143
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CLINICAL ISSUES

Prevalence of invalid ImPACT baseline test results among high school athletes with invalidity and sandbagging indices

, , &
Pages 1516-1529 | Received 17 Jul 2022, Accepted 11 Nov 2022, Published online: 02 Dec 2022

References

  • Abeare, C. A., Messa, I., Zuccato, B. G., Merker, B., & Erdodi, L. (2018). Prevalence of invalid performance on baseline testing for sport-related concussion by age and validity indicator. JAMA Neurology, 75(6), 697–703.
  • Alsalaheen, B., Stockdale, K., Pechumer, D., & Broglio, S. P. (2016). Validity of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT). Sports Medicine, 46(10), 1487–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0532-y
  • Bailey, C. M., Echemendia, R. J., & Arnett, P. A. (2006). The impact of motivation on neuropsychological performance in sports-related mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(4), 475–484.
  • Barth, J. T., Alves, W. M., Ryan, T. V., Macciocchi, S. N., Rimel, R. W., Jane, J. A., & Nelson, W. E. (1989). Mild head injury in sports: Neuropsychological sequelae and recovery of function. In H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg, & A. L. Benton (Eds.), Mild head injury (pp. 257–275). Oxford University.
  • Binder, L. M. (1992). Forced-choice testing provides evidence of malingering. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(4), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(92)90013-M
  • Boone, K. B. (2007). A reconsideration of the Slick et al. (1999) criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction. In K. D. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment (pp. 29–49). The Guilford Press.
  • Collins, M. W., Iverson, G. I., Lovell, M. R., McKeag, D. B., Norwig, J., & Maroon, J. (2003). On-field predictors of neuropsychological and symptom deficit following sports-related concussion. Clinical Journal Sport Medicine, 13(4), 222–229.
  • Echemendia, R. J., Bruce, J. M., Bailey, C. M., Sanders, J. F., Arnett, P., & Vargas, G. (2012). The utility of post-concussion neuropsychological data in identifying cognitive change following sports-related MTBI in the absence of baseline data. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(7), 1077–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2012.721006
  • Elbin, R. J., Schatz, P., & Covassin, T. (2011). One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 19(11), 2319–2324.
  • Erdal, K. (2012). Neuropsychological testing for sports-related concussion: How athletes can sandbag their baseline testing without detection. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(5), 473–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs050
  • Erdodi, L., Korcsog, K., Considine, C., Casey, J., Scoboria, A., & Abeare, C. (2020). Introducing the ImPACT-5: An empirically derived multivariate validity composite. Journal of Head Traum Rehabilitation, 36(2), 103–113.
  • Ferris, C., & Schatz, P. (2014). A new iPad version of ImPACT is resistant to “sandbagging” (Poster Abstract). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(6), 591–591. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu038.227
  • Gaudet, C. E., & Weyandt, L. L. (2017). Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT): A systematic review of the prevalence and assessment of invalid performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 43–58.
  • Green, P., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Allen, L. M. (2003). The Word Memory Test and the validity of neuropsychological test scores. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(3–4), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1300/J151v02n03_05
  • Greve, K. W., Binder, L. M., & Bianchini, K. J. (2009). Rates of below-chance performance in forced-choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(3), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802232690
  • Higgins, K. L., Caze, T., & Maerlender, A. (2018). Validity and reliability of baseline testing in a standardized environment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 33(4), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx071
  • Higgins, K. L., Denney, R. L., & Maerlender, A. (2017). Sandbagging on the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) in a high school athlete population. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32(3), 259–266.
  • Hunt, T. N., Ferrara, M. S., Miller, L. S., & Macciocchi, S. (2007). The effect of effort on baseline neuropsychological test scores in high school football athletes. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(5), 615–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.04.005
  • Kontos, A. P., Sufrinko, A., Womble, M., & Kegel, N. (2016). Neuropsychological assessment following concussion: An evidence-based review of the role of neuropsychological assessment pre- and post-concussion. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 20(6), 38.
  • Kuhn, A. W., & Solomon, G. S. (2014). Supervision and computerized neurocognitive baseline test performance in high school athletes: An initial investigation. Journal of Athletic Training, 49(6), 800–805.
  • Larrabee, G. J. (2005). Assessment of malingering. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 116–159). Oxford University Press.
  • Lau, B. C., Collins, M. W., & Lovell, M. R. (2011). Sensitivity and specificity of subacute computerized neurocognitive testing and symptom evaluation in predicting outcomes after sports-related concussion. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(6), 1209–1216.
  • Lichtenstein, J. D., Moser, R. D. S., & Schatz, P. (2014). Age and test setting affect the prevalence of invalid baseline scores of neurocognitive tests. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(2), 479–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513509225
  • Lovell, M. (2007). ImPACT 2007 (6.0) clinical interpretation manual. ImPACT Applications, Inc.
  • Lovell, M. R. (2016). ImPACT administration and interpretation manual. ImPACT Applications, Inc.
  • Manderino, L. M., & Gunstad, J. (2018). Performance of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing protocol validity indices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 33(5), 596–605.
  • Mayers, L. B., & Redick, T. S. (2012). Clinical utility of ImPACT assessment for postconcussion return-to-play counseling: Psychometrics issues. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(3), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2011.630655
  • Messa, I., Korcsog, K., & Abeare, C. (2022). An updated review of the prevalence of invalid performance on the Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(7), 1613–1636. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1866676
  • Moser, R. S., Schatz, P., & Lichtenstein, J. D. (2015). The importance of proper administration and interpretation of neuropsychological baseline and postconcussion computerized testing. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 4(1), 41–48.
  • Moser, R. S., Schatz, P., Neidzwski, K., & Ott, S. D. (2011). Group versus individual administration affects baseline neurocognitive test performance. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(11), 2325–2330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511417114
  • Nelson, L. D., Pfaller, A. Y., Rein, L. E., & McCrea, M. A. (2015). Rates and predictors of invalid baseline test performance in high school and collegiate athletes for three computerized neurocognitive tests (CNTs): ANAM, Axon, and ImPACT. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(8), 2018–2026. doi 10.1177/0363546515587714.
  • Raab, C. A., Peak, A. S., & Knoderer, C. (2020). Half of purposeful baseline sandbaggers undetected by ImPACT’s embedded Invalidity Indicators. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(3), 283–290.
  • Randolph, C., McCrea, M., & Barr, W. B. (2005). Is neuropsychological testing useful in the management of sport-related concussion? Journal of Athletic Training, 40(3), 139–152.
  • Register-Mihalik, J. K., Kontos, D. L., Guskiewicz, K. M., Mihalik, J. P., Conder, R., & Shields, E. W. (2012). Age-related differences and reliability on computerized and paper-and-pencil neurocognitive assessment batteries. Journal of Athletic Training, 47(3), 297–305.
  • Schatz, P., & Glatts, C. (2013). “Sandbagging” baseline test performance on ImPACT, without detection, is more difficult than it appears. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(3), 236–244.
  • Schatz, P., Kelley, T., Ott, S. D., Solomon, G. D. S., Elbin, R. J., Higgins, K., & Moser, R. S. (2014). Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance. Journal of Athletic Training, 49(5), 659–664. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37
  • Schatz, P., Moser, R. S., Solomon, G. S., Ott, S. D., & Karpf, R. (2012). Prevalence of invalid computerized baseline neurocognitive test results in high school and collegiate athletes. Journal of Athletic Training, 47(3), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-47.3.14
  • Siedlik, J. A., Siscos, S., Evans, K., Rolf, A., Gallagher, P., Seeley, J., & Vardiman, J. (2016). Computerized neurocognitive assessments and detection of the malingering athlete. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 56(9), 1086–1091.
  • Szabo, A. J., Alosco, M. L., Fedor, A., & Gunstad, J. (2013). Invalid performance and the ImPACT in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I football players. Journal of Athletic Training, 48(6), 851–855. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-48.6.20
  • Tsushima, W. T., Yamamoto, M. H., Ahn, H. J., Siu, A. M., Choi, S. Y., & Murata, N. M. (2021). Invalid baseline testing with ImPACT: Does sandbagging occur with high school athletes? Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 10(3), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2019.1642202
  • Vaughan, C. G., Gerst, E. H., Sady, M. D., Newman, J. B., & Gioia, G. A. (2014). The relation between testing environment and baseline performance in child and adolescent concussion assessment. American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514531732

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.