Autonomy and radical evil: a Kantian challenge to constitutivism

References

• Aristotle. 1907. De Anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Translated and edited by R. D. Hicks.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1998. The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 1996. “Reason, Humanity, and the Moral Law.” In Sources of Normativity, edited by Christine Korsgaard, 167–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darwall, Stephen. 1992. “Internalism and Agency.” In Philosophical Perspectives, edited by J. E. Tomberlin, 155–174. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, Stephen. 2009. The Form of Practical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, David. 2006. “Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won't Come From What is Constitutive of Agency.” Philosophical Review 115: 169–198. doi: 10.1215/00318108-2005-014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch, David. 2011. “Shmagency Revisited.” In New Waves in Metaethics, edited by M. Brady, 208–233. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrero, Luca. 2009. “Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4: 303–333.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrero, Luca. 2018. “Inescapability Revisited.” Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia 41 (4): 113–158. doi: 10.1590/0100-6045.2018.v41n4.lf
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, W. J. 2005. “The Practical Turn in Ethical Theory: Korsgaard’s Constructivism, Realism, and the Nature of Normativity.” Ethics 115 (4): 651–691. doi: 10.1086/430750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobsch, Wolfram. 2014. “The Idea of an Ethical Community: Kant and Hegel on the Necessity of Human Evil and the Love to Overcome It.” Philosophical Topics 42 (1): 177–200. doi: 10.5840/philtopics20144218
   Google Scholar
• Haase, Matthias. 2014. “For Oneself and Toward Another: The Puzzle About Recognition.” Philosophical Topics 42 (1): 113–152. doi: 10.5840/philtopics20144216
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1996a. Critique of Practical Reason. In Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Mary J. Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1996b. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Mary J. Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1996c. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Mary J. Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1996d. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. In Immanuel Kant, Religion and Rational Theology. Translated by George di Giovanni and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katsafanas, Paul. 2013. Agency and the Foundations of Ethics: Nietzschean Constitutivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, Christine. 1997. “The Normativity of Instrumental Reason.” In Ethics and Practical Reason, edited by Garrett Cullity, and Berys Gaut, 215–254. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, Christine. 1999. “Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant.” Journal of Ethics 3: 1–29. doi: 10.1023/A:1026418314102
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, Christine. 2008. The Constitution of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, Christine. 2009. Self-Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millgram, Elijah. 1997. Practical Induction. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millgram, Elijah. 2005. “Practical Reason and the Structure of Actions.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward Zalta. Advance online publication. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/practical-reason-action/.
   Google Scholar
• Railton, Peter. 1986. “Moral Realism.” The Philosophical Review 95: 163–207. doi: 10.2307/2185589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosati, Connie. 2003. “Agency and the Open Question Argument.” Ethics 113: 490–528. doi: 10.1086/345625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapiro, Tamar. 1999. “What is a Child?” Ethics 109: 715–738. doi: 10.1086/233943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, Matthew. 2015. “The Shmagency Question.” Philosophical Studies 172 (5): 1127–1142. doi: 10.1007/s11098-014-0340-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, David. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, David. 2004. “Replies to Discussion on The Possibility of Practical Reason.” Philosophical Studies 121: 277–298. doi: 10.1007/s11098-004-5510-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, David. 2009. How We Get Along. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Walden, Kennetz. 2012. “Laws of Nature, Laws of Freedom, and the Social Construction of Normativity.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, 37–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. J. 2004. “Constructing Normativity.” Philosophical Topics 32: 451–476. doi: 10.5840/philtopics2004321/212
   Google Scholar