Empathy as a means to understand people

References

• Anscombe, G.M.E. 1963. Intention. Second Ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, Olivia. 2022. “Empathy and the Value of Humane Understanding.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104 (1): 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, Alexander. 1859. The Emotions and the Will. Second Edition 1865. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Berenson, Frances M. 1981. Understanding Persons: Personal and Impersonal Relationships. Brighton: The Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betzler, Monika, and Simon Keller. 2021. “Shared Belief and the Limits of Empathy.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 102: 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coplan, Amy. 2011. “Understanding Empathy: Its Features and Effects.” In Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, edited by Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie, 3–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debes, Remy. 2010. “Which Empathy? Limitations in the Mirrored ‘Understanding’ of Emotion.” Synthese 175: 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9499-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debes, Remy. 2016. “Understanding Persons and the Problem of Power.” In Making Sense of the World: New Essays on the Philosophy of Understanding, edited by Stephen R. Grimm, 54–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debes, Remy. 2017. “Empathy and Mirror Neurons.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy, edited by Heidi Maibom, 54–63. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Thomas. 2017. “Levels of Empathy – Primary, Extended, and Reiterated Empathy.” In Empathy: Epistemic Problems and Cultural-Historical Perspectives of a Cross-Disciplinary Concept, edited by Vanessa Lux and Sigrid Weigel, 27–47. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Shaun, and Daniel D. Hutto. 2012. “Understanding Others Through Primary Interaction and Narrative Practice.” In The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, edited by Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha, and Esa Itkonen, 17–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, Moritz. 1911. “Über das Wesen und die Bedeutung der Einfühlung.” In Bericht über den IV. Kongreß für Experimentelle Psychologie, edited by F. Schumann, 29–73. Leipzig: Verlag J. A. Barth.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, John. 2016. “Empathy.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Literature, edited by Noël Carroll and John Gibson, 234–246. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, Stephen R. 2016. “How Understanding People Differs from Understanding the Natural World.” Philosophical Issues 26: 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, Stephen R. 2019. “Understanding as an Intellectual Virtue.” In The Routledge Companion to Virtue Epistemology, edited by Heather Battaly, 340–351. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groethuysen, Bernhard. 1904. “Das Mitgefühl.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane 34: 161–270.
   Google Scholar
• Hannon, Michael. 2019. What’s the Point of Knowledge? A Function-First Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. 1739-1740. A Treatise of Human Nature [T], edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, Daniel D. 2016. “Narrative Understanding.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Literature, edited by Noël Carroll and John Gibson, 291–301. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspers, Karl. 1912. “Die Phänomenologische Forschungsrichtung in der Psychopathologie.” Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 9: 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02911781.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspers, Karl. 1913. Allgemeine Psychopathologie. Siebente Unveränderte Auflage 1946. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspers, Karl. 1968. “The Phenomenological Approach in Psychopathology.” British Journal of Psychiatry 114: 1313–1323. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.114.516.1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibom, Heidi. 2020. Empathy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medina, José. 2017. “Varieties of Hermeneutical Injustice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, edited by Kidd James, José Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus, Jr, 41–52. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, L. A. 2017. “First Personal Modes of Presentation and the Structure of Empathy.” Inquiry 60 (3): 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1261991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, L. A. 2021. “The Paradox of Empathy.” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche 18: 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2021.31.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Duncan. 2018. “Winch on Understanding Other People.” Philosophical Investigations 41 (4): 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheler, Max. 1913. Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. Fünfte Auflage 1948. Frankfurt/M: Verlag Schulte-Bulmke.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. 1759/1790. The Theory of Moral Sentiments [TMS]. Edited by Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Stueber, Karsten R. 2006. Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stueber, Karsten R. 2012. “Understanding Versus Explanation? How to Think About the Distinction Between the Human and the Natural Sciences.” Inquiry 55 (1): 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2012.643621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, J. David. 1992. “The Guise of the Good.” Noûs 26 (1): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1971. Explanation and Understanding. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Chris. 1995. “Karl Jaspers and Edmund Husserl IV: Phenomenology as Empathic Understanding.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 2 (3): 247–266.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, Peter. 1990. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. Second ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, Dan. 2014. Self & Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar