Symptom Validity Test Failure Indicates Invalidity of Neuropsychological Tests

References

• Bigler , E D . 2001 . The lesion(s) in traumatic brain injury: Implications for clinical neuropsychology . Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology , 16 : 95 – 131 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. (Ed.). (2007). Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective. New York: The Guilford Press
   Google Scholar
• Bush , S , Ruff , M , Troster , I , Barth , J , Koffler , S Pliskin , N . 2005 . NAN position paper. Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity. Nan Policy and Planning Committee . Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology , 20 : 419 – 426 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCoster, J. (2004). Data analysis in SPSS. Retrieved August 9, 2010 from http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html
   Google Scholar
• Fox , D D . 1990, 2009 . Manual for the Computerized Test of Attention and Memory, , 8th , Glendale, CA : D. D. Fox .
   Google Scholar
• Fox, D., & Lees-Haley, P. (1995, June). Preliminary validation of a new test of malingered memory problems: The CTAM. Presented at the Computerized Behavioral Testing of Humans in Neurotoxicology Research. Portland, OR
   Google Scholar
• Golden , C and Freshwater , S . 2002 . The Stroop Color and Word Test Manual , Wood Dale, IL : Stoelting Co .
   Google Scholar
• Green , P . 2007 . “ Spoiled for choice: Making comparisons between forced choice effort tests ” . In Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective , Edited by: Boone , K. 50 – 77 . New York : The Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., Allen, L. M., & Astner, K. (1996). The Word Memory Test [manual]: A user's guide to the oral and computer-administered forms (US Version 1.1). Durham, NC: CogniSyst, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Green , P , Rohling , M L , Lees-Haley , P R and Allen , L M . 2001 . Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants . Brain Injury , 15 ( 12 ) : 1045 – 1060 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton , R K , Miller , S W , Taylor , M J and Grant , I . 2004 . Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery:Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African-American and Caucasian adults , Lutz, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Heaton , R and Staff. , PA R . 2005 . WCST: Computer version 4 – Research edition [computer software] , Lutz, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources .
   Google Scholar
• Heilbronner , R L , Sweet , J J , Morgan , J E , Larrabee , G J , Millis , S R and Conference Participants . 2009 . American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering . The Clinical Neuropsychologist , 23 : 1093 – 1129 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb , B and Whishaw , I . 1990 . Fundamentals of human neuropsychology, , 3rd , New York : W. H. Freeman & Co .
   Google Scholar
• Larrabee , G J . 2003 . Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests . The Clinical Neuropsychologist , 17 : 410 – 425 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee , G J . 2007 . Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lezak , M D , Howieson , D B and Loring , D W . 2004 . Neuropsychological assessment, , 4th , Oxford : New York .
   Google Scholar
• McGrath , R E , Mitchell , M , Kim , B H and Hough , L . 2010 . Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment . Psychological Bulletin , 136 ( 3 ) : 450 – 470 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , J E and Meyers , K R . 1995 . Rey Complex Figure Test and recognition trial: Professional manual , Lutz, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources .
   Google Scholar
• Miller , L S and Rohling , M L . 2001 . A statistical interpretive method for neuropsychological test data . Neuropsychology Review , 11 : 143 – 169 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar