Classification accuracy and resistance to coaching of the Spanish version of the Inventory of Problems-29 and the Inventory of Problems-Memory: A simulation study with mTBI patients

References

• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles for psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
   Google Scholar
• Aparcero, M., Picard, E. H., Nijdam-Jones, A., & Rosenfeld, B. (2023). Comparing the ability of MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF validity scales to detect feigning: A meta-analysis. Assessment, 30(3), 744–760. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211067535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (2007). Cómo evaluar el daño moral consecuencia de accidentes de tráfico: validación de un protocolo de medida [How to assess moral damages resulting from traffic accidents: validation of a measurement protocol]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 28, 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2021.1906798
   Google Scholar
• Banovic, I., Filippi, F., Viglione, D. J., Scrima, F., Zennaro, A., Zappalà, A., & Giromini, L. (2022). Detecting coached feigning of schizophrenia with the Inventory of Problems – 29 (IOP-29) and its memory module (IOP-M): A simulation study on a French community sample. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 21(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2021.1906798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegren, A. (2020). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchini, K. J., Greve, K. W., & Glynn, G. (2005). On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: Lessons from cognitive malingering research. The Spine Journal: Official Journal of the North American Spine Society, 5(4), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boskovic, I., & Akca, A. Y. E. (2022). Presenting the consequences of feigning: Does it diminish symptom overendorsement? An analog study. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 1–10. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2044329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boskovic, I., Akca, A. Y. E., & Giromini, L. (2022). Symptom coaching and symptom validity tests: An analog study using the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology, Self-Report Symptom Inventory, and Inventory of Problems-29. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 1–13. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2057856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosi, J., Minassian, L., Ales, F., Akca, A., Winters, C., Viglione, D. J., Zennaro, A., & Giromini, L. (2022). The sensitivity of the IOP-29 and IOP-M to coached feigning of depression and mTBI: An online simulation study in a community sample from the United Kingdom. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 1–13. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2115910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchett, D., & Bagby, R. M. (2022). Assessing negative response bias: A review of the noncredible overreporting scales of the MMPI‑2‑RF and MMPI-3. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09435-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., Reis, A., Colombarolli, M. S., Pasian, S. R., Miguel, F. K., Erdodi, L. A., Viglione, D. J., & Giromini, L. (2021). Discriminating feigned from credible PTSD symptoms: A validation of a Brazilian version of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law, 14(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09403-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo, M., González-Ordi, H., Gómez-Gutiérrez, M., & Santamaría, P. (2020). CIT, Cuestionario de Impacto del Trauma [Trauma Impact Questionnaire]. TEA Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, K. L., Aguerrevere, L. E., Bianchini, K. J., Greve, K. W., & Nicks, R. C. (2019). Detecting malingered pain-related disability with the pain catastrophizing scale: a criterion groups validation study. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(8), 1485–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1575470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Merckelbach, H., & Merten, T. (2022). Cry for help as a root cause of poor symptom validity: A critical note. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 1–6. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2040025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., van Twillert, B., van de Sande, P., van Os, Y., & Ponds, R. W. (2016). Poor symptom and performance validity in regularly referred Hospital outpatients: Link with standard clinical measures, and role of incentives. Psychiatry Research, 239, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugherty, J. C., Querido, L., Quiroz, N., Wang, D., Hidalgo-Ruzzante, N., Fernandes, S., Pérez-García, M., De Los Reyes-Aragon, C. J., Pires, R., & Valera, E. (2021). The coin in hand–extended version: Development and validation of a multicultural performance validity test. Assessment, 28(1), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119864652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L., Calamia, M., Holcomb, M., Robinson, A., Rasmussen, L., & Bianchini, K. (2023). M is for performance validity: The IOP-M provides a cost-effective measure of the credibility of memory deficits during neuropsychological evaluations. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 1–17. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2023.2168581
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, R. (2018). Feigned amnesia and memory problems. In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gegner, J., Erdodi, L. A., Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Bosi, J., & Brusadelli, E. (2022). An Australian study on feigned mTBI using the Inventory of Problems - 29 (IOP-29), its Memory Module (IOP-M), and the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT). Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 29(5), 1221–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1864375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Lettieri, S. C., Zizolfi, S., Zizolfi, D., Viglione, D. J., Brusadelli, E., Perfetti, B., di Carlo, D. A., & Zennaro, A. (2019). Beyond rare-symptoms endorsement: A clinical comparison simulation study using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law, 12(3-4), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09357-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., & Viglione, D. J. (2022). Assessing negative response bias with the Inventory of Problems‑29 (IOP‑29): A quantitative literature review. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09437-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2018). A clinical comparison, simulation study testing the validity of SIMS and IOP-29 with an Italian sample. Psychological Injury and Law, 11(4), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-018-9314-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Zennaro, A., Maffei, A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2020). SVT meets PVT: Development and initial validation of the Inventory of Problems – Memory (IOP-M). Psychological Injury and Law, 13(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09385-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Young, G., & Sellbom, M. (2022). Assessing negative response bias using self-report measures: New articles, new issues. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09444-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Ordi, H., & Santamaría Fernández, P. (2009). Adaptación española del Inventario Estructurado de Simulación de Síntomas. – SIMS [Spanish adaptation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology – SIMS]. TEA Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Gorny, I., & Merten, T. (2006). Symptom information – warning – coaching. How do they affect successful feigning in neuropsychological assessment? Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4(4), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1300/J151v04n04_05
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, M., Pyne, S., Cutler, L., Oikle, D. A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023). Take their word for it: The inventory of problems provides valuable information on both symptom and performance validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(4), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2114358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgunaite, G., Giromini, L., Bosi, J., Viglione, D. J., & Zennaro, A. (2022). A clinical comparison simulation study using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Lithuania. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 29(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1725518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N. S., Crawford, S., Wenden, F. J., Moss, N. E., & Wade, D. T. (1995). The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: A measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. Journal of Neurology, 242(9), 587–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosky, K. M., Lace, J. W., Austin, T. A., Seitz, D. J., & Clark, B. (2022). The utility of the Wisconsin card sorting test, 64-card version to detect noncredible attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 29(5), 1231–1241. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1864633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín-Torices, M. I., Hidalgo-Ruzzante, N., Daugherty, J. C., Jiménez- González, P., & Perez Garcia, M. (2018). Validation of neuropsychological consequences in victims of intimate partner violence in a Spanish population using specific effort tests. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1339106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merckelbach, H., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., van Helvoort, D., Jelicic, M., & Otgaar, H. (2019). When patients overreport symptoms: More than just malingering. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419837681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten, T., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Hall, V., Bodner, T., Giromini, L., Lehrner, J., González-Ordi, H., Santamaría, P., Schmand, B., & Di Stefano, G. (2022). Symptom and performance validity assessment in European Countries: An update. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09436-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten, T., Giger, P., Merckelbach, H., & Stevens, A. (2019). Self-report Symptom Inventory (SRSI) – deutsche Version. Manual [German version of the Self-Report Symptom Inventory. Manual]. Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Merten, T., & Merckelbach, H. (2020). Factious disorders and malingering. In J. R. Geddes, N. C. Andreasen, & G. M. Goodwin (Eds.), New Oxford textbook of psychiatry (3rd ed., pp. 1342–1349). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. (2nd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Pignolo, C., Giromini, L., Ales, F., & Zennaro, A. (2023). Detection of feigning of different symptom presentations with the PAI and IOP-29. Assessment, 30(3), 565–579. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211061282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina, D., Puente-López, E., Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., Llor-Esteban, B., & Aguerrevere, L. E. (2022). Self-report measures for symptom validity assessment in whiplash-associated disorders. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 14(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2022a7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puente-López, E., Pina, D., Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., & Llor-Esteban, B. (2021). Classification accuracy of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS) in motor vehicle accident patients. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 32(1), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2020.1833073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puente-López, E., Pina, D., López-López, R., Ordi, H. G., Bošković, I., & Merten, T. (2022b). Prevalence estimates of symptom feigning and malingering in Spain. Psychological Injury and Law, 16(1), 1–17. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09458-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puente-López, E., Pina, D., López-Nicolás, R., Iguacel, I., & Arce, R. (2023). The Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): A systematic review and bivariate diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puente-López, E., Pina, D., Shura, R., Boskovic, I., Martínez-Jarreta, B., & Merten, T. (2022a). The impact of different forms of coaching on the structured inventory of malingered symtomatology (SIMS). Psicothema, 34(4), 528–536. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2022.129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Cruise, K. R. (1998). Assessment of malingering with simulation design: Threats to external validity. Law and Human Behavior, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025702405865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Gillard, N. D. (2011). Research methods for the assessment of malingering. In B. Rosenfeld & S. D. Penrod (Eds.), Research methods in forensic psychology (pp. 174–188). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Martin, M. A., & Vitacco, M. J. (2003). Detection of feigned mental disorders: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering. Assessment, 10(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103010002007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roma, P., Giromini, L., Burla, F., Ferracuti, S., Viglione, D. J., & Mazza, C. (2020). Ecological validity of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): An Italian study of court-ordered, psychological injury evaluations using the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) as criterion variable. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09368-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roor, J. J., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., & Ponds, R. W. (2016). A case of misdiagnosis of mild cognitive impairment: The utility of symptom validity testing in an outpatient memory clinic. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 23(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2016.1030018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, E. M. S., Slick, D. J., & Iverson, G. L. (2020). Multidimensional malingering criteria for neuropsychological assessment: A 20-year update of the malingered neuropsychological dysfunction criteria. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 35(6), 735–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shreffler, J., & Huecker, M. R. (2022). Type I and type II errors and statistical power. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shura, R. D., Ord, A. S., & Worthen, M. D. (2022). Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology: A psychometric review. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09432-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. P., & Burger, G. K. (1997). Detection of malingering: Validation of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of the American Academy on Psychiatry and Law, 25, 180–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šömen, M. M., Lesjak, S., Majaron, T., Lavopa, L., Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., & Podlesek, A. (2021). Using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Inventory of Problems Memory (IOP-M) in malingering-related assessments: A study with a Slovenian sample of experimental feigners. Psychological Injury and Law, 14(2), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09412-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbuechel, N. V., Rauen, K., Bockhop, F., Covic, A., Krenz, U., Plass, A. M., Cunitz, K., Polinder, S., Wilson, L., Steyerberg, E. W., Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D., Wu, Y. J., & Zeldovich, M. (2021). Psychometric characteristics of the patient-reported outcome measures applied in the CENTER-TBI study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(11), 2396. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., & Suhr, J. A. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(6), 1053–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering (TOMM). Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• van der Heide, D., Boskovic, I., van Harten, P., & Merckelbach, H. (2020). Overlooking feigning behavior may result in potential harmful treatment interventions: Two cases of undetected malingering. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 65(4), 1371–1375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & Merten, T. (2014). The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(8), 1336–1365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.984763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., & Giromini, L. (2020). Inventory of Problems–29: Professional Manual. IOP-Test. LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., Giromini, L., & Landis, P. (2017). The development of the Inventory of Problems-29: A brief self-administered measure for discriminating bona fide from feigned psychiatric and cognitive complaints. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1233882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilar-López, R., Daugherty, J. C., Pérez-García, M., & Piñón-Blanco, A. (2021). A pilot study on the adequacy of the TOMM in detecting invalid performance in patients with substance use disorders. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 43(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2021.1912298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widows, M. R., & Smith, G. P. (2005). SIMS: Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, C. L., Giromini, L., Crawford, T. J., Ales, F., Viglione, D. J., & Warmelink, L. (2021). An Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1767720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, G., Foote, W. E., Kerig, P. K., Mailis, A., Brovko, J., Kohutis, E. A., McCall, S., Hapidou, E. G., Fokas, K. F., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2020). Introducing psychological injury and law. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(4), 452–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09396-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar