Subject-centred reasons and bestowal love

References

• Abramson, K., and A. Leite. 2001. “Love as a Reactive Emotion.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245): 673–699.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. 1999. Finite and Infinite Goods. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. 1970. “Perennial Problems in the Field of Emotion.” In Feelings and Emotions, edited by M. Arnold, 149–185. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bagley, B. 2015. “Loving Someone in Particular.” Ethics 125 (2): 477–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhadwar, N. 2005. “Love.” In Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics, edited by E. LaFollette, 43–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brentlinger, J. 1989. “The Nature of Love.” In Eros, Agape and Philia, edited by A. Soble, 136–148. St. Paul: Paragon House.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, B. 2015. On Romantic Love: Simple Truths About a Complex Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. 1987. Analyzing Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. W. 2012. Love and Other Emotions: On the Process of Feeling. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, E., M. Abbott, A. Angleitner, A. Asherian, A. Biaggio, A. Blanco-Villasenor, M. Bruchon-Schweitzer, et al. 1990. “International Preferences in Selecting Mates.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 21 (1): 5–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. 2006. Reasons and the Good. Vol. 57. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dancy, J. 2000. Practical Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deonna, J. A., and K. R. Scherer. 2010. “The Case of the Disappearing Intentional Object: Constraints on a Definition of Emotion.” Emotion Review 2 (1): 44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sousa, R. 2015. Love: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, N. 2007. “Romantic Love, Appraisal, and Commitment.” The Philosophical Forum 38 (4): 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edyvane, D. 2003. “Against Unconditional Love.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1): 59–75.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. 2013. “Appraisal Theory: Old and New Questions.” Emotion Review 5 (2): 125–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P., and K. Scherer. 2003. “Appraisal Processes in Emotion.” In Handbook of Affective Sciences, edited by R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, and H. H. Goldsmith, 572–595. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epictetus. The Enchiridion. Translated by Carter, E.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, B., and J. Russell. 1984. “Conept of Emotion Viewed from a Prototype Perspective.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 113 (3): 464–486.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, G. 2011. “Overcoming a Euthyphro Problem in Personal Love: Imagination and Personal Identity.” Philosophical Psychology 24 (6): 825–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. G. 1982. “The Importance of What We Care About.” Synthese 53: 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. G. 1998. “Duty and Love.” Philosophical Explorations 1 (1): 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. G. 1999. Necessity, Volition, and Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. G. 2004. The Reasons of Love. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. G. 2006. Taking Ourselves Seriously & Getting It Right. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hales, S. D. 1995. “The Impossibility of Unconditional Love.” Public Affairs Quarterly 9 (4): 317–320.
   Google Scholar
• Halwani, R. 2010. “Romantic Love.” In Philosophy of Sex, Love and Marriage, edited by R. Halwani, 32–49. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlyn, D. W. 1978. “The Phenomena of Love and Hate.” Philosophy 53 (203): 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, B. 2009. “Love, Identification, and the Emotions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1): 39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, B. W. 2010. Love, Friendship and the Self. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, H. 2016. “Against Strong Cognitivism: An Argument from the Particularity of Love.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (3): 563–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jollimore, T. A. 2011. Love’s Vision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jollimore, T. 2017. “Love: The Vision View.” In Love, Reason and Morality, edited by E. Kroeker and K. Schaubroeck, 1–19. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, S. 2000. “How Do I Love Thee? Let Me Count the Properties.” American Philosophical Quarterly 37 (2): 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, A. 1963. Action, Emotion, and Will. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodny, N. 2003. ““Love as Valuing a Relationship.” Philosophical Review 112 (2): 135–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R. 1987. “Love De Re.” Midwest Studies In Philosophy 10 (1): 413–430.
   Google Scholar
• Lamy, L. 2016. “Beyond Emotion.” Emotion Review 8 (2): 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. 2001. “Relational Meaning and Discrete Emotions, in Appraisal Processes.” In Emotion, edited by K. Scherer, A. Schorr, and T. Johnstone, 37–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• López, R. G. 2016. “In Defense of Trait-Based Love.” European Journal of Philosophy 24 (4): 169–194.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. 1980. Emotion. Vol. 45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moors, A., P. C. Ellsworth, K. R. Scherer, and N. Frijda. 2013. “Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development.” Emotion Review 5 (2): 119–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naar, H. 2017. “Subject Relative Reasons for Love.” Ratio 30 (2): 197–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. 1989. The Examined Life Philosophical Meditations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren, A. 1989. “Agape and Eros.” In Eros, Agape and Philia, edited by A. Soble, 85–95. Paragon House: St. Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pitcher, G. 1965. “Emotion.” Mind. 74 (295): 326–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C. 2012. “What is the Point of Love?” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2): 217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz, J. 2004. Gut Reactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Protasi, S. 2016. “Loving People for Who They Are (Even When They Don’t Love You Back).” European Journal of Philosophy 24 (1): 214–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, J. 1975. Practical Reasoning and Norms. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, I. 1984. “Cognitive Determinants of Emotions.” In Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Vol. 5, edited by P. Shaver, 11–36. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, I., and C. Smith. 2001. “Appraisal Theory.” In Appraisal Processes in Emotion, edited by K. Scherer, A. Schorr, and T. Johnstone, 3–19. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scavone, A. 2016. “On Understanding Love.” Philosophical Inquiries 4 (2): 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck, K. 2014. “Loving the Lovable.” In Love and its Objects. What Can We Care For? edited by C. Maurer, T. Milligan, and K. Pacovská, 108–124. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shand, J. 2011. “Love As If.” Essays in Philosophy 12 (1): 2.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, P., J. Schwartz, D. Kirson, and C. O’Connor. 1987. “Emotion Knowledge: Further Explorations of a Prototype Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 1061–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, I. 1966. The Nature of Love. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smuts, A. 2014a. “Normative Reasons for Love, Part I.” Philosophy Compass 9 (8): 507–517.
   Google Scholar
• Smuts, A. 2014b. “Normative Reasons for Love, Part II.” Philosophy Compass 9 (8): 518–526.
   Google Scholar
• Soble, A. 1989. ‘Contemporary Analysis.’ In Soble, A. (ed.) Eros, Agape and Philia, edited by A. Soble, 185–196. Paragon House: St. Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Soble, A. 1990. The Structure of Love. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soble, A. 2000. “The Coherence of Love.” Philosophy and Theology 12 (2): 293–315.
   Google Scholar
• Soble, A. 2015. “Love and Value Yet Again.” In Love, Reason, and Will: Kierkegaard After Frankfurt, edited by A. Rudd and J. Davenport, 25–46. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, R. C. 2002. “Reasons for Love.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32 (1): 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, R. C. 2007. True to our Feelings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stendhal. 1822. On Love.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. 1975. “Love.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76: 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Teroni, F. 2007. “Emotions and Formal Objects.” Dialectica 61 (3): 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, J. D. 1999. “Love as a Moral Emotion.” Ethics 109 (2): 338–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. 1995. Love Between Equals: A Philosophical Study of Love and Sexual Relationships. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zangwill, N. 2013. “Love: Gloriously Amoral and Arational.” Philosophical Explorations 16 (3): 298–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar