350
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Issues

The Continuous Visual Memory Test: Update and extension on the operating characteristics as an embedded measure of cognitive performance validity

Pages 194-206 | Received 15 Jun 2021, Accepted 22 Nov 2021, Published online: 10 Dec 2021

References

  • American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. (1993). Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 86–87.
  • Armistead-Jehle, P., & Buican, B. (2013). Comparison of select Advanced Clinical Solutions embedded effort measures to the Word Memory Test in the detection of suboptimal effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28, 297–301.
  • Boone, K. (2021). Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective, second edition. The Guilford Press.
  • Green, P. (2005). Green’s word memory test for windows: User’s manual. Green’s Publishing, Inc.
  • Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Conference Participants. (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(7), 1093–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040903155063
  • Henry, G. K., & Enders, C. (2007). Probable malingering and performance on the Continuous Visual Memory Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 267–274.
  • Krishnan, M., & Donders, J. (2011). Embedded assessment of validity using the Continuous Visual Memory Test in patients with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(3), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr010
  • Larrabee, G. J. (2009). Malingering scales for the Continuous Recognition Memory Test and the Continuous Visual Memory Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(1), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040801968443
  • Macciocchi, S., Seel, R., Alderson, A., & Godsall, R. (2006). Victoria Symptom Validity Test performance in acute severe traumatic brain injury: Implications for test interpretation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(5), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.003
  • Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). [Formula: see text]Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597
  • Martin, P., Schroeder, R., Olsen, D., Maloy, H., Boettcher, A., Ernst, N., & Okut, H. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(1), 88–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1637027
  • Miele, A., Gunner, J. H., Lynch, J. K., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2012). Are embedded validity indices equivalent to free-standing symptom validity tests? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 27(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr084
  • Schroeder, R. W., Martin, P. K., & Odland, A. P. (2016). Expert beliefs and practices regarding neuropsychological validity testing. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(4), 515–535.
  • Schroeder, R. W., Martin, P. K., Heinrichs, R. J., & Baade, L. E. (2019). Research methods in performance validity testing studies: Criterion grouping approach impacts study outcomes. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(3), 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1484517
  • Slick, D., Hopp, M. A., Strauss, E., & Thompson, G. B. (1997). Victoria symptom validity test. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545
  • Sweet, J., Heilbronner, R., Morgan, J., Larrabee, G., Rohling, M., Boone, K., Kirkwood, M., Schroeder, R., Suhr, J., & Conference Participants. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological Assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 35, 1053–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036
  • Trahan, D. E., & Larrabee, G. J. (1988). Continuous visual memory test: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering. Multi-Health Systems, Inc.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.