Publication Cover
Philosophical Explorations
An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action
Volume 23, 2020 - Issue 2
212
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Is reasoning responding to reasons?

References

  • Alvarez, M. 2010. “Reasons for Action and Practical Reasoning.” Ratio 23 (4): 355–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2010.00473.x
  • Audi, R. 2004. “Reasons, Practical Reason, and Practical Reasoning.” Ratio 17 (2): 119–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2004.00243.x
  • Bader, R. 2015. “Kantian Axiology and the Dualism of Practical Reason.” In The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory, edited by Iwao Hirose and Jonas Olson, 175–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Boghossian, P. 2014. “What Is Inference?” Philosophical Studies 169 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11098-012-9903-x
  • Broome, J. 2001. “Are Intentions Reasons?” In Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier, edited by Christopher Morris and Arthur Ripstein, 98–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Broome, J. 2013. Rationality through Reasoning. The Blackwell/Brown Lectures in Philosophy 4. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Broome, J. 2014a. “Comments on Boghossian.” Philosophical Studies 169 (1): 19–25. doi: 10.1007/s11098-012-9894-7
  • Broome, J. 2014b. “Normativity in Reasoning: Normativity in Reasoning.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (4): 622–633. doi: 10.1111/papq.12050
  • Broome, J. 2015. “Replies.” Teorema 34 (2): 191–209.
  • Dancy, J. 2018. Practical Shape. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Frege, G. 1979. Posthumous Writings. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Grice, H. P. 2001. Aspects of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hacker, P. M. S. 2007. Human Nature – The Categorial Framework. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Horty, J. F. 2012. Reasons as Defaults. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jackson, F., and R. Pargetter. 1986. “Oughts, Options, and Actualism.” The Philosophical Review 95 (2): 233. doi: 10.2307/2185591
  • Kauppinen, A. 2018. “Practical Reasoning.” In The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, edited by Daniel Star, 395–422. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kiesewetter, B. 2015. “Instrumental Normativity: In Defense of the Transmission Principle.” Ethics 125 (4): 921–946. doi: 10.1086/680911
  • Kolodny, N. 2018. “Instrumental Reasons.” In The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, edited by Daniel Star, 731–763. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Korsgaard, C. M. 1997. “The Normativity of Instrumental Reason.” In Ethics and Practial Reason, edited by Garrett Cullity and Berys Nigel Gaut, 215–254. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Korsgaard, C. M. 2009. “The Activity of Reason.” In Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 83: 23–43. JSTOR.
  • McHugh, C., and J. Way. 2018a. “What Is Good Reasoning?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (1): 153–174. doi: 10.1111/phpr.12299
  • McHugh, C., and J. Way. 2018b. “What Is Reasoning?” Mind 127 (505): 167–196. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzw068
  • Parfit, D. 2011. On What Matters Vol I. The Berkeley Tanner Lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pettit, P. 2007. “Joining the Dots.” In Common Minds: Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit, edited by Geoffrey Brennan, Robert Goodin, Frank Jackson, and Michael Smith, 215–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pettit, P. 2016. “Broome on Reasoning and Rule-Following.” Philosophical Studies 173 (12): 3373–3384. doi: 10.1007/s11098-016-0718-z
  • Pollock, J. L. 1987. “Defeasible Reasoning.” Cognitive Science 11 (4): 481–518. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4
  • Raz, J. 2011. From Normativity to Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Raz, J. 2015. “Normativity: The Place of Reasoning.” Philosophical Issues 25 (1): 144–164. doi: 10.1111/phis.12047
  • Scanlon, T. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Schroeder, M. 2007. Slaves of the Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shah, N. 2006. “A New Argument for Evidentialism.” The Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225): 481–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2006.454.x
  • Sylvan, K. 2016. “Epistemic Reasons II: Basing.” Philosophy Compass 11 (7): 377–389. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12329
  • Thomson, J. J. 2008. Normativity. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.