Evolving model architecture for custom output range exploration

References

• C. Hametner, M. Stadlbauer, M. Deregnaucourt, and S. Jakubek, Incremental optimal process excitation for online system identification based on evolving local model networks, Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 19 (13) (2013), pp. 505–525. doi:10.1080/13873954.2013.800122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Ranjan, D. Bingham, and G. Michailidis, Sequential experiment design for contour estimation from complex computer codes, Technometrics. 50 (2008), pp. 527–541. doi:10.1198/004017008000000541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Vazquez and J. Bect, A sequential Bayesian algorithm to estimate a probability of failure, Proceedings of the 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, SYSID 2009, Saint-Malo, July 2009, p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• H. Arenbeck, S. Missoum, A. Basudhar, and P. Nikravesh, Reliability-based optimal design and tolerancing for multibody systems using explicit design space decomposition, J. Mech. Des. 132 (2010), p. 021010. doi:10.1115/1.4000760.
   Google Scholar
• V. Picheny, D. Ginsbourger, O. Roustant, R.T. Haftka, and N.H. Kim, Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region, J. Mech. Des. 132 (2010), p. 071008. doi:10.1115/1.4001873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.C. Kuczera and Z.P. Mourelatos, On estimating the reliability of multiple failure region problems using approximate metamodels, J. Mech. Des. 131 (2009), p. 121003. doi:10.1115/1.4000326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Lughofer, FLEXFIS: A robust incremental learning approach for evolving Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy models, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16 (2008), pp. 1393–1410. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2008.925908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Nelles, Nonlinear System Identification: From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models, Springer, Berlin, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• C. Hametner and S. Jakubek, Engine model identification using local model networks in comparison with a multilayer perceptron network, Proceedings of the 2nd International Multi-Conference on Complexity, Informatics and Cybernetics: IMCIC, Orlando, FL, March 2011.
   Google Scholar
• B. Hartmann, J. Moll, O. Nelles, and C.P. Fritzen, Hierarchical local model trees for design of experiments in the framework of ultrasonic structural health monitoring, IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA), Denver, CO, September 2011, pp. 1163–1170.
   Google Scholar
• C. Hametner and S. Jakubek, Local model network identification for online engine modelling, Inf. Sci. 220 (2013), pp. 210–225. Online Fuzzy Machine Learning and Data Mining. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Johnson, L. Moore, and D. Ylvisaker, Minimax and maximin distance designs, J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 26 (1990), pp. 131–148. doi:10.1016/0378-3758(90)90122-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Stinstra, D. den Hertog, P. Stehouwer, and A. Vestjens, Constrained maximin designs for computer experiments, Technometrics. 45 (2003), pp. 340–346. doi:10.1198/004017003000000168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Nelles, Nonlinear System Identification, 1st ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• P. Pucar and M. Millnert, Smooth hinging hyperplanes – An alternative to neural networks, Proceedings of the 3rd ECC, Rome, September 1995.
   Google Scholar
• L. Eriksson, Design of Experiments: Principles and Applications, Umetrics Academy, Umeå, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Bard, Nonlinear Parameter Estimation, Academic Press, New York, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• T. Santner, B.J. Williams, and W. Notz, The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• L. Pronzato, Optimal experimental design and some related control problems, Automatica. 44 (2008), pp. 303–325. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Franceschini and S. Macchietto, Model-based design of experiments for parameter precision: State of the art, Chem. Eng. Sci. 63 (2008), pp. 4846–4872. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2007.11.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.J. Mueller, A.L. Boehman, and G.C. Martin, An experimental investigation of the origin of increased NOx emissions when fueling a heavy-duty compression-ignition engine with soy biodiesel, SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2 (2009), pp. 789–816.
   Google Scholar
• C. Ericson, B. Westerberg, M. Andersson, and R. Egnell, Modelling diesel engine combustion and NOx formation for model based control and simulation of engine and exhaust aftertreatment systems, SAE Paper, 2006, pp. 01–0687. doi:10.4271/2006-01-0687.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Wurzenberger, R. Heinzle, A. Schuemie, and T. Katrasnik, Crank-Angle Resolved Real-Time Engine Simulation – Integrated Simulation Tool Chain from Office to Testbed, SAE International, Warrandale, PA, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• R. Basshuysen and F. Schaefer (eds.), Handbuch Verbrennungsmotor, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery, and C.M. Anderson-Cook, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd ed., Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2009.
   Google Scholar