References
- Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
- Coe, R. (2004). What kind of evidence does government need? Evaluation & Research in Education, 18(1–2), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/09500790408668305
- Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108–121. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00106
- Eacott, S. (2017). School leadership and the cult of the guru: The neo-Taylorism of Hattie. School Leadership & Management, 37(4), 413–426. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2017.1327428
- Greenhalgh, T., & Papoutsi, C. (2018). Studying complexity in health services research: Desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift. BMC Medicine, 16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1089-4
- Hammersley, M. (2005). Is the evidence-based practice movement doing more good than harm? Reflections on Iain Chalmers’ case for research-based policy making and practice. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 1(1), 85–100. doi: 10.1332/1744264052703203
- Marchal, B., Westhorp, G., Wong, G., Van Belle, S., Greenhalgh, T., Kegels, G., & Pawson, R. (2013). Realist RCTs of complex interventions – An oxymoron. Social Science & Medicine, 94, 124–128. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.025
- Sampson, R. J. (2010). Gold standard myths: Observations on the experimental turn in quantitative criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 489–500. doi: 10.1007/s10940-010-9117-3
- Shahjahan, R. A. (2011). Decolonizing the evidence-based education and policy movement: Revealing the colonial vestiges in educational policy, research, and neoliberal reform. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 181–206. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2010.508176
- Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.