Exploring the complex relationship between students’ reading skills and their performance in mathematics: a population-based study

References

• Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1403_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aikens, N. L., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajello, A. M., Caponera, E., & Palmerio, L. (2018). Italian students’ results in the PISA mathematics test: Does reading competence matter? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(3), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0385-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arán-Filippetti, V., & Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2012). A structural analysis of executive functions and socioeconomic status in school-age children: Cognitive factors as effect mediators. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 173(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2011.602374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avvisati, F. (2020). The measure of socio-economic status in PISA: A review and some suggested improvements. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 8, Article 8, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00086-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, K. (2012). Class in the classroom: The relationship between school resources and math performance among low socioeconomic status students in 19 rich countries. Education Economics, 20(5), 484–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2010.511848
   Google Scholar
• Bolondi, G., Branchetti, L., & Giberti, C. (2018). A quantitative methodology for analyzing the impact of the formulation of a mathematical item on students learning assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity, and social inequality: Changing prospects in Western society. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Branchetti, L., & Viale, M. (2015). Tra italiano e matematica: Il ruolo della formulazione sintattica nella comprensione del testo matematico [Between Italian and mathematics: The role of syntax in students’ text comprehension]. https://rsddm.dm.unibo.it/wp-publications/2015-branchetti-3/
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman-Wheldall, R. (2013). Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: The school years. Australian Journal of Education, 57(3), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944113495500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campodifiori, E., Figura E., Papini, M., & Ricci, R. (2010). Un indicatore di status socioeconomico-culturale degli allievi della quinta primaria in Italia [A socioeconomic-cultural index calculated for (primary) Grade 5 students in Italy] (INVALSI Working Paper No. 02/2010). https://www.invalsi.it/download/wp/wp02_Ricci.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caponera, E., Sestito, P., & Russo, P. M. (2016). The influence of reading literacy on mathematics and science achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(2), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.936998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascella, C. (2020). Intersectional effects of Socioeconomic status, phase and gender on Mathematics achievement. Educational Studies, 46(4), 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1614432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascella, C., & Giberti, C. (2020). Beyond text comprehension: Exploring items’ characteristics and their effect on foreign students’ disadvantage in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1836408
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York. R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED012275.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H., & Homer, M. (2020). Interpreting mathematics performance in PISA: Taking account of reading performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101566
   Google Scholar
• Doerschuk, P., Bahrim, C., Daniel, J., Kruger, J., Mann, J., & Martin, C. (2016). Closing the gaps and filling the STEM pipeline: A multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 682–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9622-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubow, E. F., Boxer, P., & Huesmann, L. R. (2009). Long-term effects of parents’ education on children’s educational and occupational success. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55(3), 224–249. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. (2010). Gender differences in educational outcomes: Study on the measures taken and the current situation in Europe. https://doi.org/10.2797/3598
   Google Scholar
• Falorsi, P. D., Falzetti, P., & Ricci, R. (2019). Le metodologie di campionamento e scomposizione della devianza nelle rilevazioni nazionali dell’INVALSI [Sampling strategies and methods to decompose deviance in INVALSI surveys]. FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Falorsi, S. (2008). Nota metodologica sulla strategia di campionamento [A methodological note about the (INVALSI) sampling strategy]. INVALSI. https://www.invalsi.it/download/INVALSI_indagine_SNV_strategia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Falzetti, P. (2013). Metodi di identificazione, analisi e trattamento del cheating [Method to detect, analyse, and deal with cheating]. https://www.invalsi.it/invalsi/ri/sis/documenti/022013/falzetti.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, W. J., Jr., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). School size, characteristics, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737013002189
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. (1989). Mathematics and the gender gap: A meta-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in mathematical tasks. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galdi, S., Cadinu, M., & Tomasetto, C. (2014). The roots of stereotype threat: When automatic associations disrupt girls’ math performance. Child Development, 85(1), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González de San Román, A., & de la Rica, S. (2016). Gender gaps in PISA test scores: The impact of social norms and the mother’s transmission of role attitudes. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 34(1), 79–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J. (2008). Longitudinal associations between reading and mathematics achievement. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640801982486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008, May 30). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320(5880), 11164–1165. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INVALSI. (2017). Rilevazioni nazionali degli apprendimenti 2016-17: Raporto risultati (Measurement of learning outcomes. Field study 2016-17]. https://invalsi-areaprove.cineca.it/docs/file/Rapporto_Prove_INVALSI_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• INVALSI. (2018). Quadro di Riferimento delle prove INVALSI di Italiano [The Italian framework for INVALSI tests to assess students’ reading literacy]. https://www.engheben.it/prof/materiali/invalsi/invalsi_seconda_superiore/2018-2019/QdR_ITALIANO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ireson, G. (2017). Gender achievement and social, political and economic equality: A European perspective. Educational Studies, 43(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1237868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimerson, S. R. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30(3), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2001.12086124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels, U. (2005). Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(3), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.1.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiray, S. A., Gok, B., & Bozkir, A. S. (2015). Identifying the factors affecting science and mathematics achievement using data mining methods. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 1(1), 28–48. https://www.jeseh.net/index.php/jeseh/article/view/4/64
   Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. (2015). The relationship between students’ math and reading ability and their mathematics, physics, and chemistry examination grades in secondary education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9534-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, S., & Fullarton, S. (2002). Classroom and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Australia and the United States using TIMSS. Australian Journal of Education, 46(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410204600205
   Google Scholar
• Larzelere, R. E., & Patterson, G. R. (1990). Parental management: Mediator of the effect of socioeconomic status on early delinquency. Criminology, 28(2), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01327.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legewie, J., & DiPrete, T. A. (2012). School context and the gender gap in educational achievement. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412440802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2010). Investigating gender differences in reading. Educational Review, 62(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911003637006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longobardi, S., Falzetti, P., & Pagliuca, M. M. (2018). Quis custiodet ipsos custodes? How to detect and correct teacher cheating in Italian student data. Statistical Methods & Applications, 27(3), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-018-0426-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucifora, C., & Tonello, M. (2015). Cheating and social interactions. Evidence from a randomized experiment in a national evaluation program. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G. N. (2008). Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and mathematics: Evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701565279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. A., Gallo, L. C., & Taylor, S. E. (2010). Are psychosocial factors mediators of socioeconomic status and health connections? A progress report and blueprint for the future. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186(1), 146–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05332.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinck, S., & Brese, F. (2019). Trends in gender gaps: Using 20 years of evidence from TIMSS. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 7(8), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0076-3
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & MacZuga, S. (2009). Risk factors for learning-related behavior problems at 24 months of age: Population-based estimates. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(3), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9279-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, T. C., Rodgers, W. M., & Fraser, S. N. (2012). Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic status, control beliefs and exercise behavior: A multiple mediator model. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-011-9327-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasser, F., & Birenbaum, M. (2005). Modeling mathematics achievement of Jewish and Arab eighth graders in Israel: The effects of learner-related variables. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(3), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500101108
   Google Scholar
• Nollenberger, N., Rodríguez-Planas, N., & Sevilla, A. (2016). The math gender gap: The role of culture. American Economic Review, 106(5), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264062658-en
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015a). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behaviour, confidence. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229945-en
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015b). Can the performance gap between immigrant and non-immigrant students be closed (PISA in Focus No. 53). https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrxqs8mv327-en
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume 1): Excellence and equity in education. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
   Google Scholar
• Pampaka, M., Williams, J., Hutcheson, G., Black, L., Davis, P., Hernandez-Martinez, P., & Wake, G. (2013). Measuring alternative learning outcomes: Dispositions to study in higher education. Journal of Applied Measurement, 14(2), 197–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Passolunghi, M. C., Vercelloni, B., & Schadee, H. (2007). The precursors of mathematics learning: Working memory, phonological ability and numerical competence. Cognitive Development, 22(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praet, M., Titeca, D., Ceulemans, A., & Desoete, A. (2013). Language in the prediction of arithmetics in kindergarten and grade 1. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purpura, D. J., Hume, L. E., Sims, D. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2011). Early literacy and early numeracy: The value of including early literacy skills in the prediction of numeracy development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(4), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintano, C., Castellano, R., & Longobardi, S. (2009). A fuzzy clustering approach to improve the accuracy of Italian student data: An experimental procedure to correct the impact of outliers on assessment test scores. Statistica & Applicazioni, 7(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1400/209647
   Google Scholar
• Radovic, D., Black, L., Williams, J., & Salas, C. E. (2018). Towards conceptual coherence in the research on mathematics learner identity: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9819-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W. J., & Goldenstein, H. (2017). A user ‘s guide to MLwiN (Version 3.01). Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/media/software/mlwin/downloads/manuals/3-01/manual-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and achievement tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., Valentino, R. A., Kalogrides, D., Shores, K. A., Greenberg, E. H. (2013). Patterns and trends in racial academic achievement gaps among states, 1999–2011. https://cepa.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/reardon%20et%20al%20state%20achievement%20gaps%20aug2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., Yun, J. T., & Kurlaender, M. (2006). Implications of income-based school assignment policies for racial school segregation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737028001049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2009). Student and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: International comparisons between Korea, Japan and the USA. School Psychology International, 30(5), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034309107070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2013). Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: Within- and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data. PLoS ONE, 8(3), Article e57988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2015). Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. Intelligence, 48, 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, S. (2014a). Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: Intersectionality and “getting it” for the white working class. Research Papers in Education, 29(2), 131–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2013.767370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, S. (2014b). School effects and ethnic, gender and socio-economic gaps in educational achievement at age 11. Oxford Review of Education, 40(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.891980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troncoso, P., Pampaka, M., & Olsen, W. (2016). Beyond traditional school value-added models: A multilevel analysis of complex school effects in Chile. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(3), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1084010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bergen, E., van Zuijen, T., Bishop, D., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Why are home literacy environment and children’s reading skills associated? What parental skills reveal. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ewijk, R., & Sleegers, P. (2009). Peer ethnicity and achievement: A meta-analysis into the compositional effect. SSRN, 3453. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1402651
   Google Scholar
• van Ewijk, R., & Sleegers, P. (2010). The effect of peer socioeconomic status on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukovic, R. K., & Lesaux, N. K. (2013). The relationship between linguistic skills and arithmetic knowledge. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. M., Zhang, B., & Surber, J. (2008). Using a multidimensional differential item functioning framework to determine if reading ability affects student performance in mathematics. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957340801926201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar