4,600
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Opinion Papers

Digital technologies in primary care: Implications for patient care and future research

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 203-208 | Received 16 Aug 2021, Accepted 03 Mar 2022, Published online: 11 Jul 2022

References

  • Fadahunsi KP, Akinlua JT, O’Connor S, et al. Protocol for a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of information quality frameworks in eHealth. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e024722.
  • Chen CE, Harrington RA, Desai SA, et al. Characteristics of digital health studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(6):838–840.
  • Bhavnani SP, Narula J, Sengupta PP. Mobile technology and the digitization of healthcare. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(18):1428–1438.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). Global diffusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable. Report of the third global survey on eHealth. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
  • O’Donoghue J, Herbert J. Data management within mHealth environments: patient sensors, mobile devices, and databases. J Data and Information Quality. 2012;4(1):1–20.
  • van der Kleij RMJJ, Kasteleyn MJ, Meijer E, et al. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 1: Concepts, conditions and challenges. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25(4):179–189.
  • Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(8):1261–1267.
  • Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–1230.
  • Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, et al. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(2):121–126.
  • Neves AL, Freise L, Laranjo L, et al. Impact of providing patients access to electronic health records on quality and safety of health: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29(12):1019–1032.
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). Health Information Privacy Division O for CR (OCR). Individuals’ Right under HIPAA to Access their Health Information [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2021 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/access/index.html.
  • Sarkar U, Lyles C. Devil in the details: understanding the effects of providing electronic health record access to patients and families. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29(12):965–967.
  • Neves AL, Smalley KR, Freise L, et al. Sharing electronic health records with patients: who is using the Care Information Exchange portal? A cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(11):e23481. https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/23481/accepted
  • Vuik SI, Mayer E, Darzi A. A quantitative evidence base for population health: applying utilization-based cluster analysis to segment a patient population. Popul Health Metr. 2016;14:44.
  • Fahey T. Applying the results of clinical trials to patients to general practice: perceived problems, strengths, assumptions, and challenges for the future. Br J Gen Pract. 1998;48(429):1173–1178.
  • de Lusignan S, Crawford L. Munro N. Creating and using real-world evidence to answer questions about clinical effectiveness. J Innov Health Inform. 2015;22:368–373.
  • Lounsbury O, Roberts L, Goodman JR, et al. Opening a "Can of Worms" to explore the public’s hopes and fears about health care data sharing: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(2):e22744.
  • Boers SN, Jongsma KR, Lucivero F, et al. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 2: exploring the ethical implications of its application in primary care practice. Eur J Gen Pract. 2020;26(1):26–32.
  • McGrail KM, Ahuja MA, Leaver CA. Virtual visits and patient-centered care: results of a 434 patient survey and observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e177.
  • Fatehi F, Menon A, Bird D. Diabetes care in the digital era: a synoptic overview. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(7):38.
  • Greenhalgh T, Vijayaraghavan S, Wherton J, et al. Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e009388.
  • National Health Service (NHS) England and British Medical Association. Investment and evolution: a five-year framework for GP contract reform to implement the NHS long term plan. NHS; 2019. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/gp-contract-2019.pdf.
  • Digital Health and Care Scotland. Scotland’s digital health and care strategy: enabling, connecting and empowering. Digital Health and Care Scotland, 2018. [cited 2021 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-digital-health-care-strategy-enabling-connecting-empowering.
  • US Department of Veterans Affairs. Department of Veterans Affairs FY 2018-2024 Strategic Plan. 2019. [cited 2021 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.va.gov/oei/docs/VA2018-2024strategicPlan.pdf.
  • National Digital Health Strategy and Framework for Action. Australian Digital Health Agency. 2021. [cited 2021 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/about-us/national-digital-health-strategy-and-framework-for-action.
  • Van Galen LS, Car J. Telephone consultations. BMJ. 2018;360:k1047.
  • Tossaint-Schoenmakers R, Versluis A, Chavannes N, et al. The challenge of integrating eHealth into health care: systematic literature review of the Donabedian Model of Structure, Process, and Outcome. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e27180.
  • Neves A, Lygidakis H, Fontana G. The technology legacy of COVID-19 in primary care. BJGP Life. 2020 Apr 15. [cited 2021 Aug 13]. Available from: https://bjgplife.com/2020/04/15/the-technology-legacy-of-covid-19-in-primary-care.
  • Van Hattem NE, Silven AV, Bonten TN, et al. COVID-19’s impact on the future of digital health technology in primary care. Fam Pract. 2021;38(6):845–847.
  • Neves A, Li E, Serafini A, et al. Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on the adoption of virtual care in general practice in 20 countries (inSIGHT): protocol and rationale study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021;10(8):e30099. PMID: 34292867; PMCID: PMC8396553.
  • Burgers JS, Wittenberg J, Keuken DG, et al. Development of a research agenda for general practice based on knowledge gaps identified in Dutch guidelines and input from 48 stakeholders. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25(1):19–24.
  • Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001. PMID: 25057539.
  • Chang JJE, Yuanhong Lai A, Gupta A, et al. Rapid transition to telehealth and the digital divide: implications for primary care access and equity in a post-COVID era. Milbank Q. 2021;99(2):340–368.
  • Kim H, Xie B. Health literacy in the eHealth era: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(6):1073–1082.
  • Versluis A, Van Luenen S, Meijer E, et al. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 4: Addressing the challenges of implementation. Eur J Gen Pract. 2020;26(1):140–145.
  • Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3(1):160018.
  • Krist AH, Phillips R, Leykum L, et al. Digital health needs for implementing high-quality primary care: recommendations from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(12):2738–2742.