Event Segmentation Enhances Older Adults’ Reactive Cognitive Control Bias

References

• Aisenberg, D., Cohen, N., Pick, H., Tressman, I., Rappaport, M., Shenberg, T., & Henik, A. (2015). Social priming improves cognitive control in elderly adults–evidence from the Simon task. PloS one, 10(1), e0117151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Keys, B. A., Carter, C. S., Cohen, J. D., Kaye, J. A., Janowsky, J. S., Taylor, S. F., Yesavage, J. A., Mumenthaler, M. S., Jagust, W. J., & Reed, B. R. (2001). Context processing in older adults: Evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 746–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver, T. S., Paxton, J. L., Locke, H. S., & Barch, D. M. (2009). Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(18), 7351–7356. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808187106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver, T. S., Satpute, A. B., Rush, B. K., Racine, C. A., & Barch, D. M. (2005). Context processing and context maintenance in healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Psychology and Aging, 20(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugg, J. M. (2014). Evidence for the sparing of reactive cognitive control with age. Psychology and Aging, 29(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlos, V. (2018). The influence of control strategy on event segmentation [Master‘s Thesis, California State University - San Bernardino]. CSUSB ScholarWorks . https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/623
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. D., Barch, D. M., Carter, C., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1999). Context-processing deficits in schizophrenia: Converging evidence from three theoretically motivated cognitive tasks. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.108.1.120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardenne, K., Eshel, N., Luka, J., Lenartowicz, A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2012). Role of prefrontal cortex and the midbrain dopamine system in working memory updating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(49), 19900–19909. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116727109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forstmann, B. U., Tittgemeyer, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Derrfuss, J., Imperati, D., & Brown, S. (2011). The speed-accuracy tradeoff in the elderly brain: A structural model-based approach. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(47), 17242–17249. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0309-11.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonthier, C., Macnamara, B. N., Chow, M., Conway, A. R. A., & Braver, T. S. (2016). Inducing proactive control shifts in the AX-CPT. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haarmann, H. J., Ashling, G. E., Davelaar, E. J., & Usher, M. (2005). Age-related declines in context maintenance and semantic short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVII, Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application (pp. 653–675). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, J., & Helton, W. S. (2014). Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony. Acta Psychologica, 153, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowich, J. R., & Cavanagh, J. F. (2018). Delay knowledge and trial set count modulate use of proactive versus reactive control: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(4), 1249–1268. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1502-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzman, R., Brown, T., Fuld, P., Schecter, R., & Schimmel, H. (1983). Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140(6), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.140.6.734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manard, M., François, S., Phillips, C., Salmon, E., & Collette, F. (2014). Age-related decline in cognitive control: The role of fluid intelligence and processing speed. BMC Neuroscience, 15(7), 602–618. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-15-7
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, J. L., Barch, D. M., Racine, C. A., & Braver, T. S. (2008). Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging. Cerebral Cortex, 18(5), 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton J. L., Barch D. M., Storandt M. and Braver T. S. (2006). Effects of environmental support and strategy training on older adults' use of context. Psychology and Aging, 21(3) 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettijohn, K. A., Thompson, A. N., Tamplin, A. K., Krawietz, S. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (2016). Event boundaries and memory improvement. Cognition, 148, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A. (2012). Across the Event Horizon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412451274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2000). Functionality and spatial relations in memory and language. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 987–992. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky G. A. & Zacks R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(5), 940–953. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2014). Event cognition. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radvansky G. A. & Zacks J. M. (2017). Event boundaries in memory and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, L. (2005). Age and inhibition: The retrieval of situation models. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 60(5), 276–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.5.P276
   Google Scholar
• Redick, T. S. (2014). Cognitive control in context: Working memory capacity and proactive control. Acta Psychologica, 145, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, J. F., Radvansky, G. A., Lorsbach, T. C., & Armendarez, J. J. (2015). Event structure and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1374–1387. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt H., Kray J. and Ferdinand N. K. (2017). Does the Effort of Processing Potential Incentives Influence the Adaption of Context Updating in Older Adults?. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gerven, P. W., Hurks, P. P., Bovend’Eerdt, T. J., & Adam, J. J. (2016). Switch hands! Mapping proactive and reactive cognitive control across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 52(6), 960–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1196–1207. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1037//00332909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar