in comparative perspective. Sociology of Education, 74, 3–18. doi: 10.2307/2673250
   Google Scholar
• Kraaykamp, G. (2003). Literary socialization and reading preferences. Effects of parents, the library, and the school. Poetics, 31(3–4), 235–257. doi: 10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00033-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. doi: 10.1177/1461444807080335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. N. (2005). Cross-national differences and accounting for social class inequalities in education. International Sociology, 20(4), 483–505. doi: 10.1177/0268580905058328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., & Sheehan, K. M. (1987). Marginal estimation procedures. In A. E. Beaton, Implementing the new design: The NAEP 1983–84 technical report (pp. 293–360). Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress, Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Montt, G. (2011). Cross-national differences in educational achievement inequality. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 49–68. doi: 10.1177/0038040710392717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Clarenbach, J. (2012). Unlocking emergent talent: Supporting high achievement of low-income, high-ability students. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Education at a glance 2006. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009a). Education at a glance 2009. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009b). PISA data analysis manual, SPSS (2nd ed.). Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Public and private schools: How management and funding relate to their socio-economic profile. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017a). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017b). PISA 2015 technical report. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pezdek, K., Berry, T., & Renno, P. A. (2002). Children’s mathematics achievement: The role of parents’ perceptions and their involvement in homework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 771–777. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, F. T. (2008). Persistent inequality in educational attainment and its institutional context. European Sociological Review, 24(5), 543–565. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Hardesty, J., & Burroughs, N. (2013). Talent on the sidelines: Excellence gaps and America’s persistent talent underclass. Storrs, CT: Center for Education Policy Analysis, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Roscigno, V. J., & Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W. (1999). Race, cultural capital, and educational resources: Persistent inequalities and achievement returns. Sociology of Education, 72(3), 158–178. doi: 10.2307/2673227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, D., Rutkowski, L., & Plucker, J. A. (2012). Trends in education excellence gaps: A 12-year international perspective via the multilevel model for change. High Ability Studies, 23(2), 143–166. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2012.735414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, S. B., & Epstein, J. L. (2005). Involvement counts: Family and community partnerships and mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(4), 196–207. doi: 10.3200/JOER.98.4.196-207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. doi: 10.1177/1529100611418056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, V. C., & Chan, R. M. (2009). Parental involvement in primary children’s homework in Hong Kong. School Community Journal, 19(2), 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2017). GDP per capita (current US$) [Data file]. Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&series=NY.GDP.PCAP.KD&country=#
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., & Jarvis, J. M. (2014). Case studies of success: Supporting academic success for students with high potential from ethnic minority and economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(3), 191–219. doi: 10.1177/0162353214540826
   Google Scholar
• Van Damme, J., & Bellens, K. (2017). Countries strive towards more quality and equity in education: Do they show success or failure? Evidence from TIMSS 2003 and 2011, for Grade 4. In M. Rosén, K. Yang Hansen, & U. Wolff (Eds.), Cognitive abilities and educational outcomes (pp. 127–148). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Mijs, J. J. B. (2010). Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: A comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 407–428. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hek, M. (2016). Gender inequality in educational attainment and reading performance: A contextual approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Radboud University, Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Wai, J., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Helping disadvantaged and spatially talented students fulfill their potential: Related and neglected national resources. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 122–128. doi: 10.1177/2372732215621310
   Google Scholar
• Woessmann, L. (2016). The importance of school systems: Evidence from international differences in student achievement. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 3–32. doi: 10.1257/jep.30.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar