704
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The need for new ontologies in psychiatry

Pages 146-159 | Received 17 Mar 2017, Accepted 17 Mar 2017, Published online: 05 May 2017

References

  • Anderson, M. 2015. “Mining the Brain for a New Taxonomy of the Mind.” Philosophy Compass 10 (1): 68–77. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12155
  • APA (American Psychiatric Association) 1980. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  • APA (American Psychiatric Association) 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  • Bechtel, W. 2005. “The Challenge of Characterizing Operations in the Mechanisms Underlying Behavior.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 84: 313–325. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.103-04
  • Cuthbert, B. N. 2015. “Research Domain Criteria: Toward Future Psychiatric Nosologies.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 17 (1): 89–97.
  • Cuthbert, B. N., and T. R. Insel. 2010. “Toward New Approaches to Psychotic Disorders: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria Project.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 36 (6): 1061–1062.
  • Cuthbert, B. N., and T. R. Insel. 2013. “Toward the Future of Psychiatric Diagnosis: The Seven Pillars of RDoC.” BMC Medicine 11: 126. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-126.
  • Feighner, J. P., E. Robins, S. B. Guze, R. A. Jr. Woodruff, G. Winokur, and R. Munoz. 1972. “Diagnostic Criteria for Use in Psychiatric Research.” Archives of General Psychiatry 26 (1): 57–63. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750190059011
  • Galatzer-Levy, I. R., and R. A. Bryant. 2013. “636,120 Ways to Have Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.” Perspectives in Psychological Science 8 (6): 651–662. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504115
  • Hacking, I. 1992. “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by A. Pickering, 29–64. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Insel, T. 2013. “ Transforming Diagnosis.” NIMH Director’s Blog. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/directors/thomas-insel/blog/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtml.
  • Insel, T. R. 2014. “The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: Precision Medicine for Psychiatry.” American Journal of Psychiatry 171 (4): 396–397.
  • Insel, T., B. Cuthbert, M. Garvey, R. Heinssen, D. S. Pine, K. Quinn, C. Sanislow, and P. Wang. 2010. “Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a New Classification Framework for Psychiatry.” American Journal of Psychiatry 167 (7): 748–751. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379
  • Insel, T. R., S. E. Morris, and R. K. Heinssen. 2011. “Standardization, Integration, and Sharing – Leveraging Research Investments.” Biological Psychiatry 70 (1): 5–6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.004
  • Klein, C. 2012. “Cognitive Ontology and Region- Versus Network-Oriented Analyses.” Philosophy of Science 79 (5): 952–960. doi: 10.1086/667843
  • Lewis, J., P. Atkinson, J. Harrington, and K. Featherstone. 2013. “Representation and Practical Accomplishment in the Laboratory: When is an Animal Model Good-Enough?” Sociology 43 (4): 776–792. doi: 10.1177/0038038512457276
  • Lilienfeld, S. O. 2014. “The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): An Analysis of Methodological and Conceptual Challenges.” Behaviour Research and Therapy 62: 129–139. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.019
  • Morris, S. E., and B. N. Cuthbert. 2012. “Research Domain Criteria: Cognitive Systems, Neural Circuits, and Dimensions of Behavior.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 14 (1): 29–37.
  • National Institute of Mental Health. 2008. The National Institute of Mental Health Strategic Plan. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
  • National Institute of Mental Health. 2014. “ NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC).” Accessed 30 November 2014. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/research-priorities/rdoc/nimh-research-domain-criteria-rdoc.shtml.
  • Posner, Michael I, Steven E. Petersen, Peter T. Fox, and Marcus E. Raichle. 1988. “Localization of Cognitive Operations in the Brain.” Science 240 (4859): 1627–1631. doi: 10.1126/science.3289116
  • Price, Cathy, and Karl Friston. 2005. “Functional Ontologies for Cognition: The Systematic Definition of Structure and Function.” Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3): 262–275. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000095
  • Robins, E., and S. Guze. 1970. “Establishment of Diagnostic Validity in Psychiatry: Its Application to Schizophrenia.” American Journal of Psychiatry 126 (7): 983–987. doi: 10.1176/ajp.126.7.983
  • Ross, D. A. 2014. “Syndrome Stabilization in Psychiatry: Pathological Gambling as a Case Study.” In Classifying Psychopathology: Mental Kinds and Natural Kinds, edited by Harold Kincaid and Jacqueline Sullivan, 257–281. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Sanislow, C. A., D. S. Pine, K. J. Quinn, M. J. Kozak, M. A. Garvey, R. K. Heinssen, and P. S. Wang. 2010. “Developing Constructs for Psychopathology Research: Research Domain Criteria.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 119 (4): 631–639. doi: 10.1037/a0020909
  • Shorter, E. 2013. “The History of DSM.” In Making the DSM-5: Concepts and Controversies, edited by J. Paris and J. Phillips, 3–19. New York: Springer.
  • Sullivan, J. A. 2009. “The Multiplicity of Experimental Protocols: A Challenge to Reductionist Neuroscience.” Synthese 167: 511–539. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9389-4
  • Sullivan, J. A. 2010. “Reconsidering ‘Spatial Memory’ and the Morris Water Maze.” Synthese 177: 261–283. doi: 10.1007/s11229-010-9849-5
  • Sullivan, J. 2014. “Stabilizing Mental Disorders: Prospects and Problems.” In Classifying Psychopathology: Mental Kinds and Natural Kinds, edited by Harold Kincaid and Jacqueline Sullivan, 257–281. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Sullivan, J. A. 2016. “Stabilizing Constructs Through Collaboration Across Different Research Fields as a Way to Foster the Integrative Approach of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 309. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00309.
  • Whooley, O., and A. Horwitz. 2013. “The Paradox of Professional Success: Grand Ambition, Furious Resistance, and the Derailment of the DSM-5 Revision Process.” In Making the DSM-5: Concepts and Controversies, edited by J. Paris and J. Phillips, 75–92. New York: Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.