References
- Holm HA. Quality issues in continuing medical education. Br Med J. 1998;316:621–624.
- Forsetlund L, Bjorndal A, Rashidian A, et al. Continuing education meetings and workshops: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:CD003030.
- Kjaer NK, Steenstrup AP, Pedersen LB, et al. Continuous professional development for GPs: Experience from Denmark. Postgrad Med J. 2014;90:383–387.
- Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, et al. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Med Teach. 2008;30:124–145.
- Bellande BJ, Winicur ZM, Cox KM. Commentary: Urgently needed: A safe place for self-assessment on the path to maintaining competence and improving performance. Acad Med. 2010;85:16–18.
- Regehr G. The persistent myth of stability. On the chronic underestimation of the role of context in behavior. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:544–545.
- Kjaer NK. How postgraduate medical education can facilitate expertise development: A PhD project. Research Unit for General Practice. University of Southern Denmark; 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 31]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265165261_How_postgraduate_medical_education_can_facilitate_medical_expertise_development.
- Rasmussen MB, Dieckmann P, Barry Issenberg S, et al. Long-term intended and unintended experiences after advanced life support training. Resuscitation. 2013;84:373–377.
- Thomsen JN, Lassen J, Maagaard RR. [New specialty education for general practice. The Danish Society of General Practice]. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2004;166:1101. Danish.
- Steenstrup A. [Systematc CPD]. Danish Regions and the Organisation of Danish Practitionares. 2012 [cited 2016 Oct 31]. Available from: http://www.telemed.dk/nk/systematisk_efteruddannelse. Danish.
- Weick K. Sensemaking in organizations: Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.
- Cohen R, Amiel GE, Tann M, et al. Performance assessment of community-based physicians: Evaluating the reliability and validity of a tool for determining CME needs. Acad Med. 2002;77:1247–1254.
- Finlay K, McLaren S. Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners’ experiences of appraisal. Qual Prim Care. 2009;17:387–395.
- Colthart I, Cameron N, McKinstry B, et al. What do doctors really think about the relevance and impact of GP appraisal 3 years on? A survey of Scottish GPs. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58:82–87.
- Kjaer NK, Halling A, Pedersen LB. General practitioners’ preferences for future continuous professional development: Evidence from a Danish discrete choice experiment. Educ Prim Care. 2015;26:4–10.
- [The collective agreement—2014]. Danish Regions and the Organisation of Danish Practitioners 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 31]. Available from: http://www.laeger.dk/portal/page/portal/LAEGERDK/Laegerdk/P_L_O/Overenskomster. Danish.
- Fletcher AJ, Marchildon GP. Using the Delphi method for qualitative, participatory action research in health leadership. Int J Qual Methods. 2014;13:1–18.
- Schandorf E, Navntoft D, Kjaer N. [A new curriculum is on its way]. Practicus. 2011;205:20–21. Danish.
- Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR editors. Improving diagnosis in health care. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-37769-0 (pbk) [cited 2016 Oct 31]. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/read/21794/chapter/1.
- Nagel C, Lenton C. Serving the needs of our future population. Educ Prim Care. 2016;27:177–179.
- Finucane PM, Bourgeois-Law GA, Ineson SL, et al. A comparison of performance assessment programs for medical practitioners in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Acad Med. 2003;78:837–843.