Publication Cover
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
A Journal on Normal and Dysfunctional Development
Volume 25, 2018 - Issue 4
266
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

How scenes containing visual errors affect speech fluency in young and older adults

, &
Pages 520-534 | Received 14 Oct 2016, Accepted 27 May 2017, Published online: 06 Jun 2017

References

  • Bock, J. K. (1986). Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 575–586.
  • Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44, 123–147. doi:10.1177/00238309010440020101
  • Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 542–579. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90026-G
  • Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2008). Language and aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 373–443). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Castro, N., & James, L. E. (2014). Differences between young and older adults’ spoken language production in descriptions of negative versus neutral pictures. Aging, Neuropsychology, And Cognition, 21, 222–238. doi:10.1080/13825585.2013.804902
  • Clark, H. H. (2002). Speaking in time. Speech Communication, 36, 5–13. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(01)00022-X
  • Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3
  • Cooper, P. V. (1990). Discourse production and normal aging: Performance on oral picture description tasks. Journal of Gerontology, 45, 210–214. doi:10.1093/geronj/45.5.P210
  • Corley, M., & Stewart, O. W. (2008). Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech: The meaning of um. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 589–602. doi:10.1111/lnco.2008.2.issue-4
  • Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
  • Engelhardt, P. E., Corley, M., Nigg, J. T., & Ferreira, F. (2010). The role of inhibition in the production of disfluencies. Memory & Cognition, 38, 617–628. doi:10.3758/MC.38.5.617
  • Engelhardt, P. E., Nigg, J. T., & Ferreira, F. (2013). Is the fluency of language outputs related to individual differences in intelligence and executive function? Acta Psychologica, 144, 424–432. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.08.002
  • Finlayson, I. R., & Corley, M. (2012). Disfluency in dialogue: An intentional signal from the speaker? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 921–928. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0279-x
  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  • Fox Tree, J. E. (2001). Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29, 320–326. doi:10.3758/BF03194926
  • Fraundorf, S. H., & Watson, D. G. (2014). Alice’s adventures in um-derland: Psycholinguistic sources of variation in disfluency production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 1083–1096.
  • Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27–52. doi:10.2307/412187
  • Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 133–177). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Gordon, J. K., & Kindred, N. K. (2011). Word retrieval in ageing: An exploration of the task constraint hypothesis. Aphasiology, 25, 774–788. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.539699
  • Hartsuiker, R. J., & Notebaert, L. (2010). Lexical access problems lead to disfluencies in speech. Experimental Psychology, 57, 169–177. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000021
  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Heine, M. K., Ober, B. A., & Shenaut, G. K. (1999). Naturally occurring and experimentally induced tip-of-the-tongue experiences in three adult age groups. Psychology and Aging, 14, 445–457. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.445
  • Horton, W. S., Spieler, D. H., & Shriberg, E. (2010). A corpus analysis of patterns of age-related change in conversational speech. Psychology and Aging, 25, 708–713. doi:10.1037/a0019424
  • James, L. E., & Burke, D. M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1378–1391.
  • James, L. E., & Kooy, T. M. (2011). Aging and the detection of visual errors in scenes. Journal of Aging Research, Article ID 984694, 6. doi:10.4061/2011/984694
  • James, L. E., & MacKay, D. G. (2007). New age-linked asymmetries: Aging and the processing of familiar versus novel language on the input versus output side. Psychology and Aging, 22, 94–103. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.94
  • Kasl, S. V., & Mahl, G. F. (1969). The relationship of disturbances and hesitations in spontaneous speech to anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 425–433. doi:10.1037/h0021918
  • Kavé, G., & Mashal, N. (2012). Age-related differences in word retrieval but not in meaning generation. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 515–529. doi:10.1080/13825585.2011.638975
  • Kavé, G., Samuel-Enoch, K., & Adiv, S. (2009). The association between age and the frequency of nouns selected for production. Psychology and Aging, 24, 17–27. doi:10.1037/a0014579
  • Kemper, S., Herman, R., & Lian, C. (2003). Age differences in sentence production. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, 260–268. doi:10.1093/geronb/58.5.P260
  • Korko, M., & Williams, S. A. (2017). Inhibitory control and the speech patterns of second language users. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 43–72. doi:10.1111/bjop.2017.108.issue-1
  • Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a “new view”. In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), The place of inhibition in cognition (pp. 145–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • MacKay, D. G. (1970). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia, 8, 323–350. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(70)90078-3
  • MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York, NY: Springer.
  • MacKay, D. G., & Abrams, L. (1996). Language, memory, and aging: Distributed deficits and the structure of new-versus-old connections. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed., pp. 251–265). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • MacKay, D. G., & Burke, D. M. (1990). Cognition and aging: A theory of new learning and the use of old connections. In T. M. Hess (Ed.), Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization (pp. 213–263). North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
  • MacKay, D. G., & James, L. E. (2001). The binding problem for syntax, semantics, and prosody: H.M.’s selective sentence-reading deficits under the theoretical-syndrome approach. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 419–460. doi:10.1080/01690960042000102
  • MacKay, D. G., & James, L. E. (2009). Visual cognition in amnesic H.M.: Selective deficits on the What’s-Wrong-Here and Hidden-Figure tasks. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31, 769–789. doi:10.1080/13803390802502606
  • Maclay, H., & Osgood, C. E. (1959). Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15, 19–44. doi:10.1080/00437956.1959.11659682
  • Mortensen, L., Meyer, A. S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Age-related effects on speech production: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 238–290. doi:10.1080/01690960444000278
  • Oberle, S., & James, L. E. (2013). Semantically- and phonologically-related primes improve name retrieval in young and older adults. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1378–1393. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.685481
  • Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Vesneski, M., & Jones, D. W. R. (2000). Aging and word-finding: A comparison of spontaneous and constrained naming tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 479–493.
  • Shewan, C. M., & Henderson, V. L. (1988). Analysis of spontaneous language in the older normal population. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 139–154. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(88)90002-0
  • Spieler, D. H., & Griffin, Z. M. (2006). The influence of age on the time course of word preparation in multiword utterances. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 291–321. doi:10.1080/01690960400002133
  • Taylor, J. K., & Burke, D. M. (2002). Asymmetric aging effects on semantic and phonological processes: Naming in the picture-word interference task. Psychology and Aging, 17, 662–676. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.662
  • Thornton, R., & Light, L. L. (2006). Language comprehension and production in normal aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (6th ed., pp. 261–287). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.