Interface problems in the explanation of action

References

• Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret. 2000. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. “Perceptions of Perceptual Symbols.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4): 637–660. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulenger, Véronique, Alice C. Roy, Yves Paulignan, Viviane Deprez, Marc Jeannerod, and Tatjana A. Nazir. 2006. “Cross-talk between Language Processes and Overt Motor Behavior in the First 200 msec of Processing.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (10): 1607–1615. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratman, Michael. 1999. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnston, Daniel C. 2016. “Cognitive Penetration and the Cognition–Perception Interface.” Synthese 1–24. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1116-y.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfill, Stephen A., and Corrado Sinigaglia. 2014. “Intention and Motor Representation in Purposive Action.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1): 119–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00604.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, Craig G., Michael K. Tanenhaus, Kathleen M. Eberhard, Hana Filip, and Greg N. Carlson. 2002. “Circumscribing Referential Domains during Real-time Language Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 47 (1): 30–49. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisek, P., and J. F. Kalaska. 2010. “Neural Mechanisms for Interacting With a World Full of Action Choices.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 33: 269–298. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, Donald. 1963. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” The Journal of Philosophy 60 (23): 685–700.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Donald. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events: Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elsner, B., and B. Hommel. 2001. “Effect Anticipation and Action Control.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (1): 229–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagioli, Sabrina, Bernhard Hommel, and Ricarda Ines Schubotz. 2007. “Intentional Control of Attention: Action Planning Primes Action-related Stimulus Dimensions.” Psychological Research 71 (1): 22–29. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0033-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, Jonathan R., Isabel Gauthier, and Thomas J. Palmeri. 2012. “How Category Learning Affects Object, Representations: Not All Morph Spaces Stretch Alike.” Journal of Experimental, Learning, Memory & Cognition 38 (4): 807–820. doi: 10.1037/a0025836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, Arthur M., Raymond Becker, Susann Klötzer, Lidia Kolanko, Silvana Müller, and Mike Rinck. 2009. “Episodic Affordances Contribute to Language Comprehension.” Language and Cognition 1 (1): 113–135. doi: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.006
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, Arthur M., and Michael P. Kaschak. 2002. “Grounding Language in Action.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (3): 558–565. doi: 10.3758/BF03196313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, Scott, David A. Rosenbaum, Jeremy Graham, and Peter Dixon. 2004. “Grasping the Meaning of Words.” Experimental Brain Research 154 (1): 103–108. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1659-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone, Robert L., and Andrew T. Hendrickson. 2010. “Categorical Perception.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1 (1): 69–78. doi:10.1002/wcs.26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, C. L. 2008. “Color Qualities and the Physical World.” In The Case for Qualia, edited by Edmond Wright, 143–154. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helbig, Hannah Barbara, Markus Graf, and Markus Kiefer. 2006. “The Role of Action Representations in Visual Object Recognition.” Experimental Brain Research 174 (2): 221–228. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0443-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. 2004. “Event Files: Feature Binding in and Across Perception and Action.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (11): 494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., J. Musseler, G. Aschersleben, and W. Prinz. 2001. “The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A Framework for Perception and Action Planning.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5): 849–878. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, Falk, and Gerry T. M. Altmann. 2007. “Visual-shape Competition during Language-mediated Attention is based on Lexical Input and Not Modulated by Contextual Appropriateness.” Visual Cognition 15 (8): 985–1018. doi: 10.1080/13506280601130875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memelink, Jiska, and Bernhard Hommel. 2013. “Intentional Weighting: A Basic Principle in Cognitive Control.” Psychological Research 77 (3): 249–259. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos, Myrto, and Elisabeth Pacherie. 2016. “Intentions and Motor Representations: The Interface Challenge.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1–20. doi:10.1007/s13164-016-0311-6.
   Google Scholar
• Myung, Jong-yoon, Sheila E. Blumstein, and Julie C. Sedivy. 2006. “Playing on the Typewriter, Typing on the Piano: Manipulation Knowledge of Objects.” Cognition 98 (3): 223–243. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanay, Bence. 2016. “The Role of Imagination in Decision-Making.” Mind & Language 31 (1): 127–143. doi: 10.1111/mila.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacherie, Elisabeth. 2000. “The Content of Intentions.” Mind & Language 15 (4): 400–432. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacherie, Elisabeth. 2008. “The Phenomenology of Action: A Conceptual Framework.” Cognition 107 (1): 179–217. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Railton, Peter. 2009. “Practical Competence and Fluent Agency.” In Reasons for Action, edited by D. Sobel and S. Wall, 81–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511720185.005
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedivy, Julie C., Michael K. Tanenhaus, Craig G. Chambers, and Gregory N. Carlson. 1999. “Achieving Incremental Semantic Interpretation through Contextual Representation.” Cognition 71 (2): 109–147. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00025-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivey, Michael. 2008. The Continuity of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Mike, and Rob Ellis. 2001. “The Potentiation of Grasp Types during Visual Object Categorization.” Visual Cognition 8 (6): 769–800. doi: 10.1080/13506280042000144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainio, Lari, Ed Symes, Rob Ellis, Mike Tucker, and Giovanni Ottoboni. 2008. “On the Relations between Action Planning, Object Identification, and Motor Representations of Observed Actions and Objects.” Cognition 108 (2): 444–465. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidner, R., and H. J. Muller. 2009. “Dimensional Weighting of Primary and Secondary Target-defining Dimensions in Visual Search for Singleton Conjunction Targets.” Psychological Research 73 (2): 198–211. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0208-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W. 2011. “Confronting Many-many Problems: Attention and Agentive Control.” Noûs 45 (1): 50–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00804.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, X., T. Geyer, L. Assumpcao, H. J. Muller, and Z. Shi. 2016. “From Foreground to Background: How Task-neutral Context Influences Contextual Cueing of Visual Search.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar