The effects of thematic relations on picture naming abilities across the lifespan

References

• Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2007). When bees hamper the production of honey: Lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 604–614. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 713–734. doi:10.1080/01690960802597250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F. X., Segui, J., & Ferrand, L. (2000). Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A, 741–764. doi:10.1080/713755907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., & James, L. E. (2000). Theoretical approaches to language and aging. In T. J. Perfect & E. A. Maylor (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 204-237). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208. doi:10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Alario, F.-X., & Caramazza, A. (2005). On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture–word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 125–131. doi:10.3758/BF03196357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 318–344. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 111–117. doi:10.3758/BF03196474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zubicaray, G. I., Hansen, S., & McMahon, K. L. (2013). Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 131–142. doi:10.1037/a0028717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 878–891. doi:10.1037/a0019128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes, Z., Golonka, S., & Jones, L. L. (2011). Thematic thinking: The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations. In B. Ross (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 250–294). Burlington: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rates and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799.
   Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Schrim, W., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 249–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16, 400–410. doi:10.3758/BF03214220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, E. L., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). Thematic relations in adults’ concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 3–28. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 503–535. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., & Navarrete, E. (2014). The CRITICAL DIFFERENCE in models of speech production: A response to Roelofs and Piai. Cortex, 52, 123–127. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 547–559. doi:10.3758/BF03192726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlhaus, J., Heim, S., Sachs, O., Schneider, F., Habel, U., & Sass, K. (2013). Is the motor or the garage more important to the car? The difference between semantic associations in single word and sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 37–49. doi:10.1007/s10936-012-9209-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., & Mahon, B. Z. (2013). A rose by any other name is still a rose: A re-interpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 701–716. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.682071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 402–407. doi:10.3758/BF03195588
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460–499. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., Piai, V., & Schriefers, H. (2013). Context effects and selective attention in picture naming and word reading: Competition versus response exclusion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 655–671. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.615663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailor, K., & Brooks, P. J. (2014). Do part-whole relations produce facilitation in the picture-word interference task? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1768–1785. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.870589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailor, K., Brooks, P. J., Bruening, P. R., Seiger-Gardner, L., & Guterman, M. (2009). Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture-word interference task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 789–801. doi:10.1080/17470210802254383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass, K., Heim, S., Sachs, O., Theede, K., Muehlhaus, J., Krach, S., & Kircher, T. (2010). Why the leash constrains the dog: Investigating the impact of semantic associations and distractor modality on sentence production. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 70, 435–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafto, M. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2014). Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science, 346, 583–587. doi:10.1126/science.1254404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686–698. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive model of language production. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (pp. 143-186). London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2011). Riding the lexical speedway: A critical review on the time course of lexical selection in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. K., & Burke, D. M. (2002). Asymmetric aging effects on semantic and phonological processes: Naming in the picture-word interference task. Psychology and Aging, 17, 662–676. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar