Publication Cover
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
A Journal on Normal and Dysfunctional Development
Volume 22, 2015 - Issue 1
157
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Age affects the adjustment of cognitive control after a conflict: evidence from the bivalency effect

&
Pages 72-94 | Received 29 Aug 2013, Accepted 24 Jan 2014, Published online: 24 Feb 2014

References

  • Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphrey, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273–296). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. S. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Andrés, P., Guerrini, C., Phillips, L. H., & Perfect, T. J. (2008). Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 101–123. doi:10.1080/87565640701884212
  • Borella, E., Delaloye, C., Lecerf, T., Renaud, O., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2009). Do age differences between young and older adults in inhibitory tasks depend on the degree of activation of information? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 445–472. doi:10.1080/09541440802613997
  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
  • Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403–416. doi:10.3758/BF03200930
  • Craik, F. I. M., & Salthouse, T. (2008). Handbook of aging and cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 380–390. doi:10.3758/CABN.7.4.380
  • Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Manzi, M., Cochran, B., & Baker, M. (2000). Prospective memory and aging: Forgetting intentions over short delays. Psychology and Aging, 15, 671–683. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.4.671
  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  • Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
  • Grundy, J. G., Benarroch, M. F. F., Woodward, T. S., Metzak, P. D., Whitman, J. C., & Shedden, J. M. (2013). The bivalency effect in task switching: Event-related potentials. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 999–1012. doi:10.1002/hbm.21488
  • Hartley, A. A. (1993). Evidence for the selective preservation of spatial selective attention in old age. Psychology and Aging, 8, 371–379. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.8.3.371
  • Hasher, L., Zacks, R., & May, C. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653–675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
  • Hsieh, S., Liang, Y.-C., & Tsai, Y.-C. (2012). Do age-related changes contribute to the flanker effect? Clinical Neurophysiology, 123, 960–972. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2011.09.013
  • Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.9.4.491
  • Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15, 126–147. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.126
  • Lehrl, S., Merz, J., Burkhard, G., & Fischer, B. (1991). MWT-A: Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest. Parallelform zum MWT-B. Erlangen: Perimed.
  • Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166–174. doi:10.3758/BF03197535
  • Lowe, D. G., & Mitterer, J. O. (1982). Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 36, 684–700. doi:10.1037/h0080661
  • Ludwig, C., Borella, E., Tettamanti, M., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2010). Adult age differences in the Color Stroop Test: A comparison between an item-by-item and a blocked version. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 51, 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2009.09.040
  • Mayas, J., Fuentes, L. J., & Ballesteros, S. (2012). Stroop interference and negative priming (NP) suppression in normal aging. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 54, 333–338. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2010.12.012
  • McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Stout, A. C., & Morgan, Z. (2003). Aging and maintaining intentions over delays: Do it or lose it. Psychology and Aging, 18, 823–835. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.823
  • Meier, B., & Rey-Mermet, A. (2012a). Beyond feature binding: Interference from episodic context binding creates the bivalency effect in task-switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 386–394. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00386
  • Meier, B., & Rey-Mermet, A. (2012b). Beyond monitoring: After-effects of responding to prospective memory targets. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1644–1653. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.09.003
  • Meier, B., Rey-Mermet, A., Rothen, N., & Graf, P. (2013). Recognition memory across the lifespan: The impact of word frequency and study-test interval on estimates of familiarity and recollection. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 787. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00787
  • Meier, B., Rey-Mermet, A., Woodward, T. S., Müri, R., & Gutbrod, K. (2013). Episodic context binding in task switching: Evidence from amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 51, 886–892. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.025
  • Meier, B., Woodward, T. S., Rey-Mermet, A., & Graf, P. (2009). The bivalency effect in task switching: General and enduring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 63, 201–210. doi:10.1037/a0014311
  • Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
  • Metzak, P. D., Meier, B., Graf, P., & Woodward, T. S. (2013). More than a surprise: The bivalency effect in task switching. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 833–842. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.832196
  • Mutter, S. A., Naylor, J. C., & Patterson, E. R. (2005). The effects of age and task context on Stroop task performance. Memory & Cognition, 33, 514–530. doi:10.3758/BF03193068
  • Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2011). Conflict and error adaptation in the Simon task. Acta Psychologica, 136, 212–216. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.006
  • Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition, 111, 275–279. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.002
  • Nùñ ez Castellar, E., Kühn, S., Fias, W., & Notebaert, W. (2010). Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines post-error slowing: ERP support. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 270–278. doi:10.3758/CABN.10.2.270
  • Persad, C. C., Abeles, N., Zacks, R. T., & Denburg, N. L. (2002). Inhibitory changes after age 60 and their relationship to measures of attention and memory. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, 223–232. doi:10.1093/geronb/57.3.P223
  • Puccioni, O., & Vallesi, A. (2012). Conflict resolution and adaptation in normal aging: The role of verbal intelligence and cognitive reserve. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1018–1026. doi:10.1037/a0029106
  • Rabbitt, P., & Vyas, S. M. (1980). Selective anticipation for events in old age. Journal of Gerontology, 35, 913–919. doi:10.1093/geronj/35.6.913
  • Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
  • Regard, M. (1981). Cognitive rigidity and flexibility: A neuropsychological study (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Victoria: University of Victoria.
  • Rey-Mermet, A., Koenig, T., & Meier, B. (2013). The bivalency effect represents an interference-triggered adjustment of cognitive control: An ERP study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 575–583. doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0160–z
  • Rey-Mermet, A., & Meier, B. (2012a). The bivalency effect: Adjustment of cognitive control without response set priming. Psychological Research, 76, 50–59. doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0322-y
  • Rey-Mermet, A., & Meier, B. (2012b). The bivalency effect: Evidence for flexible adjustment of cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 213–221. doi:10.1037/a0026024
  • Rey-Mermet, A., & Meier, B. (2013). An orienting response is not enough: Bivalency not infrequency causes the bivalency effect. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9, 146–155. doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0142-9
  • Rey-Mermet, A., & Meier, B. (2014). More conflict does not trigger more adjustment of cognitive control for subsequent events: A study of the bivalency effect. Acta Psychologica, 145, 111–117. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.005
  • Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
  • Rush, B. K., Barch, D. M., & Braver, T. S. (2006). Accounting for cognitive aging: Context processing, inhibition or processing speed? Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13, 588–610. doi:10.1080/13825580600680703
  • Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
  • Salthouse, T. A., & Babcock, R. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 763–776. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763
  • Tewes, U. (1991). Hamburg-Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene, Revision 1991, HAWIE-R. Bern: Huber.
  • Trewartha, K. M., Penhune, V. B., & Li, K. Z. H. (2011). Movement kinematics of prepotent response suppression in aging during conflict adaptation. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66B, 185–194. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbq090
  • Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Verleger, R. (2002). Aging and the Simon task. Psychophysiology, 39, 100–110. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3910100
  • Verhaeghen, P. (2011). Aging and executive control: Reports of a demise greatly exaggerated. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 174–180. doi:10.1177/0963721411408772
  • Verhaeghen, P., & Cerella, J. (2002). Aging, executive control, and attention: A review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 849–857. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00071-4
  • Verhaeghen, P., & De Meersman, L. (1998). Aging and the Stroop effect: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 13, 120–126. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.120
  • Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., & Cerella, J. (2003). Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 443–460. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.443
  • Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
  • West, R. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 272–292. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.272
  • West, R., & Alain, C. (2000). Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. Psychophysiology, 37, 179–189. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720179
  • West, R., & Baylis, G. C. (1998). Effects of increased response dominance and contextual disintegration on the Stroop interference effect in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 13, 206–217. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.2.206
  • West, R., & Moore, K. (2005). Adjustments of cognitive control in younger and older adults. Cortex, 41, 570–581. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70197-7
  • Woodward, T. S., Meier, B., Tipper, C., & Graf, P. (2003). Bivalency is costly: Bivalent stimuli elicit cautious responding. Experimental Psychology, 50, 233–238. doi:10.1026//1618-3169.50.4.233
  • Woodward, T. S., Metzak, P. D., Meier, B., & Holroyd, C. B. (2008). Anterior cingulate cortex signals the requirement to break inertia when switching tasks: A study of the bivalency effect. NeuroImage, 40, 1311–1318. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.049
  • Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs”. Psychological Research, 63, 212–233. doi:10.1007/s004269900003
  • Yoshizaki, K., Kuratomi, K., Kimura, Y., & Kato, K. (2013). Age-related change of location-based visual selectivity depending on conflict frequency. Japanese Psychological Research, 55, 72–83. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00534.x
  • Zimmermann, T., & Meier, B. (2006). The rise and decline of prospective memory performance across the lifespan. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2040–2046. doi:10.1080/17470210600917835
  • Zimmermann, T. D., & Meier, B. (2010). The effect of implementation intentions on prospective memory performance across the lifespan. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 645–658. doi:10.1002/acp.1576

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.