14
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Serial and strategic memory processes in younger and older adults

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 15 Jan 2024, Accepted 18 Jun 2024, Published online: 23 Jun 2024

References

  • Allen, R. J., Atkinson, A. L., & Nicholls, L. A. B. (2021). Strategic prioritisation enhances young and older adults’ visual feature binding in working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(2), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820960712
  • Ariel, R., Al-Harthy, I. S., Was, C. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18(5), 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0128-3
  • Ariel, R., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study? Memory & Cognition, 41(3), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0267-4
  • Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015928
  • Ariel, R., Price, J., & Hertzog, C. (2015). Age-related associative memory deficits in value-based remembering: The contribution of agenda-based regulation and strategy use. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039818
  • Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014
  • Bäuml, K. (1998). Strong items get suppressed, weak items do not: The role of item strength in output interference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208822
  • Campbell, K. L., Lustig, C., & Hasher, L. (2020). Aging and inhibition: Introduction to the special issue. Psychology and Aging, 35(5), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000564
  • Cansino, S., Guzzon, D., Martinelli, M., Barollo, M., & Casco, C. (2011). Effects of aging on interference control in selective attention and working memory. Memory & Cognition, 39(8), 1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0109-9
  • Castel, A. D. (2008). The adaptive and strategic use of memory by older adults: Evaluative processing and value-directed remembering. In A. S. Benjamin & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 48, pp. 225–270). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(07)48006-9
  • Castel, A. D. (2024). Memory selectivity in older age. Current Opinion in Psychology, 55, 101744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101744
  • Castel, A. D., Benjamin, A. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Watkins, M. J. (2002). The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall. Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 1078–1085. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194325
  • Chandler, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2019). Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond mechanical turk. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2022–2038. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7
  • Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (1995). Reading habits and line bisection: A developmental approach. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00018-6
  • Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (2000). Reading habits influence aesthetic preference. Cognitive Brain Research, 10(1–2), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00021-5
  • Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011a). The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023064
  • Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011b). Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 54, 103–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00004-8
  • Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195868
  • Durgin, F. H., Doyle, E., & Egan, L. (2008). Upper-left gaze bias reveals competing search strategies in a reverse stroop task. Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.007
  • Eich, T. S., & Castel, A. D. (2016). The cognitive control of emotional versus value-based information in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(5), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000106
  • Elliott, B. L., McClure, S. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2020). Individual differences in value-directed remembering. Cognition, 201, 104275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104275
  • Eviator, Z. (1995). Reading direction and attention: Effects on lateralized ignoring. Brain and Cognition, 29(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1995.1273
  • Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2008). Empirical and theoretical limits on lag recency in free recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1236–1250. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1236
  • Guo, K., Meints, K., Hall, C., Hall, S., & Mills, D. (2009). Left gaze bias in humans, rhesus monkeys and domestic dogs. Animal Cognition, 12(3), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0199-3
  • Halamish, V., & Stern, P. (2022). Motivation-based selective encoding and retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 50(4), 736–750. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01238-2
  • Hargis, M. B., & Castel, A. D. (2018a). Improving medication understanding and adherence using principles of memory and metacognition. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218781643
  • Hargis, M. B., & Castel, A. D. (2018b). Younger and older adults’ associative memory for medication interactions of varying severity. Memory, 26(8), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1441423
  • Hargis, M. B., & Castel, A. D. (2019). Knowing what others know: Younger and older adults’ perspective-taking and memory for medication information. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.09.004
  • Hartman, M., & Hasher, L. (1991). Aging and suppression: Memory for previously relevant information. Psychology and Aging, 6(4), 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.6.4.587
  • Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E. R., Zacks, R. T., & Rypma, B. (1991). Age and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.1.163
  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22, 193–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9
  • Hayes, M. G., Kelly, A. J., & Smith, A. D. (2013). Working memory and the strategic control of attention in older and younger adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(2), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs057
  • Hennessee, J. P., Patterson, T. K., Castel, A. D., & Knowlton, B. J. (2019). Forget me not: Encoding processes in value-directed remembering. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.02.001
  • Hess, T. M. (2005). Memory and aging in context. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.383
  • Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.923
  • Ichien, N., Stamenković, D., Whatley, M. C., Castel, A. D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2024). Advancing with age: Older adults excel in comprehension of novel metaphors. Psychology and Aging.
  • Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.283
  • Kahana, M. J. (1996). Associative retrieval processes in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 24(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197276
  • Kazandjian, S., & Chokron, S. (2008). Paying attention to reading direction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 965–965. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2456-c1
  • Keenan, V. (1972). Effects of Hebrew and English letters on children’s perceptual set. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(72)90008-2
  • Knowlton, B. J., & Castel, A. D. (2022). Memory and reward-based learning: A value-directed remembering perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032921-050951
  • Kwak, Y., & Huettel, S. (2018). The order of information processing alters economic gain-loss framing effects. Acta Psychologica, 182, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.013
  • Loaiza, V. M., & Souza, A. S. (2019). An age-related deficit in preserving the benefits of attention in working memory. Psychology and Aging, 34(2), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000326
  • Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, J., Ly, A., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Wild, A., Knight, P., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2019). JASP: Graphical statistical software for common statistical designs. Journal of Statistical Software, 88(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v088.i02
  • Lustig, C., & Flegal, K. (2008). Age differences in memory: Demands on cognitive control and association processes. Advances in Psychology, 139, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)10012-7
  • Madan, C. R., Zwaan, R., & Madan, C. (2017). Motivated cognition: Effects of reward, emotion, and other motivational factors across a variety of cognitive domains. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.111
  • Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005
  • McDowd, J. M. (1997). Inhibition in attention and aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52(6), 265–P273. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/52B.6.P265
  • McGillivray, S., & Castel, A. D. (2011). Betting on memory leads to metacognitive improvement in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26, 137–142.
  • Middlebrooks, C. D., & Castel, A. D. (2018). Self-regulated learning of important information under sequential and simultaneous encoding conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(5), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000480
  • Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2021). Metamemory that matters: Judgments of importance can engage responsible remembering. Memory, 29(3), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1887895
  • Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2022a). Differential effects of proactive and retroactive interference in value-directed remembering for younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 37(7), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000707
  • Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2022b). The role of attention and aging in the retrieval dynamics of value-directed remembering. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(5), 954–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211046612
  • Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2023). Age-related differences in overcoming interference when selectively remembering important information. Experimental Aging Research, 50(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2023.2176629
  • Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2024). Knowing more than we know: Metacognition, semantic fluency, and originality in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 31(2), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2149691
  • Murphy, D. H., Hoover, K. M., Castel, A. D., & Knowlton, B. J. (2024). Memory and automatic processing of valuable information in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2024.2360226
  • Murphy, D. H., Schwartz, S. T., & Castel, A. D. (2022). Serial and strategic memory processes in goal-directed selective remembering. Cognition, 225, 105178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105178
  • Murphy, D. H., Schwartz, S. T., & Castel, A. D. (2023). Value-directed retrieval: The effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval on memory selectivity and retrieval dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 50, 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001264
  • Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1170–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1170
  • Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Israeli, Z., & Gabay, S. (2010). Is the future the right time? Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000036
  • Park, D. C., & Festini, S. B. (2017). Theories of memory and aging: A look at the past and a glimpse of the future. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 72(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw066
  • Rey-Mermet, A., & Gade, M. (2018). Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1695–1716. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1384-7
  • Rhodes, M. G., & Kelley, C. M. (2005). Executive processes, memory accuracy, and memory monitoring: An aging and individual difference analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.014
  • Robison, M. K., & Unsworth, N. (2017). Working memory capacity, strategic allocation of study time, and value-directed remembering. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.007
  • Roediger, H. L., III. (1974). Inhibiting effects of recall. Memory & Cognition, 2(2), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208993
  • Roediger, H. L., III, & Schmidt, S. R. (1980). Output interference in the recall of categorized and paired-associate lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.1.91
  • Román, A., El Fathi, A., & Santiago, J. (2013). Spatial biases in understanding descriptions of static scenes: The role of reading and writing direction. Memory & Cognition, 41(4), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0285-2
  • Román, A., Flumini, A., Lizano, P., Escobar, M., & Santiago, J. (2015). Reading direction causes spatial biases in mental model construction in language understanding. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18248
  • Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Selective review of cognitive aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(5), 754–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617710000706
  • Salthouse, T. A. (2019). Trajectories of normal cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging, 34(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000288
  • Schwartz, S. T., Siegel, A. L. M., & Castel, A. D. (2020). Strategic encoding and enhanced memory for positive value-location associations. Memory & Cognition, 48(6), 1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01034-4
  • Sederberg, P. B., Miller, J. F., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2010). The temporal contiguity effect predicts episodic memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 38(6), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.6.689
  • Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.328
  • Siegel, A. L., & Castel, A. D. (2019). Age-related differences in metacognition for memory capacity and selectivity. Memory, 27(9), 1236–1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1645859
  • Siegel, A. L. M., & Castel, A. D. (2018a). Memory for important item-location associations in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 33(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000209
  • Siegel, A. L. M., & Castel, A. D. (2018b). The role of attention in remembering important item-location associations. Memory & Cognition, 46(8), 1248–1262. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0834-4
  • Siegel, A. L. M., Schwartz, S. T., & Castel, A. D. (2021). Selective memory disrupted in intra-modal dual-task encoding conditions. Memory & Cognition, 49(7), 1453–1472. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01166-1
  • Spalek, T. M., & Hammad, S. (2005). The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psychological Science, 16(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00774.x
  • Speedie, L. J., Wertman, E., Verfaellie, M., Butter, C., Silberman, N., Liechtenstein, M., & Heilman, K. M. (2002). Reading direction and spatial neglect. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 38(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70638-5
  • Spillers, G. J., & Unsworth, N. (2011). Variation in working memory capacity and temporal–contextual retrieval from episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1532–1539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024852
  • Stefanidi, A., Ellis, D. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2018). Free recall dynamics in value-directed remembering. Journal of Memory and Language, 100, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.11.004
  • Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1024
  • Thomas, A. K., & Gutchess, A. (Eds.). (2020). The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Aging: A Life Course Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  • Unsworth, N. (2019). Individual differences in long-term memory. Psychological Bulletin, 145(1), 79–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000176
  • Vallesi, A., Tronelli, V., Lomi, F., & Pezzetta, R. (2021). Age differences in sustained attention tasks: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(6), 1755–1775. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01908-x
  • Van der Henst, J. B., & Schaeken, W. (2005). The wording of conclusions in relational reasoning. Cognition, 97(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.008
  • Warrington, K. L., McGowan, V. A., Paterson, K. B., & White, S. J. (2019). Effects of adult aging on letter position coding in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Psychology and Aging, 34(4), 598–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000342
  • Zanto, T. P., & Gazzaley, A. (2017). Selective attention and inhibitory control in the aging brain. In R. Cabeza, L. Nyberg, & D. C. Park (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of aging: Linking cognitive and cerebral aging (pp. 207–234). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199372935.003.0009

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.