Mental states as generalizations from experience: a neuro-computational hypothesis

References

• Baillargeon, R., R. M. Scott, and Z. He. 2010. False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, no. 3: 110–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfill, S., and I. A. Apperly. in press. How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind & Language, ,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Call, J. 2001. Chimpanzee social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, no. 9: 388–93. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01728-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Call, J., and M. Tomasello. 2008. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, no. 5: 187–92. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuster, J. 2001. The prefrontal cortex – an update: Time is of the essence. Neuron, 30, no. 2: 319–33. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00285-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuster, J. 2003. Cortex and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grill-Spector, K., Z. Kourtzi, and N. Kanwisher. 2001. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research, 41: 1409–22. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00073-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutto, D., M. Hersbach, and V. Southgate. 2011. Social cognition. Mindreading and its alternatives. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, no. 3: 375–95. doi: 10.1007/s13164-011-0073-0
   Google Scholar
• Iacoboni, M. 2009. Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60: 653–70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, P. 2011. The direct-perception model of empathy: A critique. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, no. 3: 519–40. doi: 10.1007/s13164-011-0065-0
   Google Scholar
• Keysers, C., and D. I. Perrett. 2004. Demystifying social cognition: A Hebbian perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, no. 11: 501–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, J., and B. Wang. 2011. On the long road to mentalism in children’s spontaneous false-belief understanding: Are we there yet?. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, no. 3: 411–28. doi: 10.1007/s13164-011-0067-y
   Google Scholar
• Mazzone, M. 2013. Attention to the speaker. The conscious assessment of utterance interpretations in working memory. Language & Communication, 33, no. 2: 106–14. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzone, M., and E. Lalumera. 2010. Concepts. Stored or created?. Minds and Machines, 20, no. 1: 47–68. doi: 10.1007/s11023-010-9184-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. N., and R. Brooks. 2008. Self-experience as a mechanism for learning about others: A training study in social cognition. Developmental Psychology, 44, no. 5: 1257–65. doi: 10.1037/a0012888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onishi, K. H., and R. Baillargeon. 2005. Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs?. Science, 308: 255–58. doi: 10.1126/science.1107621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, D. C., and D. J. Povinelli. 2007. On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a ‘theory of mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences, 362: 731–44. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.2023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perner, J. 1991. The representational mind. Brighton: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Perner, J. 2010. Who took the cog out of cognitive science? Mentalism in an era of anti-cognitivism. In Cognition and neuropsychology: International perspectives on psychological science (Volume 1), ed. P. A. Frensch and R. Schwarzer, 241–61. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perner, J. in press. Theory of mind-an unintelligent design: From behaviour to teleology and perspective. In Handbook of theory of mind, ed. A. M. Leslie and T. C. German. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perner, J., and T. Ruffman. 2005. Infants’ insight into the mind: How deep?. Science, 308: 214–16. doi: 10.1126/science.1111656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povinelli, D. J., and J. Vonk. 2003. Chimpanzee minds: Suspiciously human?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, no. 4: 157–60. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00053-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povinelli, D. J., and J. Vonk. 2004. We don't need a microscope to explore the chimpanzee's mind. Mind & Language, 19: 1–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00244.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premack, D., and G. Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, no. 4: 515–26. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., and A. Knoblauch. 2009. Discrete combinatorial circuits emerging in neural networks: A mechanism for rules of grammar in the human brain?. Neural networks, 22: 161–72. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffman, T., and J. Perner. 2005. Do infants really understand false belief?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, no. 10: 462–3. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senju, A., V. Southgate, C. Snape, M. Leonard, and G. Csibra. 2011. Do 18-month-olds really attribute mental states to others? A critical test. Psychological Science, 22: 878–80. doi: 10.1177/0956797611411584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. B. 2001. How domain-general processes may create domain-specific biases. In Language acquisition and conceptual development, ed. M. Bowerman and S. J. Levinson, 101–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spaulding, S. 2011. A critique of embodied simulation. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, no. 3: 579–99. doi: 10.1007/s13164-011-0071-2
   Google Scholar
• Whiten, A. 1996. When does smart behavior-reading become mind-reading?. In Theories of theories of mind, ed. P. Carruthers and P. K. Smith, 277–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whiten, A., and T. Suddendorf. 2001. Meta-representation and secondary representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, no. 9: 378 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01734-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar