2,016
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

Policy Advocacy Coalitions as Causes of Policy Change in China? Analyzing Evidence from Contemporary Environmental Politics

, &

References

  • Ainuson, K., 2009, An advocacy coalition approach to water policy change in Ghana: A look at belief systems and policy oriented learning. Journal of African Studies and Development, 1(2), 16–27.
  • Brewer, N., 2008, Earthquake shines spotlight on dam safety in China. World Rivers Review, 23(3), 16. Available at http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/3319.
  • Brown, P. H., Magee, D. and Xu, Y., 2008, Socioeconomic vulnerability in China’s hydropower development. China Economic Review, 19, 614–627,.
  • Bureau of Resettlement and Development, 2007, Shuidian jianshe: yimin zhishi 500 wen [Hydropower development: 500 questions on resettlement]. The Nu River Lisu Autonomous Prefecture.
  • Büsgen, M., 2006. “NGOs and the Search for Chinese Civil Society Environmental Non-governmental Organizations in the Nujiang Campaign.” Institute of Social Studies. Working Paper Series No. 422.
  • Cao, H., 2004, nujiang daba [The Nu River Dam]. Jingji [Economics], May.
  • Carter, N., 2007, The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy, (New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • Carvalho, G. O., 2001, Metallurgical development in the Carajas area: A case study of the evolution of environmental policy formation in Brzail. Society and Natural Resources, 14(2), 127–143.
  • Cheng, T. and Womack, B., 1996, General reflection on informal politics in East Asia. Asian Survey, 36(3), 320–337.
  • China Electrical Facilities, 2007, Huadian jituan cao peixi huijian yunnan nujiangzhou zhouwei shuji zhouzhang [Huadian’s CEO Cao meets with the governor of the Nu Prefecture of Yunnan]. April 19, available at http://news.cepee.com.
  • Chinese Society for Hydroelectric Engineering, 2009, Gaige kaifang sanshinian zhongguo shuidian shiye jinzhan [The development of hydropower in China over the past 30-year’s reform and opening]. Available from the Huadian Corporation’s website at http://www.chd.com.cn/news.
  • Collier, D. and Mahon, J. E., Jr., 1993, Conceptual “Stretching” Revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 845–855.
  • Deng, X., 2008, Fengxian goutongzhong huanbao NGO de meijie chengxian jiqi minzu yihan [Media representation, discourse strategies and democratic implications of the environmental NGOs’ risk communication: A case study about the disputes of Nujiang dam). Wuhan Ligong Daxue xuebao [Wuhan University of Technology], 21(5), 771–776.
  • Eckstein, H., 1975, Regarding Politics: Essays on Political Theory, Stability, and Change, (Berkeley: University of California Press).
  • Fingar, T., 1987, Implementing energy policy: The rise and demise of the state energy commission, in: D. Lampton (Ed) Policy Implementation in Post-Mao China (Berkeley: University of California Press), 190–224.
  • Friends of Nature, et al. 2005, Call for public disclosure of the Nu River hydropower development’s EIA report in accordance with the law. Available at http://www.internationalrivers.org/resources/chinese-groups-demand-disclosure-of-environmental-studies-3303.
  • Fu, T., 2007, Development of NGOs in China on internet, in: C. Liang and D. Yang (Eds) The China Environmental Yearbook 2005: Crisis and Breakthrough of China’s Environment (Beijing: The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences).
  • Gerring, J., 2007, Is there a (viable) crucial-case method?. Comparative Political Studies, 40(3), 231–253.
  • Han, H., 2013, China’s policymaking in transition: A hydropower development case. Journal of Environment & Development, 22(3), 313–336.
  • He, G., 2007, guanyu tuijin nujiang liuyu shuinengziyuan kaifade sikao [Consideration for accelerating development of water potentials in Nu River basin). Shuili Dianli [Hydropower], 33(5), 1–3.
  • Ho, P. and Edmonds, R. L., 2008, China’s Embedded Activism: Opportunities and Constraints of a Social Movement, (New York: Routeldge).
  • Hsu, S.-H., 2005, Advocacy coalitions and policy change on nuclear power utilization in Taiwan. The Social Science Journal, 42(2), 215–229.
  • Hysing, E. and Olsson, J., 2008, Contextualizing the advocacy coalition framework: Theorizing change in Swedish forest policy. Environmental Politics, 17(5), 730–748.
  • Jenkins-Smith, H. C. and Sabatier, P. A., 1994, Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of Public Policy, 14(2), 175–203.
  • John, P., 2003, Is there life after policy streams, advocacy coalitions, and punctuations: Using evolutionary theory to explain policy change? The Policy Studies Journal, 31(4), 481–498.
  • Kim, S., 2003, Irresolvable cultural conflicts and conservation/development arguments: Analysis of Korea’s Saemangeum project. Policy Sciences, 36(2), 125–149.
  • Kübler, D., 1999, Ideas as catalytic elements for policy change: Advocacy coalitions and drug policy in Switzerland, in: D. Braun and A. Busch (Eds) Public Policy and Political Ideas (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited), 116–135.
  • Lafraniere, S., 2009, Is China quake a man-made or natural disaster? New York Times, 6 February, Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/world/asia/06iht-06quake.19978278.html?pagewanted=all.
  • Lampton, D., 1987, The implementation probe in post-Mao China, in: D. Lampton (Ed) Policy Implementation in Post-Mao China (Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press), 3–24.
  • Lawrence, S. V. and Martin, M. F., 2013, Understanding China’s political system. CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service. Available at http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41007.pdf.
  • Lema, A. and Ruby, K., 2007, Between fragmented authoritarianism and policy coordination: Creating a Chinese market for wind energy. Energy Policy, 35(7), 3879–3890.
  • Li, C., 2009, One party, two coalitions in China’s politics. The Brookings Institution. Available online at http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0816_china_li.aspx (27 March 2012).
  • Li, J., 2013, Ban lifted on controversial Nu River dam projects. South China Morning Post. 25 January, available at http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1135463/ban-lifted-controversial-nu-river-dam-projects.
  • Lieberthal, K., 1992, Introduction: the ‘fragmented authoritarianism’ model and its limitations, in: K. Lieberthal and D. Lampton (Eds) Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China (Berkeley: University of California Press), 1–30.
  • Lieberthal, K. and Lampton, D., 1992, Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China, (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).
  • Lieberthal, K. and Oksenberg, M., 1988, Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes, (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Litfin, K. T., 2000, Advocacy coalitions along the domestic foreign frontier: Globalization and Canadian climate change policy. Policy Studies Journal, 28(1), 236–252.
  • Litzinger, R., 2007, In search of the grassroots: Hydroelectric politics in Northwest Yunnan, in: E. J. Perry and M. Goldman (Eds) Grassroots Political Reform in Contemporary China (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press), 282–299.
  • Lu, Y., 2007, Environmental governance and civil society in China. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 64(1), 59–69.
  • Lu, B., 2008, Quietly resuming the dam building: Nu River calls for help again. Nanfang dushibao [Southern City Daily], 17 March, available at http://www.nangfangdaily.com.cn/southnews/jwxy/200803170026.asp.
  • Lu, Y., 2009, Non-Governmental Organizations in China: the Rise of Dependent Autonomy, (New York: Routledge).
  • Magee, D., 2006, New energy geographies: Powershed politics and hydropower decision making in Yunnan-China. Ph.D. diss. University of Washington.
  • Meijerink, S. V., 2005, Understanding policy stability and change: The interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1956–2003. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), 1060–1077.
  • Mertha, A., 2008, China’s Water Warriors: Citizen Action and Policy Change, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
  • Mertha, A., 2009, Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process. The China Quarterly, 200, 995–1012.
  • Miller, A., 2007, Hu Jintao and the sixth plenum. China Leadership Monitor, No. 20 Winter, pp. 1–12.
  • Moore, A. and Warren, A., 2006, Legal advocacy in environmental public participation in China: raising the stakes and strengthening stakeholders. China Environment Series, No. 8, pp. 3–26.
  • Myers, J., 1989, Whatever happened to chairman Mao? Myth and charisma in the Chinese revolution, in: V. C. Falkenheim (Ed) Chinese Politics From Mao to Deng (New York: Paragon), 17–40.
  • Nohrstedt, D., 2011, Shifting resources and venues producing policy change in contested subsystems: A case study of Swedish signals intelligence policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 461–484.
  • Nujiangbao [Nu River Daily], 2009, jiaqi zhengqi gongjin zhi qiao [Establish a common bridge between the government and the business], 24 June.
  • People’s Daily, 2006, Chinese premier addresses media on major issues, 15 March, at http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200603/15/eng20060315_250735.html.
  • Qiu, X. and Li, H., 2009, China’s environmental super ministry reform: background, challenges, and the future. Environmental Law Reporter, News & Analysis, 39(2), 10152–10163.
  • Ramzy, A., 2008, Damming China’s river wild. Time Magazine, 19 June, available at http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1813087,00.html.
  • Roney, B., 2011, Earthquakes and civil society: A comparative study of the response of China’s nongovernmental organizations to the Wenchuan earthquake. China Information, 25(1), 83–104.
  • Ru, J. and Ortolano, L., 2009, Development of citizen-organized environmental NGOs in China. Voluntas, 20(2), 141–168.
  • Sabatier, P. A., 1998, The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130.
  • Sabatier, P. A., 2007, The need for better theories, in: P. A. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder: Westview Press), 321–336.
  • Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H., 1988, An advocacy coalition model of policy change and the role of policy oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168.
  • Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H., 1999, The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment, in: P. A. Sabatier Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder: Westview Press), 117–166.
  • Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M., 2007, The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications, in: P. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder: Westview Press), 189–220.
  • Sartori, G., 1970, Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64, 1033–1053.
  • Sato, H., 1999, The advocacy coalition framework and the policy process analysis: The case of smoking control in Japan. Policy Studies Journal, 27(1), 28–44.
  • Schlager, E. and Bloomquist, W., 1996, A comparison of three emerging theories of the policy process. Political Research Quarterly, 49(3), 651–672.
  • Sotirov, M. and Memmler, M., 2012, The advocacy coalition framework in natural resource policy studies—recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 51–64.
  • Sun, Y. and Zhao, D., 2007, Multifaceted state and fragmented society: Dynamics of environmental movement in China, in: D. Yang (Ed) Discontented Miracle: Growth, Conflict and Institutional Adaptations in China (Singapore: World Scientific), 111–159.
  • Teiwes, F. C., 1984, Leadership, Legitimacy, and Conflict in China: From a Charismatic Mao to the Politics of Succession, (Armonk: M.E. Sharpe).
  • Tewari, D. D., 2001, Is commercial forestry sustainable in South Africa? The changing institutional and policy needs. Forest Policy and Economics, 2(3–4), 333–353.
  • Thompson, D. and Lu, X., 2006, China’s evolving civil society: From environment to health. China Environmental Series, 8, 27–40.
  • Villamor, G. B., 2006, The rise of protected area policy in Philippine forest policy: An analysis from the perspective of advocacy coalition framework (ACF). Forest Policy and Economics, 9(2), 162–178.
  • Wang, Y., 2007, Shenqing de yilian: nujiang [Deep attachment from the bottom of the heart: Nu River]. Available at http://www.greensos.cn.
  • Weible, C. M., 2005, Beliefs and perceived influence in a natural resource conflict: An advocacy coalition approach to policy networks. Political Research Quarterly, 58(3), 461–475.
  • Weible, C. M., 2006, An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 95–117.
  • Weible, C. M., 2008, Expert-based information and policy subsystems: A review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615–635.
  • Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D. and deLeon, P., 2011, A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: An introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 349–360.
  • Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A. and McQueen, K., 2009, Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121–140.
  • Wenweipo, 2006, Nu jiang shuidian wancheng huanping shencha [Nu River hydropower development passes environmental impact assessment]. 11 January, Available at http://www.cyol.net/cydgn/content/2006-03/30content_1347396.htm.
  • World Heritage Committee, 2004, UNESCO convention concerning the protection of the cultural and natural heritage. Twenty-eighth session, 28 June–7 July, Suzhou, China. Available at http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2004.
  • World Heritage Committee, 2005, UNESCO convention concerning the protection of the cultural and natural heritage. Twenty-ninth session, 10–17 July. Durban, South Africa. Available at http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2005.
  • World Heritage Committee, 2006, UNESCO convention concerning the protection of the cultural and natural heritage. Thirtieth session, 8–16 July, Vilnius, Lithuania. Available at http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2006.
  • Xie, Yi., 2008, Nujiang De Xuanze [the Choice of the Nu River], (Beijing: Nationality Publishing Company).
  • Xu, X., 2005, zhongguo NGO yu zhengfu de jiemeng [Chinese NGO and the government form alliance].Shangwu Zhoukan [Commerce Weekly], 20 March, pp. 62–65.
  • Xue, Ye. and Wang, Y., 2007, Highly controversial hydropower development in Western China, in: C. Yang and D. Yang (Eds) The China Environmental Yearbook 2005: Crisis and Breakthrough of China’s Environment (Beijing: The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences), 63–88.
  • Yan, Y., 2009, China’s media power evidenced in ‘anti-dam’ movement. Science News, 22 October, available at http://discover.news.163.com/09/1022/10/5M7MGEKV000125LI.html.
  • Yang, G. and Calhoun, C., 2007, Media, civil society, and the rise of a green public sphere in China. China Information, 21(2), 211–236.
  • Yardley, J., 2004, Dam building threatens China’s ‘Grand Canyon’. New York Times, 10 March, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/10/world/dam-building-threatens-china-s-grand-canyon.html.
  • Yunnan Daily, 2006, Nujiang kaifa: huhuan teshi teban [Nu River development: Calls for special attention to the special issue]. 13 March, available at http://www.chd.com.cn/news.do?cmd=show&id=18343.
  • Yunnan Daily, 2009, Shierwu yunnan dianwang fazhan landtu huijiu [The blueprint completed for the development of Yunnan’s power grid for the twelfth five-year plan period], 30, July, p. 4.
  • Zhang, Y. and Zhou, S., 2007, Wo guo shuineng kaifa xieshang zhili tezheng yanjiu [Research on the characteristics of the negotiation governance of hydropower development in China]. Qiusuo, May. pp. 42–46.
  • Zhao, T., 2010, Wang Yongchen’s decade river project: A matter of love and sorrow for rivers. China Youth Daily, 3 June, available at http://eng.greensos.cn.
  • Zhu, J., 2008, Gonggong zhengcede gongmin canyu: yi huanbao NGO canyu gonggong gongcheng juece weili [Citizen participation in public policy: A case of environmental protection NGO], in: X. Jia (Ed) Zhongguo Gongmin Canyu: Anli Yu Moshi [Citizen Participation in China: Cases and Models] (Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press), 19–45.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.