References
- Akaike, H. (1998). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, & G. Kitagawa (Eds.), Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike (pp. 199–213). Springer, New York, NY. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15
- Albrecht, R., & von Stülpnagel, R. (2018). Memory for salient landmarks: Empirical findings and a cognitive model. In S. Creem-Regehr, J. Schöning, & A. Klippel(Eds., Spatial cognition XI (Vol. 11034, pp. 311–325). Springer, Cham. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96385-3_21
- Bartoń, K. (2020). MuMIn: Multi-model inference (1.43.17). Computer software. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
- Brügger, A., Richter, K.-F., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2019). How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4(1), 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0156-5
- Bucher, L., Röser, F., Nejasmic, J., & Hamburger, K. (2014). Belief revision and way-finding. Cognitive Processing, 15(1), 99–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0577-x
- Buchner, A., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2008). Is route learning more than serial learning? Spatial Cognition and Computation, 8(4), 289–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13875860802047201
- Caduff, D., & Timpf, S. (2008). On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation. Cognitive Processing, 9(4), 249–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2
- Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., & Bertolo, L. (1999). Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), 145–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199904)13:2<145::AID-ACP550>3.0.CO;2-4
- Hamburger, K. (2020). Visual landmarks are exaggerated: A theoretical and empirical view on the meaning of landmarks in human wayfinding. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 34(4), 557–562. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00668-5
- Hamburger, K., & Knauff, M. (2011). SQUARELAND: A virtual environment for investigating cognitive processes in human wayfinding. PsychNology Journal, 9(2), 137–163.
- Hamburger, K., & Röser, F. (2014). The role of landmark modality and familiarity in human wayfinding. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 73(4), 205–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000139
- Hinterecker, T., Röser, F., Strickrodt, M., & Hamburger, K. (2014). SQUARELAND 2.0: A flexible and realistic virtual environment for investigating cognitive processes in human wayfinding. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 36, pp. 2363–2368), Quebec City, Canada.
- Hinterecker, T., Strickrodt, M., Röser, F., & Hamburger, K. (2014). The influence of structural salience and verbalisation on finding the return path. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol.36, pp. 613–618). Cognitive Science Society, Quebec City, Canada.
- Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3), 194–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/35058500
- Jacob, C., Rainville, C., Trognon, A., Fescharek, R., Baumann, C., Clerc‐Urmes, I., & Jonveaux, T. R. (2020). Spatial navigation: Cognitive variables involved in route retracing among an elderly population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 1457–1472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3725
- Janzen, G. (2006). Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(3), 493–508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000746
- Karimpur, H., Röser, F., & Hamburger, K. (2016). Finding the return path: Landmark position effects and the influence of perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1956), 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01956
- Kattenbeck, M., Nuhn, E., & Timpf, S. (2018). Is salience robust? A heterogeneity analysis of survey ratings. In S. Winter, A. Griffin, & M. Sester (Eds.), 10th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2018) (Vol. 114, p. 7: 1–7:16). Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany. doi:https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GISCIENCE.2018.7
- Klippel, A., & Winter, S. (2005). Structural salience of landmarks for route directions. In A. G. Cohn & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory. COSIT 2005 (pp. 347–362). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3693. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/11556114_22
- Lovelace, K. L., Hegarty, M., & Montello, D. (1999). Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In C. Freksa & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory. Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. COSIT 1999 (pp. 65–82). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1661. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_5
- Michon, P.-E., & Denis, M. (2001). When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In D. Montello (Ed.), Spatial information theory. COSIT 2001 (pp. 292–305). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2205. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_20
- Miller, J., & Carlson, L. (2011). Selecting landmarks in novel environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 184–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0038-9
- Montello, D. R. (2017). Landmarks are exaggerated. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 31(2), 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-016-0473-5
- Münzer, S., & Hölscher, C. (2011). Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zu räumlichen Strategien. Diagnostica, 57(3), 111–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000040
- Nuhn, E. (2020). Modelling of personalised landmarks. University of Augsburg, Faculty of Applied Computer Science, Augsburg, Germany.
- Nuhn, E., & Timpf, S. (2017). A multidimensional model for selecting personalised landmarks. Journal of Location Based Services, 11(3–4), 153–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17489725.2017.1401129
- Nuhn, E., & Timpf, S. (2018). An overall framework for personalised landmark selection. In P. Kiefer, H. Huang, N. Van De Weghe, & M. Raubal (Eds.), Progress in location based services 2018. LBS 2018 (pp. 231–253). Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71470-7_12
- Nuhn, E., & Timpf, S. (2020). How to model (personalised) landmarks? In J. Šķilters, N. S. Newcombe, & D. Uttal (Eds.), Spatial cognition XII. Spatial Cognition 2020 (pp. 33–49). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12162. Springer, Cham. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_3
- Ohm, C., Müller, M., Ludwig, B., & Bienk, S. (2014). Where is the landmark? Eye tracking studies in large-scale indoor environments. In P. Kiefer, I. Giannopoulos, M. Raubal, & A. Krüger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Eye Tracking for Spatial Research co-located with the 8th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2014) (pp. 47–51). Vienna, Austria.
- Peters, D., Wu, Y., & Winter, S. (2010). Testing landmark identification theories in virtual environments. In C. Hölscher, T. F. Shipley, M. Olivetti Belardinelli, J. A. Bateman, & N. S. Newcombe (Eds.), Spatial cognition VII . Spatial Cognition 2010 (pp. 54–69). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6222. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_8
- Piccardi, L., Palmiero, M., Bocchi, A., Boccia, M., & Guariglia, C. (2019). How does environmental knowledge allow us to come back home? Experimental Brain Research, 237(7), 1811–1820. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05552-9
- Quesnot, T., & Roche, S. (2014). Measure of landmark semantic salience through geosocial data streams. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(1), 1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4010001
- Raubal, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egenhofer M.J., Mark D.M. (eds) Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2002 (pp. 243-259). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2478. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45799-2_17
- Richter, K.-F., & Winter, S. (2014). Landmarks: GIScience for intelligent services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05732-3
- Röser, F. (2015). The cognitive observer-based landmark-preference model: What is the ideal landmark position at an intersection? (Thesis.Doctoral). Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen. http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/frontdoor.php?source_opus=11640&la=de
- Röser, F., Hamburger, K., & Knauff, M. (2011). The Giessen virtual environment laboratory: Human wayfinding and landmark salience. Cognitive Processing, 12(2), 209–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0390-3
- Röser, F., Hamburger, K., Krumnack, A., & Knauff, M. (2012). The structural salience of landmarks: Results from an on-line study and a virtual environment experiment. Journal of Spatial Science, 57(1), 37–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2012.686362
- Röser, F., Krumnack, A., & Hamburger, K. (2013). The influence of perceptual and structural salience. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 35(35). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1520p5dc
- Röser, F., Krumnack, A., Hamburger, K., & Knauff, M. (2012). A four factor model of landmark salience–A new approach. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM) (pp. 82–87). Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
- Schwering, A., Krukar, J., Li, R., Anacta, V. J., & Fuest, S. (2017). Wayfinding through orientation. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 17(4), 273–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2017.1322597
- Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in child development and behavior, 10, 9–55
- Sorrows, M. E., & Hirtle, S. C. (1999). The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In C. Freksa & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory. Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. COSIT 1999 (pp. 37–50). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1661. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_3
- Strickrodt, M., Hinterecker, T., Röser, F., & Hamburger, K. (2014). What if you could build your own landmark? The influence of color, shape, and position on landmark salience. In A. Belardinelli & M. Butz (Eds.), 12th Biannual Conference of the German Cognitive Science Society (KogWis 2014) (pp. 142–144). Tübingen, Germany. Pabst Science. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0632-2
- Van Asselen, M., Fritschy, E., & Postma, A. (2006). The influence of intentional and incidental learning on acquiring spatial knowledge during navigation. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 70(2), 151–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0199-0
- Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. doi:https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
- von Stülpnagel, R., & Frankenstein, J. (2015). Configurational salience of landmarks: An analysis of sketch maps using Space Syntax. Cognitive Processing, 16(S1), 437–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0726-5
- von Stülpnagel, R., & Steffens, M. C. (2012). Active route learning in virtual environments: Disentangling movement control from intention, instruction specificity, and navigation control. Psychological Research, 77(5), 555–574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0451-y
- Voormann, A., Spektor, M. S., & Klauer, K. C. (2021). The simultaneous recognition of multiple words: A process analysis. Memory & Cognition, 49(4), 787–802. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01082-w
- Wenczel, F., Hepperle, L., & von Stülpnagel, R. (2017). Gaze behavior during incidental and intentional navigation in an outdoor environment. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 17(1–2), 121–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2016.1226838
- Wiener, J. M., Kmecova, H., & de Condappa, O. (2012). Route repetition and route retracing: Effects of cognitive aging. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 4. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2012.00007
- Winter, S. (2003). Route adaptive selection of salient features. In W. Kuhn, M. F. Worboys, & S. Timpf(Eds.), Spatial information theory. Foundations of geographic information science. COSIT 2003 (Vol. 2825, pp. 349–361). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2825. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_23
- Yesiltepe, D., Conroy Dalton, R., & Ozbil Torun, A. (2021). Landmarks in wayfinding: A review of the existing literature. Cognitive Processing, 22(3), 369–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-021-01012-x