Mental representation of landmarks on maps: Investigating cartographic visualization methods with eye tracking technology

References

• Andersen, N. E., Dahmani, L., Konishi, K., & Bohbot, V. D. (2012). Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 97(1), 81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., & Douglass, S. (2004). Eye movements do not reflect retrieval processes limits of the eye-mind hypothesis. Psychological Science, 15(4), 225–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2010). Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and more. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 3(3), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitter, R. (1999). Kognitive Karten und Kartographie. Kartographische Nachrichten, 49(3), 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Bitter, R. (2000). Unterstützung Kognitiver Karten durch interaktive multimediale kartographische Informationssysteme. Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen – Interaktive Karten (Atlanten) und Multimedia-Applikationen, 53, 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bollmann, J., Heidmann, F., & Johann, M. (1997). Kartographische Bildschirmkommunikation: Methodische Ansätze zur empirischen Untersuchung raumbezogener Informationsprozesse. In Trierer Geographische Studien, 16, 267–284.
   Google Scholar
• Borji, A., Lennartz, A., & Pomplun, M. (2015). What do eyes reveal about the mind? Algorithmic inference of search targets from fixations. Neurocomputing, 149, 788–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., & Alvarez, G. A. (2011). A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brus, J., Vondrakova, A., & Vozenilek, V. (Eds.). (2015). Modern trends in cartography. Selected Papers of CARTOCON 2014. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brychtová, A., & Coltekin, A. (2014). An empirical user study for measuring the influence of colour distance and font size in map reading using eye tracking. The Cartographic Journal, 51(4), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Brychtová, A., Popelka, S., & Vozenilek, V. (2011). The analysis of eye movement as a tool for evaluation of maps and graphical outputs from GIS. In Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Geography and Geoinformatics: Challenge for Practise and Education (pp. 154–162). Brno, 2011, 154–162.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin, A. K. (1996). Landmarks as navigational aids on street maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 23(1), 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, M., Michon, P.-E., & Tom, A. (2006). Assisting pedestrian wayfinding in urban settings: Why references to landmarks are crucial in direction-giving. In G. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition – from research to cognitive technology (pp. 25–51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. London, UK: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Visual search: A retrospective. Journal of Vision, 14, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, B., & Paelke, V. (2008). User-centered design of landmark visualization. In L. Meng, A. Zipf, & S. Winter (Eds.), Map-based mobile services – design, interaction and usability. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 33–56). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrikant, S. I., Hespanha, S. R., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Cognitively inspired and perceptually salient graphic displays for efficient spatial inference making. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., Li, Q., Zhang, X., & Shaw, S. L. (2012). A GIS data model for landmark-based pedestrian navigation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(5), 817–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios, S., Uttley, J., Cheal, C., & Hara, N. (2015). Using eye-tracking to identify pedestrians' critical visual tasks, Part 1. Dual task approach. Lighting Research and Technology, 47(2), 133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulsham, T., Walker, E., & Kingstone, A. (2011). The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research, 51, 1920–1931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freundschuh, S. M., Neil, J. S., & Paul, B. B. (2001). Wayfinding and navigation behavior. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 16391–16394). Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Geise, S. (2011). Eyetracking in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft: Theorie, Methode und kritische Reflektion. In S. Geise (Ed.), Studies in communication and media (Vol. 2, pp. 149–263). Nomos, Mannheim.
   Google Scholar
• Giannopoulos, I., Kiefer, P., & Raubal, M. (2013). The influence of gaze history visualization on map interaction sequences and cognitive maps. In F. Schmid & C. Kray (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Map Interaction. Orlando, FL, USA. 1–6, 3–5 November 2013, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H., & Wichansky, A. M. (2003). Eye tracking in usability evaluation: A practitioner's guide. In J. Hyona, R. Radach, & H. Deudel (Eds.), The mind's eyes: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements (pp. 493–516). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G. (1999). Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2002). Human factors in traffic safety. In R. E. Dewar & P. L. Olson (Eds.), (pp. 77–110). Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hamid, S. N., Stankiewicz, B., & Hayhoe, M. (2010). Gaze patterns in navigation: Encoding information in large-scale environments. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayhoe, M., & Ballard, D. (2005). Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 188–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K., & Subbiah, I. (2002). Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence, 30(5), 425–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornof, A. J., & Halverson, T. (2002). Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locations Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 34(4), 592–604.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Incoul, A., Ooms, K., & De Maeyer, P. (2015). Comparing paper and digital topographic maps using eye tracking. In J. Brus, A. Vondrakova, & V. Vozenilek (Eds.), Modern trends in cartography. Selected Papers of CARTOCON 2014. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, P., Giannopoulos, I., & Raubal, M. (2013). Using eye movements to recognize activities on cartographic maps. In Proceedings of the 21st SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (pp. 498–501). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, P., Straub, F., & Raubal, M. (2012). Towards location-aware mobile eye tracking. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 313–316). Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., & Winter, S. (2005). Structural salience of landmarks for route directions. In A. G. Cohn & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory, Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 3693, (pp. 347–362). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koesling, H. (2003). Visual perception of location, orientation and length: An eye-movement approach  (Doctoral dissertation). Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Forlizzi, J., & Hudson, S. E. (2008). Iterative design of MOVE: A situationally appropriate vehicle navigation system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 198–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingwood, J., Blades, M., Farran, E. K., Courbois, Y., & Matthews, D. (2015). The development of wayfinding abilities in children: Learning routes with and without landmarks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 74–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelace, K. L., Hegarty, M., & Montello, D. R. (1999). Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In C. Freksa & D. M. Mark (Hrsg.) Spatial information theory: Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science (pp. 65–82). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mallot, H. A. (2012). Raumkognition. In H. O. Karnath & P. Thier (Eds.), Kognitive Neurowissenschaften (pp. 217–224). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• May, A. J., Ross, T., Bayer, S. H., & Tarkiainen, M. J. (2003). Pedestrian navigation aids: information requirements and design implications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7, 331–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, A., & Matos, R. (2012). Identifying parameter values for an I-VT fixation filter suitable for handling data sampled with various sampling frequencies. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 317–320). Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ooms, K., De Maeyer, P., & Fack, B. (2014). Study of the attentive behavior of novice and expert map users using eye tracking. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41(1), 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, D., Wu, Y., & Winter, S. (2010). Testing landmark identification theories in virtual environments. In C. Hölscher, T. F. Shipley, M. O. Belardinelli, J. A. Bateman, & N. S. Newcombe (Eds.), Spatial cognition VII. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 54–69). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1988). Points of reference in spatial cognition: Stalking the elusive landmark. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(4), 378–381.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, K. F., & Winter, S. (2014). Landmarks. In GIScience for Intelligent Services. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Röser, F., Krumnack, A., & Hamburger, K. (2013). The influence of perceptual and structural salience. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3315–3320). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, T., May, A., & Thompson, S. (2004). The use of landmarks in pedestrian navigation instructions and the effects of context. In S. Brewster & M. Dunlop (Eds.), Mobile Computer Interaction – MobileHCI 2004 (pp. 300–304). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Salvucci, D. D. (1999). Mapping eye movements to cognitive processes (Doctoral dissertation). Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Salvucci, D. D., & Goldberg, J. H. (2000). Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 71–78). Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Schwering, A., Li, R., & Anacta, V. J. A. (2013). Orientation information in different forms of route instructions. In Short Paper Proceedings of the 16th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Servatius, K. (2009). Dynamische Unterstützungsformen in kartographischen Medien. Selbstverl. d. Geograph. Ges. Trier, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, A., & White, S. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 10, 9–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steck, S. D., & Mallot, H. A. (2000). The role of global and local landmarks in virtual environmental navigation. Presence, 9(1), 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Tom, A. C., & Tversky, B. (2012). Remembering routes: streets and landmarks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 182–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B. (1993). Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 14–24). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Viviani, P. (1990). Eye movements in visual search: Cognitive, perceptual, and motor control aspects. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 353–393). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar